The next controversial call the Wests Tigers must make

Been the same since 1908, the coach is always to blame and everyone wants instant results. Like most people I would not be putting a contract in front of Taylor at present and I certainly would be making some discreet enquiries to see who else is on the market in 2018 and are they affordable.

In saying that I would be backing Taylor 100% and giving him every opportunity to succeed and with success would probably equate to a new contract.

A ball has not been kicked off in 2017 and a game has not been won or lost so the coaching thing for 2018 needs to be on the back burner for a few months. If people are worried about the big four contract negotiations , I am sure they will have clauses inserted in their contracts that gives them an out if they do not approve of the 2018 coach.

Anyway I for one would like to see Taylor succeed because that would mean our team has succeeded and going back to a new coach means another three year plan!!!
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Chris said:
If JT got his 1 year extension at the start of the season, that would give him 2 more years at the club. I'd rather wait and see how thing went and how the team were performing mid season. If we're well entrenched in the top 8, that would tell me he's on the right path and I'd give him a 2 year extension. If we're at the tail end of the season, I'd start the search for a new coach.

Agree 100%, any talk of extension before mid-season and being entrenched deep in the top 4-6 is crazy.

Give him most of the year to prove himself (un)worthy of the extension. It's not as though other clubs will be bashing the door down to take him.

If we are entrenched in the top 4-6 halfway through the season, all of a sudden, JT has the upper hand in negotiations. Think about it - he has made a big call and got a young team firing into the top 4 - he will be in demand with other clubs and his price will rise.

Extend him now for one year, we get him cheap and those coming off contract know the coaching situation for 2018.

You are looking at the best possible outcome.What if we are struggling near the bottom at the half way mark and we had already signed him for 2018.I know this is a pessimistic outcome.Lets see how he goes this year and act on that and not get ahead of ourselves.I remember how the club panicked in extending Sheens and dont want to see that error again with JT
 
@jadtiger said:
You are looking at the best possible outcome. What if we are struggling near the bottom at the half way mark and we had already signed him for 2018.

Well then we have a **cheap** coach on the books for 2018 and we can either:

- let him see out the contract and we don't renew or;
- pay him out for 2018 if a top line coach becomes available at end of 2017

This does assume the club is in a stronger financial position by the end of 2017.
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Chris said:
If JT got his 1 year extension at the start of the season, that would give him 2 more years at the club. I'd rather wait and see how thing went and how the team were performing mid season. If we're well entrenched in the top 8, that would tell me he's on the right path and I'd give him a 2 year extension. If we're at the tail end of the season, I'd start the search for a new coach.

Agree 100%, any talk of extension before mid-season and being entrenched deep in the top 4-6 is crazy.

Give him most of the year to prove himself (un)worthy of the extension. It's not as though other clubs will be bashing the door down to take him.

If we are entrenched in the top 4-6 halfway through the season, all of a sudden, JT has the upper hand in negotiations. Think about it - he has made a big call and got a young team firing into the top 4 - he will be in demand with other clubs and his price will rise.

Extend him now for one year, we get him cheap and those coming off contract know the coaching situation for 2018.

And if he Loses 6 or 7 straight, late in the season , we will have dodged a bullet if we wait and see if he is worth anything as a Coach.
 
I really don't want to be paying another coach out at all, no matter how "cheap" they are signed on for.

Like Supercoach said, get the lads to sign their contracts with a clause regarding the coach, that way you're covered.
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Chris said:
If JT got his 1 year extension at the start of the season, that would give him 2 more years at the club. I'd rather wait and see how thing went and how the team were performing mid season. If we're well entrenched in the top 8, that would tell me he's on the right path and I'd give him a 2 year extension. If we're at the tail end of the season, I'd start the search for a new coach.

Agree 100%, any talk of extension before mid-season and being entrenched deep in the top 4-6 is crazy.

Give him most of the year to prove himself (un)worthy of the extension. It's not as though other clubs will be bashing the door down to take him.

If we are entrenched in the top 4-6 halfway through the season, all of a sudden, JT has the upper hand in negotiations. Think about it - he has made a big call and got a young team firing into the top 4 - he will be in demand with other clubs and his price will rise.

