@Snake said in [The Mole: Wests Tigers circling Manly centre](/post/1035549) said:
@gallagher This hits the nail on the head , can any body that had Teddys talent and future say they would not want to go to a club that’s run professionally, has a winning culture and is a settled organisation.
Our club has been a basket case for yrs , coaching turn overs .. CEO turnovers.. less than desirable training facilities .
I had no problem with Teddy leaving I did have a problem with the way he done it ... until our club gets its act together players of Teddy’s caliber will never be seen in a Tigers jersey ... Teddy’s not to blame the mugs that have run our club into the ground are !
Circular argument. How can the club get better when star players leave?
Take the Titans for example, probably THE rock-bottom club at this time. Financially suspect, future suspect, long history of failure and insolvency, just sacked the coach. QLD Origin coach was ID'd in the media as a replacement and pulled out the day after Brennan got the sack.
Talk of Jai Arrow leaving. What do Titans have to do to retain him? Offer him overs, media reported today 5 years $4M. So the struggling clubs are often forced to make certain high-risk deals in order to try and climb back to being a competitive and attractive location to play footy. And the higher value the deal, obviously the less salary cap space.
So it's all well and good to say "Roosters have superior management" or "I don't blame Tedesco for leaving this basketcase of a club", whilst totally ignoring how difficult it is for poor clubs to try and climb to match a level of rich clubs. So specific to Tigers, how can compare our Chairman Fatty O'Barrell with Roosters Chairman Nick Politis? One is likely a well-connected ex-pollie, the other is a definitely well-connected business leader. Difference being, Uncle Nick is worth half a billion dollars through his own business smarts and good fortune. You aren't competing on an even playing field against billionaires and movie stars. Souths can fly in Rusty and make certain deals happen.
So it goes back, the struggling clubs NEED their best players to stay, otherwise it's just self-fulfilling that they will struggle. You have to have the good players FIRST before the continued success comes.
Specifically for Tedesco, Tigers identified and developed him over a very long period. He's not just some kid we pinched from another junior catchment when he turned 18. And when he established himself as one of the best FBs in the game, he left, because REASONS.
So what do Tigers do? Make a risky deal with a fat Kiwi to sure-up the short term, sign a dwarf ex-Bulldog plying away in ESL as backup, then leap when a rep-calibre Dogs player becomes available due to Bulldogs misfortune. Fast-forward a year and the Kiwi is gone, the dwarf is the STARTING FB and fans complain that Mbye is playing Origin but not Tedesco-ing in any particular position.
All that nonsense doesn't happen if Tedesco stays. So yeah certainly management can be better, but also management has to clean up the mess when the superstar player decides to leave for his own reasons.