Tigers boss not convinced new board can decide on coach

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
Wests Tigers boss not convinced new board can decide on coach

Date
August 2, 2014 - 1:48AM

Brad Walter
Chief Rugby League Writer
\
\
Wests Tigers chairman Mike Bailey has questioned whether a new NRL-controlled board due to take control of the club will be qualified to decide who should coach the team next season.

Bailey, who admitted the directors had delayed making a call on the future of Mick Potter because they thought it should be left to the new board, said he had no firm idea when the transition would take place. The NRL has finished interviewing candidates for the three independent positions on the revamped board and Fairfax Media was told earlier this week the composition of the board, which will include two Wests directors and two Balmain directors, would be finalised by the end of this month.

With the Balmain directors not having any voting rights until a $4 million loan is repaid to the NRL, the board will be controlled by the three NRL appointed directors. But even if they were to take up their positions within that time frame, the independent directors would have little idea of determining whether Potter deserved a new deal or should be replaced by one of his assistants, David Kidwell or Todd Payten.

"That is something we are obviously aware of," Bailey said. "It is hard for a new board, particularly given the fact that the independent directors are not supposed to have any connection to the club, to come out of nowhere and say we will take candidate A over candidate B. But it is all guesswork at the moment. Every time they [the NRL] have given us a time limit, that time limit has well and truly expired and as a result we just don't know where we are on that front. If they are not appointed reasonably quickly – in other words around the end of the season – it will be impossible for them to make the decision."

Speculation about whether Potter would be offered an extension on his two-year deal, which expires at the end of the season, has dragged on for months but Bailey said the present 10-member board – comprising five directors from Balmain and five from the Wests group – had felt the new board should appoint the coach. It had been expected he would be sacked at an emergency board meeting after last Sunday's match against St George Illawarra but the directors deferred a decision on the coaching position until the end of the season, which could be in five weeks if the Tigers miss out on a place in the final eight.

"I think one of the reasons why we were not racing to try to make a decision for next year, which had been conveyed to our coaches, was that we were potentially waiting for them [the new directors] to come on board," Bailey said. "But we don't know when that will be and the NRL has said they are still working on it."
Wests Tigers chairman Mike Bailey.

Fairfax Media has been told the NRL has narrowed candidates for the three board positions to a shortlist of nine, with at least one female director. The Tigers host Melbourne at Campbelltown Stadium on Monday and captain Robbie Farah allayed any doubts about him playing when he turned up for training on Friday after being given leave to deal with the stress from the fallout over Gorden Tallis' accusation he had been told by the NSW Origin hooker last year that Potter "can't coach".

Farah is still understood to be furious with Tigers chief executive Grant Mayer after comments he made supporting Potter at a news conference last Saturday were edited from a video initially posted on the club's website, but he was reported to be in good spirits when he attended a video session with teammates and did ball work at Concord Oval. Halfback Luke Brooks and prop Keith Galloway trained with the team but did not do any contact work as they race against the clock to recover from shoulder injuries sustained in the 28-12 loss to the Dragons.
 
Err on the side of caution and all that

While a new coach doesnt automatically mean the work Potter has put in will be for nothing, it can often be a step back to square one as such

The review was put in place for the benefit of the new incoming board.

Theres no such luxury for a new coach, unless its an assistant already knowledgeable of the inner workings of the joint.
 
When I read that article, all i get out of it is that its an admission of failure by the board… they were unable to make a concrete decision, possibly due to public backlash, and in turn lumped the white elephant onto a new board in which they have no faith in either.

Pathetic.
 
The current board, containing members who were involved in all the crazy crap that went on with Sheens; last contract and his sacking, and want to sack a coach who has righted the ship, are concerned that the new board don't have enough experience or knowledge to decide on the coaching issue.

You know what Mike.

I have two cats and my neighbour has a dog. I think after some careful negotiation, I can acquire the services of the neighbor's dog, to accompany my cats and have them replace the current members of the Wests Tigers board and I'd be certain they'd do a much better job.
 
Back to the Weather desk Mike…it really is a sad state of affairs...Potter deserves another year for the sake of stability..I'd trust the the independent NRL board members can see that...
 