Extend him now for one year, we get him cheap and those coming off contract know the coaching situation for 2018.

Do you seriously think JT's stock will rise so high after 13-odd good rounds? Take Ricky Stuart for example, 10th in 2015, but coach of the year 2016, are opposition clubs really lining up to bring him over?

I would argue that after modest improvements 15th to 9th, if he does get the team into the Top 6 in 2017 it would be a recognition of slow progress, but nothing like a master coach at work. So maybe his value goes up a bit, but that would be ok, it would be recognition of positive results and we should be paying him more anyway.

Considering that there are usually very few NRL coaching jobs on offer, and particularly right now you have well-respected guys like Ivan Cleary without a club, plus Des Hasler at very high risk to not see out his Canterbury contract, and even a guy like Toovey making noise about coming back - it's a reasonably swollen market for potential coaches right now.
 
@jirskyr said:
@Pawsandclaws said:
@Tiger4life said:
He doesnt need to exceed expectations he just has to meet them. What was the clubs 3 year plan? Top 8 last year, top 4 this year. I know you hate talking about defence but he has taken us backwards in defence. The funny part is if you call out taylor on these things its because its a personal thing, what a joke. Having an opinion on the coach does not make me or anyone else less of a supporter than someone who blindly follows the coach no matter what.

Well written. We didn't make the 8 last year and there is already talk of softening the Top 4 target this year. Why? So JT is not held accountable. The targets are a furphy, because we know JT is a protected species despite all the rhetoric which suggests otherwise. And as you have correctly written, having an opinion does not make you less or a supporter only one which recognises this club has gone backwards on the field under Taylor.

I hardly think JT is a protected species. The knives were out for him last year, and bet your bottom dollar they will be out again this year if Tigers have a run of losses. Taylor is not hugely popular across the media, not particularly respected amongst fans and under huge pressure to get a historically poor resulted team to the finals.

Or put it this way, if Taylor gets Tigers to the finals in 2017, it will be only the 4th time it's happened in 18 seasons. People can say that it's not asking much to make the finals, but clearly for the Tigers, it's asking a lot.

In terms of the public "3 year plan" for results, I think some people look into this too hard. Of course teams aim to make the finals and then improve on the previous seasons - that is standard for sports clubs and what fans expect. Nobody is going to realistically plan to come 8th in the second year and hope to achieve the same result in the 3rd year. No business sets public budgets that are flat or worse than last year, it ruins public sentiment.

So I don't think you can realistically say Tigers are softening their 3rd-year plan excessively if they are happy with less than a Top 4 finish. Nor is it realistic that they would reduce their target for the sole purpose of keeping Jason Taylor in his job as a "protected species". The club have made it clear they want management stability and intelligent spending, as much as any on-field results. Plans should also adapt based on recent performance.

In the last 5 years, only 5 sides have made the Top 4 more than once; 10 sides have made it total. It's not realistic for most clubs to think they are going to be in the Top 4 on a regular basis, that's just not how things work.

Both of you also have this thing about Tigers going backwards under Taylor. I simply can't understand how you can support this overall. I'm a stats person and in 2015 I made a point of how Tigers did better in defence versus Potter years. A lot of negative feedback was along the lines of "you can make stats say anything", "maybe we concede less points overall but our defence is not powerful enough", "sure defence was improved but our position on the table was still unacceptable", "our defence did improve but I think it was at the expense of the attack" (aka the old Taylorball argument).

So sure, defence was improved in 2015 but we came 15th, so really what good did it do us? For me, it was the start of seeing changes where I felt they were needed most, even if the results didn't come straight away. Then last year we came 9th and it sucked to miss the finals, but it was the best table result since 2011\. But no, T4L wants to go back to the defence argument now as it suits, that the defence got worse in 2016 and despite the better win frequency, we are apparently going backwards.

So if you take that approach, you will find some element of club performance that does not improve year on year. If you look hard enough, you'll find something where Taylor is overseeing some drop in performance. Of course that argument works the other way, it works that you can also find modest improvements to support the coach.

