TODDY ON SHAKEY GROUND

[Alex Seyfarth's #1 Fan]

TBH I don't think much will change if Todd Greenburg is removed. The only thing that can change by replacing a CEO is the PR (Todd mostly generate negative headlines). Like most governance organisations, the head is merely a puppet.

 

[jirskyr]

TBH I don’t think much will change if Todd Greenburg is removed. The only thing that can change by replacing a CEO is the PR (Todd mostly generate negative headlines).

I agree with this quite a lot. Not so much about the puppet part, but I just really don't think all too much changes because the CEO changes - same as the country doesn't suddenly about-turn because the Prime Minister changes.

Todd Greenberg is a really easy target - his background (Bulldogs), his politician-type speaking (lacks authenticity), frankly he has a fairly punchable head. Fans like to dislike Greenberg, it's almost become a cliche.

In contrast, David Gallop was moderately popular. But did Gallop hit home runs every year? Certainly not. I don't think he performed any better than Greenberg has, and certainly no fewer controversies, salary cap or reffing issues.

But you know who presided over the biggest TV rights deal in all of NRL history? Dave Smith. A Welsh banking rugby enthusiast who couldn't tell Ben Barba from Benji Marshall. Smith wasn't even prominent enough to be disliked - fans barely knew anything about him and he flew under the radar for most of his 3-year tenure.

 

[rustycage]

I think most find Greenberg a smug little lying so and so. Rugby league started as a working mans game. And if you look at the vast majority of players, it still is. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to play it, to follow it or support it. It's a simple game, but he seems to complicate things and we don't like it. And he (it seems to many) blatantly favours the high flying clubs. Whether or not that's factual, it's definitely perceived that way. He has a very poor "common mans perception radar" for some of the most basic of decisions he's made. Mrs. Smiths Ring Gate was a doozy.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

TBH I don’t think much will change if Todd Greenburg is removed. The only thing that can change by replacing a CEO is the PR (Todd mostly generate negative headlines).

I agree with this quite a lot. Not so much about the puppet part, but I just really don't think all too much changes because the CEO changes - same as the country doesn't suddenly about-turn because the Prime Minister changes.

Todd Greenberg is a really easy target - his background (Bulldogs), his politician-type speaking (lacks authenticity), frankly he has a fairly punchable head. Fans like to dislike Greenberg, it's almost become a cliche.

In contrast, David Gallop was moderately popular. But did Gallop hit home runs every year? Certainly not. I don't think he performed any better than Greenberg has, and certainly no fewer controversies, salary cap or reffing issues.

But you know who presided over the biggest TV rights deal in all of NRL history? Dave Smith. A Welsh banking rugby enthusiast who couldn't tell Ben Barba from Benji Marshall. Smith wasn't even prominent enough to be disliked - fans barely knew anything about him and he flew under the radar for most of his 3-year tenure.

Gallop was moderately popular? Maybe among ex-SL fans. Anyone whose club was a victim of the NRL rationalisation generally hate the bloke due to his part as a legal eagle for News/SL.

Wound up even being hated by the fans of the News darling Melbourne Storm.

 

[Masterton]

TBH I don't think much will change if Todd Greenburg is removed. The only thing that can change by replacing a CEO is the PR (Todd mostly generate negative headlines). Like most governance organisations, the head is merely a puppet.

I think most people agree somewhat, BUT Todd makes it hard for himself, Whenever he does make a captain's call (Smitty's wife's ring, Inglis' reference) it's always something that reeks of impartiality. Or worse, suckery.

 

[larry2005]

TBH I don’t think much will change if Todd Greenburg is removed. The only thing that can change by replacing a CEO is the PR (Todd mostly generate negative headlines).

I agree with this quite a lot. Not so much about the puppet part, but I just really don't think all too much changes because the CEO changes - same as the country doesn't suddenly about-turn because the Prime Minister changes.

Todd Greenberg is a really easy target - his background (Bulldogs), his politician-type speaking (lacks authenticity), frankly he has a fairly punchable head. Fans like to dislike Greenberg, it's almost become a cliche.

In contrast, David Gallop was moderately popular. But did Gallop hit home runs every year? Certainly not. I don't think he performed any better than Greenberg has, and certainly no fewer controversies, salary cap or reffing issues.

But you know who presided over the biggest TV rights deal in all of NRL history? Dave Smith. A Welsh banking rugby enthusiast who couldn't tell Ben Barba from Benji Marshall. Smith wasn't even prominent enough to be disliked - fans barely knew anything about him and he flew under the radar for most of his 3-year tenure.

I think the commentary around TG's role as CEO in this thread shows a general lack of understanding of how corporate boards work. It is the CEO's role to come up with a strategic, business and operating plan that is endorsed by the board. The board can have input but once these plans are put by the CEO and accepted by the board, the CEO basically accepts responsibility for the execution of these plans.

It is the Chairman's responsibility to ensure the CEO is not a beholden to powerful members on the board and that his actions are consistent with the plans approved by the board. His performance is measured by how well the plans are executed.

There are two possible areas where TG could be in trouble. The first is that PVL doesn't agree with the strategy and/or the generally poor execution of the plans.

My view from afar is TG would be in trouble on both accounts.

