851
Well-known member
Sound good,but what happens if Balmain can't pay their debt off in time and lose their 50% share in the JV as outlined in the report,who takes that 50%?,and do Wests get a say in it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Guest said:@turnstyle said:Wests Tigers take first steps to climbing back from brink of extinction
Josh Massoud The Daily Telegraph January 30, 2014 11:30PM
UNPAID rent, food suppliers, security firms and star players complaining about their marquee bonuses being lost in the mail.
There was even a morning when the coaching staff was told there would be no new footballs for training until the previous ones were paid for.
Welcome to life at Wests Tigers over the past 18 months.
Ominous clouds have been rapidly gathering since the joint venture posted a staggering and unexpected loss in excess of $2 million at the end of 2012.
Fresh from back-to-back finals appearances, the Tigers started that season as premiership favourites and budgeted accordingly. Instead they finished out of the top eight and deep in the red, as sponsorship, attendance and merchandise numbers fell alarmingly short of expectation.
The seven-figure shortfall was comfortably the biggest in the joint venture's 14-year existence, most of which had been eeked out with an impressive degree of financial prudence within the rusted confines of Concord Oval.
\
\
\
But suddenly decisions went haywire. Coach Tim Sheens was sacked with two years remaining on his contract, and continued to receive a full salary for nine months after his dismissal. Top players like Andrew Fifita, Bryce Gibbs and Chris Heighington were given early releases, with the Tigers paying part of their wages at Cronulla just to comply with the salary cap.
They were excesses and miscalculations that simply that simply could not be afforded. Worse still, they quickly pushed the Tigers to the brink of extinction because the Balmain half was unable to meet its financial obligations.
Under the original JV constitution, signed in 1999, shareholders Wests Group and Balmain were required to provide equal funding each season to balance the NRL club's books.
With their Rozelle Leagues Club reduced to rubble and red tape, Balmain could offer little or no aid, which virtually reduced the financial obligation on Wests to zero.
Balmain's suffrage put Wests in a position of power, because four of the five Magpies-aligned directors were appointed from the successful Leagues Club in Ashfield and had access to riches that could keep the Tigers afloat.
Magpies diehards wanted the club to flex its financial plight and effectively buy control, condemning their Balmain bedfellows to irrelevance.
But the reality of being primarily responsible for the huge losses that are commonly associated with NRL club did not sit comfortably with the Ashfield directors, whose No. 1 responsibility is to safeguard the interests of their Leagues Club members.
To ensure vital costs such as wages were met, Ashfield made several loans to the joint venture. But a more permanent fix was required to ensure the mounting debts did not turn lethal.
As the mammoth loss of 2012 began to materialise, Tigers powerbrokers began to talk about radical reform measures that would see the joint venture give way to a single entity run by directors with no alignment to either foundation club. In this utopia, there would be no Balmain or Wests. Only Wests Tigers.
Last night's announcement that three independent directors, nominated by the NRL, would hold the balance of power on a new seven-man board is a huge step toward that goal.
Since NRL boss Dave Smith accepted a call to help Wests and Balmain reach middle ground last July, negotiations have pushed through old hatreds and entrenched agendas to carve-out the most historic accord in the joint venture's history.
Will only succeed when all supporters start looking at the club as Wests Tigers and not Balmain or Magpies. Stop selling Magpie gear and Balmain gear at grounds.
Until this happens all this work will be for nothing
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
@Newtown said:After 14 years why can't we believe that we are the West Tigers not Balmain or Western Suburbs? I hope that yesterday's heroes like Ben Elias keep completely out of the new running of this modern club.
@tigerbalm said:Will two years make any difference to Balmain's cash crisis? Seems like it's just putting off the inevitable.
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
@smeghead said:Congratulations to Mayer and Smith for their work in this regard.
It appears blood can be drawn from a stone after all.
@Benjirific said:@smeghead said:Congratulations to Mayer and Smith for their work in this regard.
It appears blood can be drawn from a stone after all.
Not sure how much Mayer had to do with this. I'd say credit has to go to Smith, and Cook and Di Girolimo who seem to have sorted this out like adults, rather than the children who have previously inhabited the board.
@Black'n'White said:Lets hope for a brighter future…
Though i dont know why, but my gut is telling me that this is all going to go pear-shaped somehow. I really hope that I am totally and utterly wrong, honest to god.
Im old Magpies, now Wests Tigers, and am glad that the boardroom deadlock has been broken, but get the feeling that Balmain has called for a lifeline and has been handed a length of rope...