Support Justin

@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I only deal in facts, not rubbish. Pascoe is a muppet. This club has been handed a golden opportunity to hire a proper CEO. Fight the fine/cap punishment, but not his de-registration.

Absolute garbage. What an insulting, unnecessary post. Pascoe has had a huge hand in raising this club out of near ruin. He should be part of our future.

What an overreaction.

Right on queue. Of course you’d defend personally insulting posts

I find it curious that you would insult another poster after vehemently attacking others for not respecting others opinions. Quite the irony. Guess all that goes out the window when something is said that you truly disagree with.

Question. If you are so against “personally insulting posts”, where are you when Greenberg gets personally insulted?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Absolute garbage. What an insulting, unnecessary post. Pascoe has had a huge hand in raising this club out of near ruin. He should be part of our future.

What an overreaction.

Right on queue. Of course you’d defend personally insulting posts

I find it curious that you would insult another poster after vehemently attacking others for not respecting others opinions. Quite the irony. Guess all that goes out the window when something is said that you truly disagree with.

Look up the definition of insult. I have insulted no one. You just like jumping all over my posts - directly and indirectly. I don’t believe Pascoe deserves to be called a muppet. I’d say my agenda towards disrespectful, personally insulting posts has been fairly consistent. But you think what you like mate. I’ll continue to post and I suppose you’ll continue to have a go. No problems.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
What an overreaction.

Right on queue. Of course you’d defend personally insulting posts

I find it curious that you would insult another poster after vehemently attacking others for not respecting others opinions. Quite the irony. Guess all that goes out the window when something is said that you truly disagree with.

Look up the definition of insult. I have insulted no one. You just like jumping all over my posts - directly and indirectly. I don’t believe Pascoe deserves to be called a muppet. I’d say my agenda towards disrespectful, personally insulting posts has been fairly consistent. But you think what you like mate. I’ll continue to post and I suppose you’ll continue to have a go. No problems.

Speaking of consistency, where are you jumping down the throats of people who insult Greenberg? It’s fine if you want to defend Pascoe, but don’t do it under false pretences. It’s transparent.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Right on queue. Of course you’d defend personally insulting posts

I find it curious that you would insult another poster after vehemently attacking others for not respecting others opinions. Quite the irony. Guess all that goes out the window when something is said that you truly disagree with.

Look up the definition of insult. I have insulted no one. You just like jumping all over my posts - directly and indirectly. I don’t believe Pascoe deserves to be called a muppet. I’d say my agenda towards disrespectful, personally insulting posts has been fairly consistent. But you think what you like mate. I’ll continue to post and I suppose you’ll continue to have a go. No problems.

Speaking of consistency, where are you jumping down the throats of people who insult Greenberg? It’s fine if you want to defend Pascoe, but don’t do it under false pretences. It’s transparent.

Thanks for the tip. I’m just writing it all down so I don’t miss anything.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I would not be upset if Justin Potato fails to get reinstated.

I just don't buy this belief that he's been fantastic. Much of the positive change at the club was done by Cleary.

Name a Wests Tigers CEO from the last 10 years who was a better CEO than Pascoe. In my opinion others were terrible and almost put the club in very severe financial positions.

I agree, but to say Pascoe is the best CEO in the WT history is to damn him with faint praise.

I said over the last 10 years.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I find it curious that you would insult another poster after vehemently attacking others for not respecting others opinions. Quite the irony. Guess all that goes out the window when something is said that you truly disagree with.

Look up the definition of insult. I have insulted no one. You just like jumping all over my posts - directly and indirectly. I don’t believe Pascoe deserves to be called a muppet. I’d say my agenda towards disrespectful, personally insulting posts has been fairly consistent. But you think what you like mate. I’ll continue to post and I suppose you’ll continue to have a go. No problems.

Speaking of consistency, where are you jumping down the throats of people who insult Greenberg? It’s fine if you want to defend Pascoe, but don’t do it under false pretences. It’s transparent.

Thanks for the tip. I’m just writing it all down so I don’t miss anything.

Haha sure you are :wink:

I’ll leave you to your faux outrage.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Look up the definition of insult. I have insulted no one. You just like jumping all over my posts - directly and indirectly. I don’t believe Pascoe deserves to be called a muppet. I’d say my agenda towards disrespectful, personally insulting posts has been fairly consistent. But you think what you like mate. I’ll continue to post and I suppose you’ll continue to have a go. No problems.

Speaking of consistency, where are you jumping down the throats of people who insult Greenberg? It’s fine if you want to defend Pascoe, but don’t do it under false pretences. It’s transparent.

Thanks for the tip. I’m just writing it all down so I don’t miss anything.

Haha sure you are :wink:

I’ll leave you to your faux outrage.

