@ said:I worked out the 56% based on your win/loss figure. How you think it's a stunning victory rate is mind boggling.
My problem is we lose money playing there based over 19 seasons seasons of crowds. It, along with CSS is holding us back.
How do people not connect the dots of making a profit and becoming a successful club?
Yeah I know, I made the mistake of initially getting my "facts" from News. The 60% figure is correct, but its no biggie. You dont think that if we have a 50% greater chance of winning at one ground compared to the others that isnt stunning? You think its a coincidence?
We dont lose money playing at leichhardt. Break even is between 11-12K. We have a CONTRACT with ANZ, for the next 5 years and that is a fixed lump sum, so Leichhardt doesnt impact that either.
You know what makes a successful club, or any business? Engaging with customers/clients. Providing them with a memorable experience, something that is exciting and will bring them back. In this day and age its something that can be neatly and photogenically framed in a insta/face/twit/chat and gets eyes looking at it. Success is ultimately dependent on $$$ and in the current business environment that $$$$ income is PURELY built on marketing and that is measured coldly and clinically by numbers of "eyes". Yesterday delivers on almost every parameter (except competition points) with mainstream media converage of "return to Leichhardt" (with boring cliched monotony), social media everywhere, news reports. IT WAS TALKED ABOUT and spread all over all forms of the media. And again today when they discuss the opportunity lost that Leichhardt didnt deliver. That is how business and marketing works these days and Leichhardt ticks those boxes for Wests Tigers. Playing Titans at ANZ (or CSS unfortunately) in front of 9000people and its simply Titans defeated Tigers.