diedpretty
Well-known member
@helmesy said:@shane2801 said:As an old Magpies fan if it is true that the Balmain side of the venture isn't keeping up their end of their payments then this really sickens me. When the merger took place I embraced it straight away but through the years I have noticed Wests have become less and less a part of this. Leichhardt this, Black & Gold that…
Honestly, I could live with WSFC taking this all over and moving to Perth. Id rather see my team every second week then the current situation.
Again, I only feel this way if Balmain are not paying their way.
I'm sure Balmain would pay if they could.
I'm sure they would too - but that is not the point - too many people are looking solely at the football perspective of this topic - the Wests Group would be looking at this from a business perspective - they entered into a partnership agreement with another party to fund WT - that paarty is now not meeting its finacial committments and the Wests Group have every legal right to look at what options are available to it - in a normal business in this situation the partnership would be dissolved and the finacial partner given the opportunity to buy out the others share - this is all hypothetical of course because whatit comes down to is what was written in to the original agreement should one side not be able to meet its financial committments and as far as i know none of us on this forum have a clue what that is.