innsaneink
Well-known member
50/50….its never worked, good riddance...
\
\

\
\

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@happy tiger said:I'm not trying to start a fight but I have a question
**What is going to stop the Balmain and Wests factions still bringing their agendas to the table and getting the independent to vote one way or the other**
I imagine the independents will still be following the agenda the NRL wants (no matter how independent they will claim to be )
@happy tiger said:I'm not trying to start a fight but I have a question
What is going to stop the Balmain and Wests factions still bringing their agendas to the table and getting the independent to vote one way or the
Absolutely nothing Happy … And that's the beauty of this arrangement. There's nothing wrong with any director pushing any agenda. But he has has to convince someone that is not aligned to go along with it. This gets rid of the old what's best for the Magpies or Balmain mentality. The focus is now completely on Wests Tigers. It doesn't mean the foundation clubs are out of it and no longer represented. The four foundation directors only have to join together to keep the history in the club .... Which is another plus ..... We may see the Balmain and Magpies directors joining forces more often if the Independants throw up something they don't like.
@Knuckles said:@happy tiger said:I'm not trying to start a fight but I have a question
What is going to stop the Balmain and Wests factions still bringing their agendas to the table and getting the independent to vote one way or the
Absolutely nothing Happy … And that's the beauty of this arrangement. There's nothing wrong with any director pushing any agenda. But he has has to convince someone that is not aligned to go along with it. This gets rid of the old what's best for the Magpies or Balmain mentality. The focus is now completely on Wests Tigers. It doesn't mean the foundation clubs are out of it and no longer represented. The four foundation directors only have to join together to keep the history in the club .... Which is another plus ..... We may see the Balmain and Magpies directors joining forces more often if the Independants throw up something they don't like.
@turnstyle said:@Black'n'White said:Lets hope for a brighter future…
Though i dont know why, but my gut is telling me that this is all going to go pear-shaped somehow. I really hope that I am totally and utterly wrong, honest to god.
Im old Magpies, now Wests Tigers, and am glad that the boardroom deadlock has been broken, but get the feeling that Balmain has called for a lifeline and has been handed a length of rope...
i understand exactly what youre saying: there is what could be seen as a very faint, ghostlike image in the tigers boardroom that could very well develop into a full blown white elephant named the balmain debt.
if it is not paid within the 2 years (and i also hope it is) then it could be goodbye to any say in the club for the balmain half.
having said that, i just hope that whatever the case may be after that period that the club retains its Wests Tigers identity. i think they would lose a lot of fans, possibly me (oh no!), if they **reverted to a pure wests magpies** entity.
@happy tiger said:@Knuckles said:@happy tiger said:I'm not trying to start a fight but I have a question
What is going to stop the Balmain and Wests factions still bringing their agendas to the table and getting the independent to vote one way or the
Absolutely nothing Happy … And that's the beauty of this arrangement. There's nothing wrong with any director pushing any agenda. But he has has to convince someone that is not aligned to go along with it. This gets rid of the old what's best for the Magpies or Balmain mentality. The focus is now completely on Wests Tigers. It doesn't mean the foundation clubs are out of it and no longer represented. The four foundation directors only have to join together to keep the history in the club .... Which is another plus ..... We may see the Balmain and Magpies directors joining forces more often if the Independants throw up something they don't like.
That's my point though ,this still will be voting on agendas which will still be biased to either Balmain or Wests
They need to be focusing solely on the Wests Tigers
We need to get a completely separate board altogether
This is a step in the right direction ,don't get me wrong but we need to completely rid ourselves of JV mentality completely
@851 said:Sound good,but what happens if Balmain can't pay their debt off in time and lose their 50% share in the JV as outlined in the report,who takes that 50%?,and do Wests get a say in it?