Tigers v Raiders live game thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
We as a team get most of the 50-50 calls go against us more times than not, it's definitely not even.

Madge should definitely go off in the press about that. Worth a fine, who cares if they fine us, we might get a more fair deal in the future.

That aside, we lost because of poor decisions giving the possession away. Packer, blew his final chance. And Brooks, really I'd sign Sezer like the rumours say.
 
@JRDee said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161939) said:
That’s the problem with this 6 again BS , instead of us getting a penalty we drop it next pass where is our advantage ?

Don't drop it then.
 
@Snake said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161955) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161894) said:
Hook Brooks

6 Reynolds
7 Marshall

If the coach is serious Brooks should be dropped , you have to have a 1/2 that creates something not just catch / pass and kick . Anyway another season of no finals footy .. if you want to succeed you have to make the hard choices !

Exactly....I’m just waiting for the Brooks fanciers to put up some stats ?
 
@cochise said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161946) said:
We didn't have enough attack in us tonight, defense was strong but I don't think there are enough points in Brooks and Reynolds to play them together.

Agree. With the exception of AD we never looked like doing much in attack. Benji needs to be there, we score a lot more points with him
 
@Snake said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161955) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161894) said:
Hook Brooks

6 Reynolds
7 Marshall

If the coach is serious Brooks should be dropped , you have to have a 1/2 that creates something not just catch / pass and kick . Anyway another season of no finals footy .. if you want to succeed you have to make the hard choices !

Problem is he only did 2 of those, he didn't kick.

(Wasn't too flash at catching either.)
 
@mike said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161967) said:
Lawrence and Brooks need a rest next week.

Agreed. Garner back in and MCK looked alright.
 
@cochise said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161962) said:
@JRDee said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161939) said:
That’s the problem with this 6 again BS , instead of us getting a penalty we drop it next pass where is our advantage ?

Don't drop it then.

Shouldn’t come to that if we are 1 point down with 1 second to go why can’t we get a penalty and kick for goal ?
 
Disappointed with the result (and the refereeing) but overall pleased with the effort. I think the turning point was the dropped ball that was awarded a penalty against us.
I'm sure when it's brought up with the referee's boss they will simply say "you could have challenged it". It gives the refs a safety net for a poor decision. It actually demonstrates the ref gave the decision without seeing what happened because it was obvious there were no hands anywhere near it.
 
@StarswithStripes said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161947) said:
Based on Madge’s thinking from last week, Brook’s should be dropped next week.

Now you see if the cultural change is real or just talk ! I will go for the latter ..
 
@TheDaBoss said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161929) said:
that will do me for the night

Get your p’s and you’ll be free to do skids instead of watching this crap 😂
 
@Hangonaminute said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161903) said:
@Wombat said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161882) said:
@Snake said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161871) said:
@Wombat said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161861) said:
@Hangonaminute said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161852) said:
Now Brooks wants to play when the game is over

Have you not been watching the game?

Actually Brooks has done nothing again !

Well we would be 14-0 without him?

Anyone could have scored that try, it was an opportunistic try

ha ha - Ok then, glad he took his opportunity to beat Curtis Scott to the line, I'm glad you wear your bias on your sleeve though (Just like a certain ref tonight)
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161964) said:
@cochise said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161946) said:
We didn't have enough attack in us tonight, defense was strong but I don't think there are enough points in Brooks and Reynolds to play them together.

Agree. With the exception of AD we never looked like doing much in attack. Benji needs to be there, we score a lot more points with him

It was discussed that Benji always causes trouble for the Raiders' defence. The bloke who replaced him is one of our highest paid players.
 
@JRDee said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161972) said:
@cochise said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161962) said:
@JRDee said in [Tigers v Raiders live game thread](/post/1161939) said:
That’s the problem with this 6 again BS , instead of us getting a penalty we drop it next pass where is our advantage ?

Don't drop it then.

Shouldn’t come to that if we are 1 point down with 1 second to go why can’t we get a penalty and kick for goal ?

Because that is not the rule
 
Better effort but not good enough. Too many errors and dumb penalties. Raiders probably should’ve won by 30 we were camped on our own goal line all game. Barely got in the raiders 20 all game
 
We put in tonight. The last two games sum us up really. Don’t show up one week. Then try our guts out the next but without executing 100% and we get punished for our errors and don’t have the game breaking ability to overcome that or put sides away. The refereeing was appalling though tonight. Was good to see Packer one last time as well.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top