Agreed the NRL do not care - especially about the tigers.
In business terms the NRL demonstrated that clearly with the first Las Vegas year and the teams the NRL showcased first.
That's compounded, with the NRL scheduling too - tigers round 1 bye twice in 2-3 years and the titans getting the other opening round bye is not a coincidence. As a business you put your best products out on opening day.
That's why
@diedpretty I asked:
1.
what conditions created this messy business structure (lack of clear defined goals of the business), - where the administration continues to ignore the club ( then intervening when O'Farrell was fired - that tells you the NRL intervene in some circumstances - then we need to ask : How does O'Farrell's (Wests Tigers) firing affect the NRL?
2. that leads to Q2, what standard is acceptable before institutions intervene?
How much damage to their product is acceptable before intervention?
I think the NRL needed to hire an independent dude/ consultant to oversee the merger. The NRL didn't.
The above arguments of local ground win rates, locations, populations and pokies and which board sits where are all downstream problems of where the real issue/power rests - the
NRL itself (the administrators) are the problem.