We wil blow it

so i have to say my team will win every single week to have passion?

try looking at it unbias for once. actually being upset and angry about the team losing shows passiion . after a loss and brushing it off and saying ohh well next week we will win. to me is someone who doesn't wear their teams heart on their sleeves and couldn't care less.
 
@Golden said:
Is that suppose to be funny?

**Guess you have no pashion for the team if you feel nothing after 89** everyone sseems to love the raiders and have them as their 2nd team and hate Manly WHY??? Manly have done nothing to my team in a grand final.

That was Balmain that got done by Canberra, Golden. There are many ex Wests supporters on here - why would we feel anything after 89? In any case, it has nothing to do with WT. FTR, I don't really have anything against Manly either - also has nothing to do with WT and it's ancient history.
 
@Golden said:
Is that suppose to be funny?

Guess you have no pashion for the team if you feel nothing after 89 everyone sseems to love the raiders and have them as their 2nd team and hate Manly WHY??? Manly have done nothing to my team in a grand final.

Ink is in old Magpie, why would he care about what happened in 89? You hate the raiders and thats your business, we all have our own teams who we hate, but you could do a much better job at expressing yourself in a much more adult, mature way then you do atm cos whenever you mention the ''faiders'' you come across as a whiney 8 yr old having a sook for not getting any lollies
 
@tiger4ever said:
golden im lost where your going with this mate…have some faith for a change..

A pathetic attempt at reverse physcology one would think. If it isn't then he truely is a sad individual
 
As an old Maggie myself I can admit to cheering on Canberra in that GF … Sorry. Was a great game but.

Anyway back to the roosters game today ... I can hardly watch ... Sick of getting rolled by these glitzy tossers.

We just have to find a way to nab a win ... Doesn't matter how ...
 
todays game will prove one thing for wests-tigers for season 2012:

whether they are contenders or pretenders.

no reason to sugar coat it.
 
@westTAHger said:
todays game will prove one thing for wests-tigers for season 2012:

whether they are contenders or pretenders.

no reason to sugar coat it.

You said the same thing about the Parra game.

But not the Dogs game.

…and again this game, pretenders or contenders.

Does it depend on who we play?
 
I remember when I was just a small Laotian boy and took up my glass blowing apprenticeship.

They were halcyion days indeed
 
@innsaneink said:
@westTAHger said:
todays game will prove one thing for wests-tigers for season 2012:

whether they are contenders or pretenders.

no reason to sugar coat it.

You said the same thing about the Parra game.

But not the Dogs game.

…and again this game, pretenders or contenders.

Does it depend on who we play?

No.
**am in a no bull .s , don't pee me off, or I will stalk you, state/ frame of mind**. :smiling_imp:
even the people who have a mainly positive outlook get fed up, with a team which has many internationals in it and does not perform consistently to their capability. :unamused:
 
It looks as though we are gonna have to win both of our last 2 games to get in, before Friday night was thinking we only needed to win 1 of our next 2 games but because the Raiders won it's a different ball game now.
Watching the Warriors vs Dragons can't even see them beating the Raiders next week in NZ, and youd think Broncos will beat the Panthers at Suncorp. So to guarentee need to win both games. Lose today we are pretty much gone..
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Golden said:
Is that suppose to be funny?

Guess you have no pashion for the team if you feel nothing after 89 everyone sseems to love the raiders and have them as their 2nd team and hate Manly WHY??? Manly have done nothing to my team in a grand final.

Ink is in old Magpie, why would he care about what happened in 89? You hate the raiders and thats your business, we all have our own teams who we hate, but you could do a much better job at expressing yourself in a much more adult, mature way then you do atm cos whenever you mention the ''faiders'' you come across as a whiney 8 yr old having a sook for not getting any lollies

would you rather I call them the Beautiful raiders?? if this forum wasn't so censored Id call them other things note why I say 'stupid' if the forum has us having to be treated like kids and can't swear then I have to use kids words
 
@westTAHger said:
No.
**am in a no bull .s , don't pee me off, or I will stalk you, state/ frame of mind**. :smiling_imp:
even the people who have a mainly positive outlook get fed up, with a team which has many internationals in it and does not perform consistently to their capability. :unamused:

What the hell????

I'm flattered, but Im sure you'd have more fun stalking a good sort of the female variety
I'm just a simple garbo….no excitement stalking me
 
@innsaneink said:
@westTAHger said:
No.
**am in a no bull .s , don't pee me off, or I will stalk you, state/ frame of mind**.
even the people who have a mainly positive outlook get fed up, with a team which has many internationals in it and does not perform consistently to their capability.

What the hell????

I'm flattered, but Im sure you'd have more fun stalking a good sort of the female variety
I'm just a simple garbo….no excitement stalking me

He heard Humphrey doesnt wear pants
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@Golden said:
Yep mr negative says we will blow this game, why>??? no Farah and always lose to the roosters always lose to crap teams when we need to beat them the team only steps up against top teams.

and watch those stupid idiot faiders a team I hate fluke it somehow on Friday, just to make me want to off myself didn't they make the 8 in 07 instead of us too which was a joke? or am I thinking another year

See, see, I told you. Im right again

or

Gee Im glad I was wrong…we got lucky.

Just cut n paste whatevers applicable at about 3.45pm
 
and once again I am correct and your stuck with me here

do you guys now see why I am so negative ?>??? do you not get it yet=???
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top