@madunit said:
The current board, containing members who were involved in all the crazy crap that went on with Sheens; last contract and his sacking, and want to sack a coach who has righted the ship, are concerned that the new board don't have enough experience or knowledge to decide on the coaching issue.

You know what Mike.

**I have two cats and my neighbour has a dog. I think after some careful negotiation, I can acquire the services of the neighbor's dog, to accompany my cats and have them replace the current members of the Wests Tigers board and I'd be certain they'd do a much better job.**

They'd probably fight less.
 
It's wonderful that Bailey has come up and put his name to his opinion instead of leaking to the media and blaming senior players, but the reality is that it's too little too late. The current board had the opportunity to steady the ship and re-sign Potter, but they failed to do so. Bailey and his merry band of clowns should do the right thing, shut up and fade into the obscurity and irrelevancy they so richly deserve.
 
….and now for todays weather:

"We, the board are unsure after two years on whether to re-sign the NRL coach."
"We are unsure if the new board will immediately know whether to re-sign the NRL coach."
"We had a meeting planned, we were going to terminate his services"
"We changed our mind until the end of the year when the new board is in place and will have less of an idea than we do"
"We are in control"
"My hands are warm under my thighs"
 
From a governance perspective, what Bailey says is 100% correct. The new board should be responsible for the performance of the coach for next season, hence they should make the decision. Whether they can make the decision, well as noted above, that is the reason for the report completed by Smith.

There is so much common corporate sense in what Bailey has stated (assuming on behalf of the current board), it is amazing they did not feel it necessary to explain this last weekend, or even the week before etc. The decision by the board was right, how it has been communicated is the debacle.
 
Sheens was sacked because senior players didnt want him. Sheens said as much last year with Bellamy on pay tv.

Either way the board was screwed because either they sacked Sheens or benji and other walked which they did later however if the board didnt bend over for them at the time thr media would have carved them for nit doing enough to keep senior players.

Either way I want Potter retained but I don't want the club run by the NRL.
 
Now let me start by saying that I come from the magpie side of the supporter base.
But can somebody explain to me how is it that the balmain side has fallen short in their side of payments. Therefore asking the nrl to lend them the money, from their half.
Why is it that the wests get 2 people on the new board, but balmain get 2 and independent 3? Now I can understand the independents having 3 to be able to overrule one faction or another. But I find it completely unfair that balmain keep equal share with wests, they are the ones that needed the handout not wests.
It should be 3 independent, 3 wests, 1 balmain or something like that to be fair. Until balmain are able to pay their way.
 
@lathami said:
Why is it that the wests get 2 people on the new board, but balmain get 2 and independent 3? Now I can understand the independents having 3 to be able to overrule one faction or another. But I find it completely unfair that balmain keep equal share with wests, they are the ones that needed the handout not wests.
It should be 3 independent, 3 wests, 1 balmain or something like that to be fair. Until balmain are able to pay their way.

Did you miss this part of the article….

@willow said:
With the Balmain directors not having any voting rights until a $4 million loan is repaid to the NRL, the board will be controlled by the three NRL appointed directors.
 
@lathami said:
Now let me start by saying that I come from the magpie side of the supporter base.
But can somebody explain to me how is it that the balmain side has fallen short in their side of payments. Therefore asking the nrl to lend them the money, from their half.
Why is it that the wests get 2 people on the new board, but balmain get 2 and independent 3? Now I can understand the independents having 3 to be able to overrule one faction or another. But I find it completely unfair that balmain keep equal share with wests, they are the ones that needed the handout not wests.
It should be 3 independent, 3 wests, 1 balmain or something like that to be fair. Until balmain are able to pay their way.

It's posts like this which keep fanning the balmain v wests crapfest on here.
 
All I can see happening with the new board which will be controlled by the NRL is relocation to WA which will mean the death of both Balmain and the Pies. Its funny how none of the Super League clubs have been forced to merge and/or relocate.
 
@TJL said:
All I can see happening with the new board which will be controlled by the NRL is relocation to WA which will mean the death of both Balmain and the Pies. Its funny how none of the Super League clubs have been forced to merge and/or relocate.

Hunter Mariners, Adelaide Rams & Western Reds are all having the bye weekend.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 

Latest posts

Back
Top