tiger4ever
Active member
@alien said:how dare i say anything bad about leichhardt oval, lol
do you ever say anything good about the oval.Dont go simple one less wont kill.
Then you can stand up at home in front of the tv.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@alien said:how dare i say anything bad about leichhardt oval, lol
@Alf Duguid said:The toilets are crap too
@tiger4ever said:toilets are crap i agree with that on the hillside…..im suprised its not a health issue to be honest.Its the councils doing.
@Gary Bakerloo said:The ground has its issues, but overall is a good place to watch a game of footy provided the crowd is not too large.
I doubt we will be playing at either Leichhardt or Campbelltown in 15-20 years without significant redevelopment of both grounds. By this time, the grounds will need to hold 30,000 for it to be viable to play at them.
The signs are already here. In the space of two weeks we could have two 20,000+ crowds when we could have have sold maybe 25,000+ tickets. Turning consumers away is not a sustainable business practice.
@Tiger Watto said:I always love going to Leichhardt, but I feel you are 100% correct.
The Tigers is a growing Club and has an ever growing fan base which is wide and deverse. I recall the Titans game earlier this year and the Broncos game late last year, and on both these occasions, I would say there was at least 30% of the crowd being Tiger Fans. With the unlikelyhood of the Councils and Government being prepared to upgrade these stadiums to a greater capacity, in 10 years the realisation will probably be no games at either Traditional Ground?!
@Gary Bakerloo said:That is right, but I would argue that with both Campbelltown and Leichhardt with 30,000 capacity, we could initially play 5 at each with 2 at the SFS/ANZ. "Poor" games can be taken to the SFS/ANZ where the revenue stream is underwritten.
Eventually play 6 at each and have 25,000 at each game minimum…...that is the dream.......
@Cultured Bogan said:@Gary Bakerloo said:That is right, but I would argue that with both Campbelltown and Leichhardt with 30,000 capacity, we could initially play 5 at each with 2 at the SFS/ANZ. "Poor" games can be taken to the SFS/ANZ where the revenue stream is underwritten.
Eventually play 6 at each and have 25,000 at each game minimum…...that is the dream.......
Not a bad idea at all Gary.
I fear that the Leichhardt council will knock back any further redevelopment of the Rectangle though and it will go the way of Belmore Sports Ground.
@innsaneink said:@Cultured Bogan said:@Gary Bakerloo said:That is right, but I would argue that with both Campbelltown and Leichhardt with 30,000 capacity, we could initially play 5 at each with 2 at the SFS/ANZ. "Poor" games can be taken to the SFS/ANZ where the revenue stream is underwritten.
Eventually play 6 at each and have 25,000 at each game minimum…...that is the dream.......
Not a bad idea at all Gary.
I fear that the Leichhardt council will knock back any further redevelopment of the Rectangle though and it will go the way of Belmore Sports Ground.
They dont take ''poor games''….they cherry pick the best.
They hold the cards and make the decisions.
If youre talkin one or two games I'd say only ANZ would be inetrested