Put ya handbags away ladies
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Speaking of consistency, where are you jumping down the throats of people who insult Greenberg? It’s fine if you want to defend Pascoe, but don’t do it under false pretences. It’s transparent.

Thanks for the tip. I’m just writing it all down so I don’t miss anything.

Haha sure you are :wink:

I’ll leave you to your faux outrage.

Put ya handbags away ladies

It’s all in good fun Hap
 
Back to Pascoe I have been one of his biggest supporters from day one, but he messed up here. No conspiracies, Greenberg isn’t threatened. Pascoe just stuffed up. Hopefully he learns from it.
 
@ said:
I think the heat is getting to us all, i know after having a terrible nights sleep i am in a very snappy mood

Yep fair enough. I’m sitting on the couch with a stomach upset for past 24 hours. I’ve spent a small fortune on an upmarket harbour cruise for tonight (unlimited drinks) and I can’t eat or drink a bloody thing. So yeah, I’m a bit crabby!! 1st world problem I know😜
 
@ said:
Back to Pascoe I have been one of his biggest supporters from day one, but he messed up here. No conspiracies, Greenberg isn’t threatened. Pascoe just stuffed up. Hopefully he learns from it.

You don’t know that. The only fact about this case is that the contract was not registered with the NRL. That is the only fact that is not in dispute. Everything else needs to be decided by a court of law.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Back to Pascoe I have been one of his biggest supporters from day one, but he messed up here. No conspiracies, Greenberg isn’t threatened. Pascoe just stuffed up. Hopefully he learns from it.

You don’t know that. The only fact about this case is that the contract was not registered with the NRL. That is the only fact that is not in dispute. Everything else needs to be decided by a court of law.

If it is decided in court that he did the wrong thing, I hope it will be accepted on here. Pretty doubtful though.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Back to Pascoe I have been one of his biggest supporters from day one, but he messed up here. No conspiracies, Greenberg isn’t threatened. Pascoe just stuffed up. Hopefully he learns from it.

You don’t know that. The only fact about this case is that the contract was not registered with the NRL. That is the only fact that is not in dispute. Everything else needs to be decided by a court of law.

If it is decided in court that he did the wrong thing, I hope it will be accepted on here. Pretty doubtful though.

If it decided that way I certainly will. But at this stage of the proceeding that’s a mighty big if.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Right on queue. Of course you’d defend personally insulting posts

I find it curious that you would insult another poster after vehemently attacking others for not respecting others opinions. Quite the irony. Guess all that goes out the window when something is said that you truly disagree with.

Look up the definition of insult. I have insulted no one. You just like jumping all over my posts - directly and indirectly. I don’t believe Pascoe deserves to be called a muppet. I’d say my agenda towards disrespectful, personally insulting posts has been fairly consistent. But you think what you like mate. I’ll continue to post and I suppose you’ll continue to have a go. No problems.

Speaking of consistency, where are you jumping down the throats of people who insult Greenberg? It’s fine if you want to defend Pascoe, but don’t do it under false pretences. It’s transparent.

Greenberg deserves all he gets. He is amongst the incompetent's at NRL HQ who are playing a massive role in turning the game to crap. Haven't heard one person on here or other NRL forums who believe he is doing a good job or is even remotely trustworthy. Most think he is lacking morals and is happy to sway in the breeze on hard-pressing issues within the game.
Pascoe has not yet been proven to have done anything wrong, that is the fundamental difference between him and Greenberg. There is no comparison between those 2.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Back to Pascoe I have been one of his biggest supporters from day one, but he messed up here. No conspiracies, Greenberg isn’t threatened. Pascoe just stuffed up. Hopefully he learns from it.

You don’t know that. The only fact about this case is that the contract was not registered with the NRL. That is the only fact that is not in dispute. Everything else needs to be decided by a court of law.

If it is decided in court that he did the wrong thing, I hope it will be accepted on here. Pretty doubtful though.

If it decided that way I certainly will. But at this stage of the proceeding that’s a mighty big if.

GNR I think there's certainly more to it. Whether or not we did the wrong thing, intentionally or not, Greenturd just set us in his sights and let loose. With everything else that's happened in the last few years, now with us he goes hard and toughens up on a relatively minor thing?? I don't believe that for a second.

I don't trust him or the NRL to be impartial in this appeal either. They already made up their minds, no appeal can change that. (Only public opinion could, but I don't think it's strong enough to help us atm). Court may be our only avenue, not for the salary cap penalties, but for the underhanded manner in which they have gone about it all and tarnished Pascoe's (and ours) reputation.

Honestly, though, I don't have any faith in the courts either, the things people do with such mickey mouse penalties, so that process is just about standing up, not winning or justice.
 
@ said:
Slightly confused Mods , MadUnit replied to one of my comments last night and it is in PM's but isn't posted

What gives ??

Post contained swearing and was deleted…
 
Back
Top