The flying fox

I don't mind it for brief shots.

Didn't like the Mbye interview though.
Unnecessary.

Need some hectic drone shots and angles too.
Technology is your friend.
 
@demps said in [The flying fox](/post/1362954) said:
I don't mind it for brief shots.

Didn't like the Mbye interview though.
Unnecessary.

Need some hectic drone shots and angles too.
Technology is your friend.


Sure, but when it's in your face, like the Mbye thing, I mean who asked for it or wants to see it??
 
@tiger_heart said in [The flying fox](/post/1362975) said:
@demps said in [The flying fox](/post/1362954) said:
I don't mind it for brief shots.

Didn't like the Mbye interview though.
Unnecessary.

Need some hectic drone shots and angles too.
Technology is your friend.


Sure, but when it's in your face, like the Mbye thing, I mean who asked for it or wants to see it??

Agree.
Didn't rate that.

Like the angles though.
 
Whichever genius at Fox thought it was a good idea deserves to be shot,it may suit idiotic games like AFL but it is pathetic in a contact sport
 
The smoke/mist at the start was far more annoying. Can't be good for players or fans and terrible for the TV audience.
 
Can we let the players worry about the game not what to say in an interview during the game.
The last thing Mbye needs is any distraction.
 
@tiger-tragic said in [The flying fox](/post/1363509) said:
Who asked for it? A fan survey, of course, like all PVL innovations and changes.

I have no idea but I would guess it's a Fox initiative. They're looking for new things to making paying for viewing football appear more worthwhile.

It's very hard to follow the game when the camera is moving and the directors used it too much. They'd be better off with a static camera to avoid motion issues and perspective changes.

The interview was simply ridiculous. I imagine the players would hate it.
 
Back
Top