Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14..

@Jedi_Tiger said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205393) said:
id say Blore has been told to pull his head in and knuckle down and dont read press just get back to basics
as far as tomorrow goes we may just beat dogs but not confident seyfarth is rubbish

Blore hadn’t been Mitch better lately.

Madge really doesn’t have much to work with ET McQueen much better?
 
@Geo said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205417) said:
There are only 2 blokes who could have played Blore or Taylor who are not...given the injuries,,

We know what Taylor brings ..Blore is a rookie and in plans obviously..Seyfarth is getting no footy off contract ..it's an opportunity to see if he's worthy of getting a contract

I can tell you know we should not offer a contract
 
Yeah let's write off a 21 year old middle forward who has played 3 first grade games as a career plodder. That's very intelligent.
 
@facepalmer said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205422) said:
Yeah let's write off a 21 year old middle forward who has played 3 first grade games as a career plodder. That's very intelligent.

I don’t like to use the plodder too often because it gets used a fair bit in this forum but he is a plodder.


We haven’t made the finals in 11 years I think it’s time to think bigger.
 
That’s a workhorse type of bench - little impact. Not sure how we will roll forward once Josh and Rusty have a breather.
 
@facepalmer said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205437) said:
The list of players who weren't superstars in their first 3 games and went on to play for Australia is quite a list.

Cooper Cronk. He didn't even have a position when he came into first grade. Started his career filling anywhere on the park. He was a manufactured half.
 
@tony-soprano said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205420) said:
@Geo said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205417) said:
There are only 2 blokes who could have played Blore or Taylor who are not...given the injuries,,

We know what Taylor brings ..Blore is a rookie and in plans obviously..Seyfarth is getting no footy off contract ..it's an opportunity to see if he's worthy of getting a contract

I can tell you know we should not offer a contract

That may be or could be another Nathan Brown who was let go played for Souffs let go again now everyone wants him back..

The point is with no footy outside of NRL this year you wouldn’t know
 
Can someone explain the bench?

We have THREE back rowers on the bench...and yet all our starting back rowers play long mins.

We have NO props on the bench...and yet both our props will come off after 20-25 mins.

I do not get the logic at all.
 
@ElleryHanley said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205534) said:
Can someone explain the bench?

We have THREE back rowers on the bench...and yet all our starting back rowers play long mins.

We have NO props on the bench...and yet both our props will come off after 20-25 mins.

I do not get the logic at all.

I mean both Seyfarth and McIntyre have played up the middle for us this year. McIntyre in particular has been solid at prop. Would’ve preferred Blore to Seyfarth though.
 
@JoshColeman99 said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205535) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205534) said:
Can someone explain the bench?

We have THREE back rowers on the bench...and yet all our starting back rowers play long mins.

We have NO props on the bench...and yet both our props will come off after 20-25 mins.

I do not get the logic at all.

I mean both Seyfarth and McIntyre have played up the middle for us this year. McIntyre in particular has been solid at prop. Would’ve preferred Blore to Seyfarth though.


Seyfarth is a 13 imo.

Sam is an 11. Zero need for Lawrence.

Blore should be there for size and power.
 
@ElleryHanley said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205545) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205535) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205534) said:
Can someone explain the bench?

We have THREE back rowers on the bench...and yet all our starting back rowers play long mins.

We have NO props on the bench...and yet both our props will come off after 20-25 mins.

I do not get the logic at all.

I mean both Seyfarth and McIntyre have played up the middle for us this year. McIntyre in particular has been solid at prop. Would’ve preferred Blore to Seyfarth though.


Seyfarth is a 13 imo.

Sam is an 11. Zero need for Lawrence.

Blore should be there for size and power.

Eiso can play both. In our team the lock normally just plays as another prop. McIntyre hasn’t really played on an edge for us all year

Definitely think Blore should’ve been there. If we win all will be forgotten ? guess we will have to wait and see
 
I feel like Blore must not be there for that instagram post - maybe Madge showing there's more than on-field performances to being a first grader.

Because its bizarre otherwise.
 
@ElleryHanley said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205534) said:
Can someone explain the bench?

We have THREE back rowers on the bench...and yet all our starting back rowers play long mins.

We have NO props on the bench...and yet both our props will come off after 20-25 mins.

I do not get the logic at all.

The only other player fit in our squad at the moment that is considered a Prop is Clark..

We have no Props with Musgrove, Twal, Mikeale injured..

You said yourself Seyfath and McIntyre are back rowers as is Blore..

So I guess you would have to ask whether Clark offers more at Prop..
 
@Geo said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205556) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205534) said:
Can someone explain the bench?

We have THREE back rowers on the bench...and yet all our starting back rowers play long mins.

We have NO props on the bench...and yet both our props will come off after 20-25 mins.

I do not get the logic at all.

The only other player fit in our squad at the moment that is considered a Prop is Clark..

We have no Props with Musgrove, Twal, Mikeale injured..

You said yourself Seyfath and McIntyre are back rowers as is Blore..

So I guess you would have to ask whether Clark offers more at Prop..


I do think Blore can play some prop easily enough though.

I just don't get Sam 'and' Lawrence on the bench.

Having said that....Dogs bench is still worse 🙂
 
After sleeping on it, the only thing I can think of is we should beat the dogs with this team and we have an eye on the vulnerable chooks next week. That’s a game we need to win if we are to get to the 8.

It will be a moment of truth this afternoon
 
@Moh said in [Wests Tigers Team v Canterbury Rd 14\.\.](/post/1205555) said:
I feel like Blore must not be there for that instagram post - maybe Madge showing there's more than on-field performances to being a first grader.

Because its bizarre otherwise.

Instagram post?
 
Can't see us winning with the bench we have named. Still, stranger things have happened.
 
Back
Top