Tuilagi NO TRY..

There’s been a plethora of tries awarded over the years due to no separation so if the bunker was being consistent then it should have been awarded. Even if he was deemed to be tackled in the air and just dropped the ball it should have been a penalty try.

The bunker has screwed us over continually this season and cost us at least two games. It’s equal parts farcical and disgusting. The NRL won’t do anything about it though because they’re useless.
 
I swore he grounded it even taking my tigers goggles off where my mate (doggies supporter) I was watching with said no way they got it right.

A weird one. Decision where both sides are confident with their opinions. Different game if it was awarded.
 
TigerJunior4 said:
There’s been a plethora of tries awarded over the years due to no separation so if the bunker was being consistent then it should have been awarded. Even if he was deemed to be tackled in the air and just dropped the ball it should have been a penalty try.

The bunker has screwed us over continually this season and cost us at least two games. It’s equal parts farcical and disgusting. The NRL won’t do anything about it though because they’re useless.
Click to expand...

The other possibilities are even worse to contemplate,a more than slight tinge of bias or corruption
 
jadtiger said:
The other possibilities are even worse to contemplate,a more than slight tinge of bias or corruption
Click to expand...
Conspiracy has always been real in RL.

The rorts and injustices to the Magpies 70s and 80s were unbelievable and mostly in the 80s not televised.

I thought when Fox controlled things between 2000 and 2009 things were less biased than ever.

But now where back to the rorts.

Can anyone imagine Easts or Melbourne overturning 3 challenges and what the post match interviews would be about.

NRL360 would be talking about how the system has to change all week.

It can be said we have been dudded 3 games this year.
 
First time tv not show a slow motion of hand ball all the way to ground
Perhaps might have embarrassed bunker .It went up try so would have needed conclusive proof of hand ball separation ,But I can't tell because replays inadequate .Also if bunker determines that a try would almost certainly be scored except for breach it Is a Penalty Try
Annessly explain?
 
jadtiger said:
The other possibilities are even worse to contemplate,a more than slight tinge of bias or corruption
Click to expand...
I didn’t want to go there but at face value this reeks of bias. The fact that we’ve had so many bunker calls go against us is pretty alarming and there’s also been no apparent improvement in process.

There was criticism the Leilua no try against the Warriors wasn’t looked at. Same with the Nofo in goal call against Parra. Now we have the bunker give it one quick look make a ruling of no try and not even consider penalty try.

It’s so inconsistent with the process employed with other teams. The bunker will look at all available angles, replay it at least a few times before coming up with a decision.
 
TigerJunior4 said:
I didn’t want to go there but at face value this reeks of bias. The fact that we’ve had so many bunker calls go against us is pretty alarming and there’s also been no apparent improvement in process.

There was criticism the Leilua no try against the Warriors wasn’t looked at. Same with the Nofo in goal call against Parra. Now we have the bunker give it one quick look make a ruling of no try and not even consider penalty try.

It’s so inconsistent with the process employed with other teams. The bunker will look at all available angles, replay it at least a few times before coming up with a decision.
Click to expand...
I was leaning towards incompetence but nah it's corruption
 
TieDye said:
I did mate, very accurate and you could almost send that through to HQ, signed, all Angry WT supporters… who happen to bring in the most fan engagement and top quality revenue to the game (supposedly?).. we’ll get looked after 🔜
Click to expand...
haha yeah man! I've tagged NRL Bunker on it...Tigers fans need to retweet and tag in the NRL too!
 
NZTiger said:
Ridiculous that they dismissed it so fast and didnt slow it down frame by frame like they did with Tom Burgess' try so...HERE'S HOW IT SHOULD'VE PLAYED OUT!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1520976346427817986
Click to expand...
Thanks for posting this. During the game I was baffled why they didn't show the slow motion replay like they always do with tries like this. Live it looks like he bounced it but they way they judge it now I agree it should have been a try.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

... and 48 more.
Total: 643 (members: 98, guests: 545)
Back
Top