But after coming 10th, 15th, 13th, 15th since 2012, how can 9th not be an improvement? I don't get it.

Let me take you back to one game and this will tell you why defence is so important. LO round 26, season on the line, win and make semis, packed crowd, day game, beautiful weather…. Tell me the halftime score again..... Same thing a few backs against the panthers. Tigers have natural attacking flair all over the park and again I will say it Taylor's whole philosophy is about defence. You don't believe me listen to the man himself:

"_Defence is number one for us because we have been really, really poor in the past. "

"We’ve got to change that and if you want to be in the top eight in the NRL you need to get yourself up the ladder as far as the defensive performances go."_

I wouldn't know him from a bar of soap to dislike or like him. But do I dislike some of his coaching decisions yes. I would love for us to have a break out year in 2017 and make finals and if we do sure give him an extension. But if we don't then see ya later. You all gave him excuses for last year like Farah undermining him, second tier cap, young team. That's all behind us now , so no excuses this year.
 
@Newtown said:
It's called the resilience of a coach and his team. Wests Tigers have it.

Newton, we didn't just miss the 8 by a game last season it wasn't an unlucky loss that made us miss the 8.
With Four games to go we only needed two wins but we lost 3 games out of the four,
When it mattered neither the Coaching or the playing was up to it,
1 from 4 doesn't sounds much like resilience to me,
You can't throw chances like that away.
We may not get that chance again for a while .
 
@Pawsandclaws said:
@happy tiger said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@hammertime said:
???

You realise this was after JT signed right? Check the date. I posted it in hope that people would connect the timeline themselves.

The fact that was missed says a bit. Probably most of the anti JT arguments are being made from mis-information… Or an ignorance of it.

Our position was always going to be a disaster as far as the cap was concerned
If he didn't do some checking before signing, then he's also an idiot.
The cap position generally was known for a long time, and wasn't helped by his vendetta against RF. which resulted with paying most of it out for not much financial advantage.
The part that you ignore is the fact that despite all details weren't being available when he signed , most of it was pretty obvious .
Most of us here were aware that we were a basket case, yet The prospective coach wasn't?? Give us a break.
He got the job he wanted. Let's see if it's all BS, like his defensive coaching.

Are you serious GCT ??

So you think that the club would grant him access to all Wests Tigers files on players , contracts , staff before he signed ??

I don't think everyone on here had any idea what idiotic crap Mayer had done

Most on here thought the sun shone from his derriere , no matter how much you tried to warn them , all because he would get on twitter , quite ironic for that twit actually

He got the job and I'd be surprised if any other coach would of done much better given the circumstances

Let the guy serve his 3rd season and see what happens , if we don't make the 8 , he is good as gone

The debacle which resulted from JT's handling of the RF issue should have seen his appointment terminated. And you write of this fool deserving a 3rd year? Please spare me.

That was the CEO and boards fault. Should have sent him on his way at the end of 2015 rather than putting the coach up to it, and then backing down when push comes to shove.
 
@Tiger4life said:
Let me take you back to one game and this will tell you why defence is so important. LO round 26, season on the line, win and make semis, packed crowd, day game, beautiful weather…. Tell me the halftime score again..... Same thing a few backs against the panthers. Tigers have natural attacking flair all over the park and again I will say it Taylor's whole philosophy is about defence. You don't believe me listen to the man himself:

"_Defence is number one for us because we have been really, really poor in the past. "

"We’ve got to change that and if you want to be in the top eight in the NRL you need to get yourself up the ladder as far as the defensive performances go."_

I wouldn't know him from a bar of soap to dislike or like him. But do I dislike some of his coaching decisions yes. I would love for us to have a break out year in 2017 and make finals and if we do sure give him an extension. But if we don't then see ya later. You all gave him excuses for last year like Farah undermining him, second tier cap, young team. That's all behind us now , so no excuses this year.

I'm not saying that defence is unimportant.

