TheDaBoss
Well-known member
150k and we have a deal dogs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tigerwest said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1380237) said:@mighty_tiger said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1380178) said:400k a year isn’t terrible for DWZ.
Not many would take a pay cut of 4-500k for a year
Given his age I would stay for a year earn 880k and get the 3-400k for the next 2-3yrs after as he will get that easily after next season anyway with expansion on the cards.
Also giving the Bulldogs 800k to play with next year or even half that would be massive boost for them.
Wont the dogs have to pay the balance of his contract after anything we give him?
@thedaboss said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383325) said:150k and we have a deal dogs
@tiger_one said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383333) said:Transfer Rules:
Rule # 1: Never buy Bulldogs rejects.
Rule # 2: If you forget the rule, or think something is tempting, refer to Rule # 1.
@leichardt99 said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383335) said:@tiger_one said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383333) said:Transfer Rules:
Rule # 1: Never buy Bulldogs rejects.
Rule # 2: If you forget the rule, or think something is tempting, refer to Rule # 1.
DWZ is Isaako with better hands, sub par fullback but decent winger. You wouldn't want him because he's from the dogs but I'd rather jag DWZ for 300k than Isaako from the just as bad broncs who would likely cost more.
@twentyforty said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383346) said:I would prefer Isaako @ $400 than Dal @ $300, but would be happier with both.
@tigerbenji said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383347) said:I thought the Dogs only want to pay $300K for this year & next & leaving us to foot the rest which is about $550,000 per year.
@tiger_one said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383333) said:Transfer Rules:
Rule # 1: Never buy Bulldogs rejects.
Rule # 2: If you forget the rule, or think something is tempting, refer to Rule # 1.
@jrtiger said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383348) said:@twentyforty said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383346) said:I would prefer Isaako @ $400 than Dal @ $300, but would be happier with both.
I don't think there's room for both with the deal Nofo's on. we can only have one. Isaako for me personally, but DWZ still has plenty left to offer at 25.
@crazycat said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383315) said:Hey Lessons learned from Mbye:
Dont sign dogs Rejects.
But Mbye did go good. Honestly starting to think keep him at 5/8…I hate thinking that, but cant deny he is going well there.
Dont keep them on silly Salary:
So DWZ is at 850k. Dogs offload him at 850k, next year he becomes an 850k headache.
Mbye, if he was say 400k. I hate saying this, we would probably keep him.
DWZ is not the player we need. We need someone who will up our defense or up our team structure. DWZ does neither.
Honestly Shawn Johnson would be better and we send Jackson Hastings to the Dogs!
But if we did take him, can someone make it clear that they are then on 300k? Or is there a reason why that cannot work?
@tiger_fanatic3 said in [Transfer Market: Tigers’ shock bid to snare DWZ](/post/1383417) said:“Bulldogs are willing to pay close to half, with the Wests Tigers considering paying the other half of (DWZ’s) salary next year, as well as part of his salary this year.
It averages out to be around $300,000 per year for the next two seasons if it goes through.”