Apart from sorting out the CEO, PVL must rid the board of vested interests that may be hampering the CEO in performing his role (growing the game basically).

There should be fun times ahead because you don't appoint PVL if you want the status quo. TG is gone.

 

[Tiger_Steve]

⚠️ GREENBERG'S FUTURE UP IN THE AIR? ⚠️

It has been reported that Todd Greenberg's leadership as NRL Chief Executive is under scrutiny, with his future to be decided as early as next week.

There are suggestions of 'friction' between Todd Greenberg and Peter V'landys, with several club bosses also unhappy with Greenberg's leadership.

The underlying issue between Greenberg and V'landys seems to be their opposite views on fixtures at suburban grounds.

V'landys is all for taking televised games away from large stadiums, to avoid excessive empty seats.

Greenberg on the other hand, who has strong relationships with those connected to these larger venues, is pushing for games to remain put.

Another area of concern relates to the NRL's no-fault stand-down policy. The policy has again been in the spotlight after the NRL decided not to stand-down Curtis Scott this week, with fans angry over 'inconsistencies' with the policy.

However, the announcement of a 30-million-dollar surplus, the second surplus in as many years, will definitely help Greenberg's case for reinstatement.

When appointed as Chief Executive on 18th March 2018, Greenberg stated:

"My goal will be to unite the game at every level,because working together, there is no limit to the potential for Rugby League, which can continue to thrive and grow."

From Rugby League Couch Coaches via Facebook

 

[Tiger_Steve]

Yes - no sources named
Yes - it was on Facebook
Yes - it has no credibility

Just let me dream For a bit...

 

[Elderslie_Tiger]

Reports saying TODDY held a birthday party for his wife a lot of dignitaries there including the Premier but no PVL more fuel to the fire

 

[Tiger_Steve]

Reports saying TODDY held a birthday party for his wife a lot of dignitaries there including the Premier but no PVL more fuel to the fire

Cam Smith? Greg Inglis?

 

[Elderslie_Tiger]

Paul Kent drops NRL CEO bombshell: ‘The odds are in favour of Todd being moved on’
Todd Greenberg’s future will be decided by a subcommittee. AAPimage/David Clark
Todd Greenberg’s future will be decided by a subcommittee. AAPimage/David Clark
An ARL Commission subcommittee has been established to decide the future of Todd Greenberg, and early reports don’t bode well for the NRL chief executive.

That’s according to NRL 360 host Paul Kent who revealed on Monday that Greenberg faces a battle to extend his time in the top job.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

I'm not optimistic that we'll do much better.

 

[Tigerboy]

Paul Kent drops NRL CEO bombshell: ‘The odds are in favour of Todd being moved on’
Todd Greenberg’s future will be decided by a subcommittee. AAPimage/David Clark
Todd Greenberg’s future will be decided by a subcommittee. AAPimage/David Clark
An ARL Commission subcommittee has been established to decide the future of Todd Greenberg, and early reports don’t bode well for the NRL chief executive.

That’s according to NRL 360 host Paul Kent who revealed on Monday that Greenberg faces a battle to extend his time in the top job.

One hundred percent Kenty!!!! Go you good things, a commissioned subcommittee 👋

 

[hobbo1]

I'm not optimistic that we'll do much better.

That’s the sad truth ....but punting toddles is at least a start !

 

[jirskyr]

Paul Kent drops NRL CEO bombshell: ‘

How is this a bombshell? God Foxsports stink.

 

[Russell]

Paul Kent drops NRL CEO bombshell: ‘

How is this a bombshell? God Foxsports stink.

Because any glimmer of hope .....

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

who do we get David Trodden

 

[Tiger_Steve]

Paul Kent drops NRL CEO bombshell: ‘

How is this a bombshell? God Foxsports stink.

It’s so disappointing isn’t it. I love the footy, as we all do, so I enjoy immersing myself in the game. I watch all the shows if I can. But the standard is cringeworthy. The concept of raising the profile of journalists is a good one but unfortunately the journalists themselves are just pathetic. Sadly though, they are just doing what their employer demands of them.

 

[twentyforty]

Paul Kent drops NRL CEO bombshell: ‘The odds are in favour of Todd being moved on’
Todd Greenberg’s future will be decided by a subcommittee. AAPimage/David Clark
Todd Greenberg’s future will be decided by a subcommittee. AAPimage/David Clark
An ARL Commission subcommittee has been established to decide the future of Todd Greenberg, and early reports don’t bode well for the NRL chief executive.

That’s according to NRL 360 host Paul Kent who revealed on Monday that Greenberg faces a battle to extend his time in the top job.

One hundred percent Kenty!!!! Go you good things, a commissioned subcommittee ?

Kenty was really wound up about it yesterday on 360. So to , Hoops and Buzz, but not like Kenty.
The committee has a “show reasons why you should stay” type of interview with Todd, but apparently won’t have a decision until 19/3.

 

[Elderslie_Tiger]

who do we get David Trodden

Laurie Daly on the Big Sports Breakfast was ask who he thought could be line for the position and he gave David Trodden and big wrap for the work he's being doing with the NSWRL and said he would not be out of his depth if the position came his way