JD Tiger
New member
@Sart0ri That's what I said. Lol. Though yes Mr Russell undoubtedly said it much much better than I.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@NT_Tiger said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066277) said:@Geo Hold it. This thread is devolving into personal attacks. Where's a mod when you need it?
@cochise said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066280) said:The issue I have with organised religion is the disgusting acts that have been done in the name of religion over the centuries, the amounts of deaths that can be directly attributed to religion. Then you have the disgusting behaviour of the Catholic Church, behaviour that still continues today. I have no doubt that their is not a god, what almighty being would allow people who claim to be his representatives on earth to display such conduct in their name?
@mike said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066294) said:Let’s round the figures to make it easier. There are approximately 4,200 religions. Each believe the other 4,199 religions are wrong. Non-believers think 4,200 religions are wrong. Go figure.
@Sart0ri said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066271) said:Russell's teapot is an analogy, formulated by the philosopher Bertrand Russell (1872–1970), to illustrate that the philosophic burden of proof lies upon a person making unfalsifiable claims, rather than shifting the burden of disproof to others.
Russell specifically applied his analogy in the context of religion. He wrote that if he were to assert, without offering proof, that a teapot, too small to be seen by telescopes, orbits the Sun somewhere in space between the Earth and Mars, he could not expect anyone to believe him solely because his assertion could not be proven wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot
@happy_tiger said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066291) said:@cochise said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066280) said:The issue I have with organised religion is the disgusting acts that have been done in the name of religion over the centuries, the amounts of deaths that can be directly attributed to religion. Then you have the disgusting behaviour of the Catholic Church, behaviour that still continues today. I have no doubt that their is not a god, what almighty being would allow people who claim to be his representatives on earth to display such conduct in their name?
And the same could be said about Political Parties .......how many sports supporters have been killed because of who they support ....where do you draw a line
@Newtown said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066301) said:What is this thread going to achieve besides making enemies amongst Forumers?
@Newtown said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066297) said:@mike said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066294) said:Let’s round the figures to make it easier. There are approximately 4,200 religions. Each believe the other 4,199 religions are wrong. Non-believers think 4,200 religions are wrong. Go figure.
There are 16 teams in the NRL and the supporters of each team believe that the supporters of each team believe that the supporters of each other team are backing the wrong team. Some things never change so why argue?