Just that JT improved the defence in 2015, but it did not improve in 2016\. But the results came in 2016 where they did not in 2015\. Aren't we ultimately a team on the up if our ladder position improves? Defence is one predictor, but ultimately it's only wins that count?
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
@Newtown said:
It's called the resilience of a coach and his team. Wests Tigers have it.

Newton, we didn't just miss the 8 by a game last season it wasn't an unlucky loss that made us miss the 8.
With Four games to go we only needed two wins but we lost 3 games out of the four,
When it mattered neither the Coaching or the playing was up to it,
1 from 4 doesn't sounds much like resilience to me,
You can't throw chances like that away.
We may not get that chance again for a while .

I look at last season very differently. With all the drama surrounding Farah, right through from beginning to end of season, morale within the team could very easily dropped alarmingly. Instead the team continued to play with pride and surprise most pundits, including their own supporters, to finish in 9th spot, only a point out of the top eight. During the season there were two field goal attempts which made the difference to us missing on the eight. One of these was a missed attempt from Moses, close and in front of the goal posts. The other was Haynes' field goal against us in the final minutes of our match against the Titans. It is also worth noting that there were reports that a number of our team were suffering from a virus in our dismal last match of the season against Canberra.
 
You are right we only needed to get the point that we needed, but with three chances we weren't good enough.
One point that is glossed over is that we were assisted in getting to eighth spot by an unusual circumstance of Parra losing most of their points.
(Deservedly so).
No matter what the circumstances were we had the chance three times to put us in the Semis and weren't good enough each time,
Other teams higher than us had bad luck stories in games at times last year too, but they overcame that and made it.
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
You are right we only needed to get the point that we needed, but with three chances we weren't good enough.
**One point that is glossed over is that we were assisted in getting to eighth spot by an unusual circumstance of Parra losing most of their points.**
(Deservedly so).
No matter what the circumstances were we had the chance three times to put us in the Semis and weren't good enough each time,
Other teams higher than us had bad luck stories in games at times last year too, but they overcame that and made it.

It's hardly glossed over. It's been reminded to us no less than 50 times over the last few months. If you mean it's been glossed over outside the forum, maybe it is because not everyone sees our position with an asterisk next to it, because if you look hard enough every year you will find teams who exceeded expectations due to others not meeting their''s. Very weird that supporters would constantly use this argument to diminish their own team..
 
@jirskyr said:
@Tiger4life said:
Let me take you back to one game and this will tell you why defence is so important. LO round 26, season on the line, win and make semis, packed crowd, day game, beautiful weather…. Tell me the halftime score again..... Same thing a few backs against the panthers. Tigers have natural attacking flair all over the park and again I will say it Taylor's whole philosophy is about defence. You don't believe me listen to the man himself:

"_Defence is number one for us because we have been really, really poor in the past. "

"We’ve got to change that and if you want to be in the top eight in the NRL you need to get yourself up the ladder as far as the defensive performances go."_

I wouldn't know him from a bar of soap to dislike or like him. But do I dislike some of his coaching decisions yes. I would love for us to have a break out year in 2017 and make finals and if we do sure give him an extension. But if we don't then see ya later. You all gave him excuses for last year like Farah undermining him, second tier cap, young team. That's all behind us now , so no excuses this year.

I'm not saying that defence is unimportant.

Just that JT improved the defence in 2015, but it did not improve in 2016\. But the results came in 2016 where they did not in 2015\. Aren't we ultimately a team on the up if our ladder position improves? Defence is one predictor, but ultimately it's only wins that count?

Tbh it's one of the main reasons I'm not as taken with out improvement in 2016 as others are.
Would have to think that copping 600+ in the against column doesn't correlate with many teams outside the bottom 2 or 3, so I feel we were a bit of a statistical outlier in that sense.
We'll need a significantly better defensive record to make the 8 in 2017, and I'm struggling to see how or why that'll happen.
 
