gallagher
Well-known member
@glebe_tiger said:A lot of people point to the Canterbury and Souths examples for success at ANZ. Their move was easier, no joint ventures, pretty much one set of fans so to speak.
I think the sensible option is to wean the fans away from the suburban grounds over a planned period of seasons. Currently there are 4 games at each. This should be revised to 3, then 2 but ultimately i think there should **always** be a game at each no matter how much ANZ pay.
To lose these venues purely on costs alone would be criminal. Either way, best to wait end see what comes of council discussions with the club end of this month.
I dont understand how you think the move for canterbury fans would have easier compared to us.