@king sirro said:Been a few years since i made the track out west, any tips on parking?
Lucky if we get 10k out there…huge car park next to the ground....you'll be right
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@king sirro said:Been a few years since i made the track out west, any tips on parking?
@Tigerdon said:@doublesonthemain said:@MacDougall said:@GNR4LIFE said:I was scrolling back up when i read this so read it from the bottom up if that makes sense. Soon as i started reading i thought ''well this will be about Lovett'' and sure enough. His role as the forum whipping boy is well established already this yr. See his offload to set up Chee Kam on the weekend? Wasn't bad for a guy who doesn't have an offload. He set up a try against Manly the same way last yr. Definitely does not deserve the mud that gets thrown at him.
It was a fairly hail mary type pass but still, he tried it and it stuck so can't fault him. It looked a bit random though.
Lovett needs to improve though, he just doesn't do enough. His defense is quite poor but I do think he copped plenty when he was forced to play in the centres where he just isn't an NRL quality centre. Way too slow.
I wouldn't be surprised if he improved out of sight though. He should put on some weight and become a prop imo. He's got many of the qualities a good toiling prop has but as a backrower he just isn't dynamic enough.
I can only go by the pictures on the website but Kyle looks a little bigger to me than he did last year, looks to have filled out a little. I recall reading somewhere, on the website too I think, that he had the best record in terms of effective tackles made per game or his record for effective tackles was very good anyway. A lot of what he does goes unnoticed unless it's an error and then, of course, it is highlighted. Not saying he's terrific but he can do what he's asked to do quite well. He and Lawrence will do as much (decoy) running off the ball as they will with it and they can play 80 minutes if needed too. So there's reasons why he might be picked as well as reasons he might not be picked but that goes for almost every player especially forwards.
I had know idea that he was our most effective tackler. I knew he made a lot and go all day. When people describe Melbourne as a team with stars surrounded by robots.. Lovett would be one of these effective robots that goes about his job.
@MacDougall said:@tigertye said:Did Madness get a run in the last trial? Hasn't played since that local nines game or whatever where apparently he was best on field.
Would also much rather see Griffin get a go instead of Lovett, he can play anywhere in the forwards.
Halatau must be injured.
No Chee-Kam or Graham?
Or Addo-Carr and Parahi.
I expect McConachie, Griffin, Chee-Kam, Addo-Carr, Dallas Graham and maybe JJ Felise will be added to an extended bench if they come through the NSW Cup/NYC trials.
Happy to see Aloiai named at 15.
Weird that Rankin is wearing the 6 and Moses the 18…
@Sabre said:@Tigerdon said:@doublesonthemain said:@MacDougall said:It was a fairly hail mary type pass but still, he tried it and it stuck so can't fault him. It looked a bit random though.
Lovett needs to improve though, he just doesn't do enough. His defense is quite poor but I do think he copped plenty when he was forced to play in the centres where he just isn't an NRL quality centre. Way too slow.
I wouldn't be surprised if he improved out of sight though. He should put on some weight and become a prop imo. He's got many of the qualities a good toiling prop has but as a backrower he just isn't dynamic enough.
I can only go by the pictures on the website but Kyle looks a little bigger to me than he did last year, looks to have filled out a little. I recall reading somewhere, on the website too I think, that he had the best record in terms of effective tackles made per game or his record for effective tackles was very good anyway. A lot of what he does goes unnoticed unless it's an error and then, of course, it is highlighted. Not saying he's terrific but he can do what he's asked to do quite well. He and Lawrence will do as much (decoy) running off the ball as they will with it and they can play 80 minutes if needed too. So there's reasons why he might be picked as well as reasons he might not be picked but that goes for almost every player especially forwards.
I had know idea that he was our most effective tackler. I knew he made a lot and go all day. When people describe Melbourne as a team with stars surrounded by robots.. Lovett would be one of these effective robots that goes about his job.
I've noticed though that Lovett has a tendency to involve himself in tackles when he isn't needed. I.e the tackle is almost complete and he will come in at the last second. Often this ended up meaning we were a player short in the defensive line after a quick play the ball.
@Geo. said:@MacDougall said:@tigertye said:Did Madness get a run in the last trial? Hasn't played since that local nines game or whatever where apparently he was best on field.
Would also much rather see Griffin get a go instead of Lovett, he can play anywhere in the forwards.
Halatau must be injured.
No Chee-Kam or Graham?
Or Addo-Carr and Parahi.
I expect McConachie, Griffin, Chee-Kam, Addo-Carr, Dallas Graham and maybe JJ Felise will be added to an extended bench if they come through the NSW Cup/NYC trials.
Happy to see Aloiai named at 15.
Weird that Rankin is wearing the 6 and Moses the 18…
It's All part of the NEW game plan to confuse the opposition
@Sabre said:@Tigerdon said:@doublesonthemain said:@MacDougall said:It was a fairly hail mary type pass but still, he tried it and it stuck so can't fault him. It looked a bit random though.
Lovett needs to improve though, he just doesn't do enough. His defense is quite poor but I do think he copped plenty when he was forced to play in the centres where he just isn't an NRL quality centre. Way too slow.
I wouldn't be surprised if he improved out of sight though. He should put on some weight and become a prop imo. He's got many of the qualities a good toiling prop has but as a backrower he just isn't dynamic enough.
I can only go by the pictures on the website but Kyle looks a little bigger to me than he did last year, looks to have filled out a little. I recall reading somewhere, on the website too I think, that he had the best record in terms of effective tackles made per game or his record for effective tackles was very good anyway. A lot of what he does goes unnoticed unless it's an error and then, of course, it is highlighted. Not saying he's terrific but he can do what he's asked to do quite well. He and Lawrence will do as much (decoy) running off the ball as they will with it and they can play 80 minutes if needed too. So there's reasons why he might be picked as well as reasons he might not be picked but that goes for almost every player especially forwards.
I had know idea that he was our most effective tackler. I knew he made a lot and go all day. When people describe Melbourne as a team with stars surrounded by robots.. Lovett would be one of these effective robots that goes about his job.
I've noticed though that Lovett has a tendency to involve himself in tackles when he isn't needed. I.e the tackle is almost complete and he will come in at the last second. Often this ended up meaning we were a player short in the defensive line after a quick play the ball.
@Tigerdon said:I guess Jack Bird has played most other positions in the backline. Being a trail I guess they are willing to test him there as well.
There can't be to many positions in a footy side that that bloke can't play.
@marzie said:JAC two length of the field tries already.