@ricksen said:
@jirskyr said:
@Tiger4life said:
Let me take you back to one game and this will tell you why defence is so important. LO round 26, season on the line, win and make semis, packed crowd, day game, beautiful weather…. Tell me the halftime score again..... Same thing a few backs against the panthers. Tigers have natural attacking flair all over the park and again I will say it Taylor's whole philosophy is about defence. You don't believe me listen to the man himself:

"_Defence is number one for us because we have been really, really poor in the past. "

"We’ve got to change that and if you want to be in the top eight in the NRL you need to get yourself up the ladder as far as the defensive performances go."_

I wouldn't know him from a bar of soap to dislike or like him. But do I dislike some of his coaching decisions yes. I would love for us to have a break out year in 2017 and make finals and if we do sure give him an extension. But if we don't then see ya later. You all gave him excuses for last year like Farah undermining him, second tier cap, young team. That's all behind us now , so no excuses this year.

I'm not saying that defence is unimportant.

Just that JT improved the defence in 2015, but it did not improve in 2016\. But the results came in 2016 where they did not in 2015\. Aren't we ultimately a team on the up if our ladder position improves? Defence is one predictor, but ultimately it's only wins that count?

Tbh it's one of the main reasons I'm not as taken with out improvement in 2016 as others are.
Would have to think that copping 600+ in the against column doesn't correlate with many teams outside the bottom 2 or 3, so I feel we were a bit of a statistical outlier in that sense.
We'll need a significantly better defensive record to make the 8 in 2017, and I'm struggling to see how or why that'll happen.

It's a an outlier with an obvious explanation - the two games against Canberra where we conceded a total of 112 points. We were generally competitive in games and only got towelled up on a few occasions - Canberra twice, the Dogs, the Roosters and Penrith when they were on the charge to the finals.
 
@Nelson said:
@ricksen said:
@jirskyr said:
@Tiger4life said:
Let me take you back to one game and this will tell you why defence is so important. LO round 26, season on the line, win and make semis, packed crowd, day game, beautiful weather…. Tell me the halftime score again..... Same thing a few backs against the panthers. Tigers have natural attacking flair all over the park and again I will say it Taylor's whole philosophy is about defence. You don't believe me listen to the man himself:

"_Defence is number one for us because we have been really, really poor in the past. "

"We’ve got to change that and if you want to be in the top eight in the NRL you need to get yourself up the ladder as far as the defensive performances go."_

I wouldn't know him from a bar of soap to dislike or like him. But do I dislike some of his coaching decisions yes. I would love for us to have a break out year in 2017 and make finals and if we do sure give him an extension. But if we don't then see ya later. You all gave him excuses for last year like Farah undermining him, second tier cap, young team. That's all behind us now , so no excuses this year.

I'm not saying that defence is unimportant.

Just that JT improved the defence in 2015, but it did not improve in 2016\. But the results came in 2016 where they did not in 2015\. Aren't we ultimately a team on the up if our ladder position improves? Defence is one predictor, but ultimately it's only wins that count?

Tbh it's one of the main reasons I'm not as taken with out improvement in 2016 as others are.
Would have to think that copping 600+ in the against column doesn't correlate with many teams outside the bottom 2 or 3, so I feel we were a bit of a statistical outlier in that sense.
We'll need a significantly better defensive record to make the 8 in 2017, and I'm struggling to see how or why that'll happen.

It's a an outlier with an obvious explanation - the two games against Canberra where we conceded a total of 112 points. We were generally competitive in games and only got towelled up on a few occasions - Canberra twice, the Dogs, the Roosters and Penrith when they were on the charge to the finals.

Being completely non competitive in just over 20% of our games is terrible.It shows a complete lack of mental toughness that they disintegrate when the going gets difficult.
 
@Tiger4life said:
@jirskyr said:
@Pawsandclaws said:
@Tiger4life said:
He doesnt need to exceed expectations he just has to meet them. What was the clubs 3 year plan? Top 8 last year, top 4 this year. I know you hate talking about defence but he has taken us backwards in defence. The funny part is if you call out taylor on these things its because its a personal thing, what a joke. Having an opinion on the coach does not make me or anyone else less of a supporter than someone who blindly follows the coach no matter what.

