The Salary Cap

Fumbles

New member
I might be a bit dumb but can someone please explain to me How we are on our cap limit and not in the market for quality NRL players ?
I don't understand any of it, we have a team of reserve graders and we can't buy anyone because we are on our limit. I just don't get it.
 
Firstly if you look at our squad against any other NRL side (bar 1-2) it looks very week and lacking in depth. If it is a level playing field we have a lot of ordinary players compared to other clubs.

From my understanding the reason we are at the cap is that we have overpaid many players in our squad. Many of them are on back ended deals which mean they get paid a lot more money in the last years of their contracts and less in earlier years.

In my opinion we have overpaid massively many of our young players to get them to sign 3-4 year deals, they are being paid well above their current level of ability in the hope they reach their full potential. To be fair a lot of clubs have been trying to cherry pick our best juniors and only time will tell if this is the right or wrong way to go.

In reality their is no salary cap for the top sides as you can put a player on minimal money and top him up massively with Third Party Agreements. This works great for clubs like the Broncos, Roosters etc that have plenty of high profile backers. For us we have bugger all sponsorship money let alone a lot of other Third Party money.

Our club is at a crossroads, only strong leadership can steer it back on course.
 
To be fair, I believe the present management is attempting to address the issue. We know two of our senior players on good money have been called in and informed they are free to leave if they can find better elsewhere. Let's hope they can.
 
'better elsewhere' is 1 of the problems… No NRL Team will meet or pay above a current registered NRL Contract. They would be stupid to do so [unless its Marty Taupau]!

They will only take Player A on ?#$% and we have to continue to pay the remainder of the registered contract.

This technically reduces our salary cap moving forward and is possibly one of the reasons we seem to exhaust the cap?

But realistically, I very much doubt we have exhausted our Salary Cap. I feel the Board has set a Salary Budget we must operate at, built around our income levels to ensure we trade responsibly.
 
@Tiger Watto said:
'better elsewhere' is 1 of the problems… No NRL Team will meet or pay above a current registered NRL Contract. They would be stupid to do so [unless its Marty Taupau]!

They will only take Player A on ?#$% and we have to continue to pay the remainder of the registered contract.

This technically reduces our salary cap moving forward and is possibly one of the reasons we seem to exhaust the cap?

But realistically, I very much doubt we have exhausted our Salary Cap. I feel the Board has set a Salary Budget we must operate at, built around our income levels to ensure we trade responsibly.

I'm almost certain you must spend "X" percentage of the cap. You can't operate too far under either, otherwise poor clubs would be funnelling large parts of their grant into the operational costs and perpetually run in the bottom four.

I think it is as simple as our cap has been grossly mismanaged with backloaded contracts, bringing players up through mass injuries, players on good coin not performing and locking up juniors on big money.
 
We just need to become as ruthless as the other clubs at the top of the tree and become better at managing our cap , TPA's and bend every other rule as close to the wind as possible
 
I think we may be at our own cap limit
Penrith are at there cap limit but that limit is lower than the NRL limit , going on what Phil Gould said
I would like to know who has been told to look also where to trim us up a bit more
 
@Bones said:
I'm pretty sure the Greek government is looking after our salary cap.

I like this one. I don't get how we are close to the cap. I think we must be paying Robbie and Woods overs. That's all I can think of.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Tiger Watto said:
'better elsewhere' is 1 of the problems… No NRL Team will meet or pay above a current registered NRL Contract. They would be stupid to do so [unless its Marty Taupau]!

They will only take Player A on ?#$% and we have to continue to pay the remainder of the registered contract.

This technically reduces our salary cap moving forward and is possibly one of the reasons we seem to exhaust the cap?

But realistically, I very much doubt we have exhausted our Salary Cap. I feel the Board has set a Salary Budget we must operate at, built around our income levels to ensure we trade responsibly.

I'm almost certain you must spend "X" percentage of the cap. You can't operate too far under either, otherwise poor clubs would be funnelling large parts of their grant into the operational costs and perpetually run in the bottom four.

I think it is as simple as our cap has been grossly mismanaged with backloaded contracts, bringing players up through mass injuries, players on good coin not performing and locking up juniors on big money.

There is no rules in how much you must spend CB… Noyce successfully did it while at the club in the late 00's.

Same goes for the NRL Grant. Its intended to cover the Salary Cap, but clubs are free to use the grant as general income.
 
@foreveratiger said:
The money from the NRL is what is keeping us alive and that is probably the truth .

But that is probably the case for 12 of the 16 teams FT

Very few would be making a profit
 
@happy tiger said:
@foreveratiger said:
The money from the NRL is what is keeping us alive and that is probably the truth .

But that is probably the case for 12 of the 16 teams FT

Very few would be making a profit

Exactly - I don't see this as an issue at all. TV rights are the big money earner.
 
@stevetiger said:
@Bones said:
I'm pretty sure the Greek government is looking after our salary cap.

I like this one. I don't get how we are close to the cap. I think we must be paying Robbie and Woods overs. That's all I can think of.

We are grossly overpaying grossly under performing players in the top 25… Simple

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
Its obvious to blind Freddie our cap is not the problem rather our bank balance. I think you will find a part of the salary cap money is going into day to day running of the club.

Said it before, its the classic catch 22…money will fix our problems but we can not generate money while the team is in the cellar
 
@Tiger Watto said:
Same goes for the NRL Grant. Its intended to cover the Salary Cap, but clubs are free to use the grant as general income.

I did not know that, I thought the NRL had pretty much taken over payroll and were paying players directly. What you're saying is the cap money could be getting eaten up meeting the club's other obligations. With half the merger bankrupt, a lawsuit from our old coach and two unprofitable home grounds to maintain, Wests Tigers could take some big bites out of $5mil a year.
 
@Tiger Watto said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Tiger Watto said:
'better elsewhere' is 1 of the problems… No NRL Team will meet or pay above a current registered NRL Contract. They would be stupid to do so [unless its Marty Taupau]!

They will only take Player A on ?#$% and we have to continue to pay the remainder of the registered contract.

This technically reduces our salary cap moving forward and is possibly one of the reasons we seem to exhaust the cap?

But realistically, I very much doubt we have exhausted our Salary Cap. I feel the Board has set a Salary Budget we must operate at, built around our income levels to ensure we trade responsibly.

I'm almost certain you must spend "X" percentage of the cap. You can't operate too far under either, otherwise poor clubs would be funnelling large parts of their grant into the operational costs and perpetually run in the bottom four.

I think it is as simple as our cap has been grossly mismanaged with backloaded contracts, bringing players up through mass injuries, players on good coin not performing and locking up juniors on big money.

There is no rules in how much you must spend CB… Noyce successfully did it while at the club in the late 00's.

Same goes for the NRL Grant. Its intended to cover the Salary Cap, but clubs are free to use the grant as general income.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top