Very silly argument.
First of all Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is a liar, that's a fact. A cheat, liar, bankrupt, adulterer, rapist. All facts, all proven in public. Nothing conjecture about that. Therefore anything he says must be taken within the context of being a liar and a felon.
Secondly, it appears you are arguing to not make any projections or conjections or guesses or estimates about the performance of a future candidate, which is illogical because many candidates have never been US President before. If you attempt to bind Harris to the performance of Biden administration, you have to similarly bring in the history of Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon also, his bankrupt businesses, his historical crimes etc. etc.
The worst part about all you've said is, possibly more than any President in history, it is most accurate to conflate Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon the person with Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon the administration. They are increasingly intertwined. He owns the Republican Party, without any form of contest, to the point it's really the MAGA party now and not entirely related to his GOP predecessors. Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is nothing like Bush or Reagan or Cheney, nor is his party, to the point now where former staunch Republicans endorse a Democratic candidate.
You must judge Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon on the things he says and his personality. The US Presidential election is a popularity contest as much as anything, more so than becoming Prime Minister of Australia. They directly elect their President.
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon botched COVID. He denied his election loss, incited a riot. My brain explodes how anyone can excuse that and try to desperately find any cracks of argument that can overcome his dark and dangerous history. The first time around I can understand, Americans taking a punt on a somewhat unknown entity, but they've seen the Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon administration once before and it was dark and dangerous. He turned on his former associates and allies, found new ones. There is no credit to trying to downplay him or pretend the man and the job are not entwined. There is no justification for it.
Mainly because most of it's subjective, long-bow drawing, biased rhetoric. It's catastrophising, hyperbolic, inaccurate, coercive nonsense.
It's also the one-sided analysis for me. Have the Dem noms never lied? Did Dem senators not call for 'no justice, no peace' during the BLM riots?
Do direct quotes matter anymore?
'I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. '
That was the DIRECT quote re; Jan 6th. This has been done to death. That is objectively, irrefutably and importantly, a call for peaceful protest and the right to assemble.
To say anything else is a perception and, generally, one grounded in bias.
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is not Hitler.
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is not a fascist.
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is not a 'threat to democracy'.
These are all Dem-promoted falsehoods. You critiquing those, too?
I do not like the way Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon goes about his business, nor do I think he represents a model citizen or bastion for democracy in The West, but he speaks to an everyman that is tired of being censored, manipulated and demonised for their varied views, are tired of having propaganda shoved down their throat in the name of diversity and equity and, generally, would like to be left alone to live their lives in a country that prioritises their own countrymen.
Like it or not, a great proportion of US citizens are tired of the Democrats' weak immigration policies, their attacks on masculinity and the general feeling of everything being shit in their country.
They have a right to vote for a candidate that they feel will have their best interests at heart and not be called 'garbage' for daring to disagree with who they're being told they SHOULD vote for.