Well written. We didn't make the 8 last year and there is already talk of softening the Top 4 target this year. Why? So JT is not held accountable. The targets are a furphy, because we know JT is a protected species despite all the rhetoric which suggests otherwise. And as you have correctly written, having an opinion does not make you less or a supporter only one which recognises this club has gone backwards on the field under Taylor.

I hardly think JT is a protected species. The knives were out for him last year, and bet your bottom dollar they will be out again this year if Tigers have a run of losses. Taylor is not hugely popular across the media, not particularly respected amongst fans and under huge pressure to get a historically poor resulted team to the finals.

Or put it this way, if Taylor gets Tigers to the finals in 2017, it will be only the 4th time it's happened in 18 seasons. People can say that it's not asking much to make the finals, but clearly for the Tigers, it's asking a lot.

In terms of the public "3 year plan" for results, I think some people look into this too hard. Of course teams aim to make the finals and then improve on the previous seasons - that is standard for sports clubs and what fans expect. Nobody is going to realistically plan to come 8th in the second year and hope to achieve the same result in the 3rd year. No business sets public budgets that are flat or worse than last year, it ruins public sentiment.

So I don't think you can realistically say Tigers are softening their 3rd-year plan excessively if they are happy with less than a Top 4 finish. Nor is it realistic that they would reduce their target for the sole purpose of keeping Jason Taylor in his job as a "protected species". The club have made it clear they want management stability and intelligent spending, as much as any on-field results. Plans should also adapt based on recent performance.

In the last 5 years, only 5 sides have made the Top 4 more than once; 10 sides have made it total. It's not realistic for most clubs to think they are going to be in the Top 4 on a regular basis, that's just not how things work.

Both of you also have this thing about Tigers going backwards under Taylor. I simply can't understand how you can support this overall. I'm a stats person and in 2015 I made a point of how Tigers did better in defence versus Potter years. A lot of negative feedback was along the lines of "you can make stats say anything", "maybe we concede less points overall but our defence is not powerful enough", "sure defence was improved but our position on the table was still unacceptable", "our defence did improve but I think it was at the expense of the attack" (aka the old Taylorball argument).

So sure, defence was improved in 2015 but we came 15th, so really what good did it do us? For me, it was the start of seeing changes where I felt they were needed most, even if the results didn't come straight away. Then last year we came 9th and it sucked to miss the finals, but it was the best table result since 2011\. But no, T4L wants to go back to the defence argument now as it suits, that the defence got worse in 2016 and despite the better win frequency, we are apparently going backwards.

So if you take that approach, you will find some element of club performance that does not improve year on year. If you look hard enough, you'll find something where Taylor is overseeing some drop in performance. Of course that argument works the other way, it works that you can also find modest improvements to support the coach.

But after coming 10th, 15th, 13th, 15th since 2012, how can 9th not be an improvement? I don't get it.

Let me take you back to one game and this will tell you why defence is so important. LO round 26, season on the line, win and make semis, packed crowd, day game, beautiful weather…. Tell me the halftime score again..... Same thing a few backs against the panthers. Tigers have natural attacking flair all over the park and again I will say it Taylor's whole philosophy is about defence. You don't believe me listen to the man himself:

"_Defence is number one for us because we have been really, really poor in the past. "

"We’ve got to change that and if you want to be in the top eight in the NRL you need to get yourself up the ladder as far as the defensive performances go."_

I wouldn't know him from a bar of soap to dislike or like him. But do I dislike some of his coaching decisions yes. I would love for us to have a break out year in 2017 and make finals and if we do sure give him an extension. But if we don't then see ya later. You all gave him excuses for last year like Farah undermining him, second tier cap, young team. That's all behind us now , so no excuses this year.

Jason Taylor must have missed at least 30-40 tackles that day …

What .... he didn't play .... your kidding right ...... you get the picture
 
@innsaneink said:
14 other teams were assisted by Parras cock ups… Though you'd think reading here it was only us

It didn't matter to a lot of them especially the ones in the bottom 4or 5\. But it did to us
It wasn't the only factor ,but for us it was important
Our biggest failing was not being able to win 2 from the last 4.
 
Back
Top