What about the penalty count???

I think most people can see the penalties against us were mostly ok but what is annoying is that camerons cheats do the same each week and dont get penalised for it.
The refereeing was very one sided on saturday, ref smith and his associates saw to that
 
@ said:
I think most people can see the penalties against us were mostly ok but what is annoying is that camerons cheats do the same each week and dont get penalised for it.
The refereeing was very one sided on saturday, ref smith and his associates saw to that

We have to make it an issue. When Cam comes up here the Storm will be a well toned outfit and ready to take vengeance on us. We have to push on the Refs to ref it fair. No more Melbourne Shonkies.
 
@ said:
@ said:
I think most people can see the penalties against us were mostly ok but what is annoying is that camerons cheats do the same each week and dont get penalised for it.
The refereeing was very one sided on saturday, ref smith and his associates saw to that

We have to make it an issue. When Cam comes up here the Storm will be a well toned outfit and ready to take vengeance on us. We have to push on the Refs to ref it fair. No more Melbourne Shonkies.

You will have to Fly over to NZ to be heard for the second coming with Cammy…
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Let’s not forget the dozen looks they had at Brooks try, looking for a reason not to give it.

On that what were they acually looking for..you don't get bunker audio at mthe game and we couldn't work it out with all the rocking and rollling

Was it some sort of obstrution lost ball what…?

They had about six thousand views of him taking the pass. They must have been thinking (or hoping) he lost it into the defender.

They were looking at every reason not to give that. I nearly fell off my chair when they said Lawrence was OK for running at Slater.

Of some interest, they were going to award a penalty to us if the try was disallowed so presumably Marsters would have got the chance to level things up.
 
It looked like they got lost in the bunker…. FFing and Rewinding nonsensically... Just lost.
Don't think they were looking for any reasons to deny
 
@ said:
It looked like they got lost in the bunker…. FFing and Rewinding nonsensically... Just lost.
Don't think they were looking for any reasons to deny

I agree. It looked like they couldn't find where they were on the sequence.
 
That sin binning was ridiculous. Matulino didn't do anything wrong. Just the rich clubs getting the calls from refs once again.
 
@ said:
That sin binning was ridiculous. Matulino didn't do anything wrong. Just the rich clubs getting the calls from refs once again.

I agree. Smith definitely took a dive. Matts was trying to get back his 10 and I think was almost there.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Munster is definitely an automatically edited!

It's a low bar on the swearing front round here! But fill in your own derogatory term as desired.

Just him playing with his hair and pointing to the right at marker after the tackle on Kevin soured my view on him. Was laughing at how pathetic he looked
 
@ said:
@ said:
It looked like they got lost in the bunker…. FFing and Rewinding nonsensically... Just lost.
Don't think they were looking for any reasons to deny

I agree. It looked like they couldn't find where they were on the sequence.

Yeah they dismissed the obstruction pretty quick and okayed Brooks getting possession just as quick and then requested grounding which took a while.
 
@ said:
That sin binning was ridiculous. Matulino didn't do anything wrong. Just the rich clubs getting the calls from refs once again.

Someone needs to make a GIF of Smyths shameful dive.
Typical cheating tactics from him playing outside the spirit of the game.
He needs to be shamed and highlited on google ala Ben Creaghs tutu
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
What about when Munster tripped/back slammed on of our players. I thought that would come under a dangerous tackle or a least not in the spirit of the game

That “trip” is part of wrestling take downs and was beautifully executed!
Nothing wrong with that at all it happens many times each games when players are holding themselves up and defensive players need that take down…
I was more concerned about the TWO times Cam Smith wasn’t square at marker and then made the tackle and wasn’t penalised.. but that’s the influence he has over refs I guess

Oldies know it as the Cumberland throw

I thought that the NRL outlawed the old Cumberland throw?
I don’t think that tackles like this are in the spirit of the game.
Could you imagine Cam blowing up it it happened to one of his players.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
What about when Munster tripped/back slammed on of our players. I thought that would come under a dangerous tackle or a least not in the spirit of the game

That “trip” is part of wrestling take downs and was beautifully executed!
Nothing wrong with that at all it happens many times each games when players are holding themselves up and defensive players need that take down…
I was more concerned about the TWO times Cam Smith wasn’t square at marker and then made the tackle and wasn’t penalised.. but that’s the influence he has over refs I guess

Oldies know it as the Cumberland throw

I thought that the NRL outlawed the old Cumberland throw?
I don’t think that tackles like this are in the spirit of the game.
Could you imagine Cam blowing up it it happened to one of his players.

We all would have known how he would have carried on had Kev happened to incur a serious injury.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
That “trip” is part of wrestling take downs and was beautifully executed!
Nothing wrong with that at all it happens many times each games when players are holding themselves up and defensive players need that take down…
I was more concerned about the TWO times Cam Smith wasn’t square at marker and then made the tackle and wasn’t penalised.. but that’s the influence he has over refs I guess

Oldies know it as the Cumberland throw

I thought that the NRL outlawed the old Cumberland throw?
I don’t think that tackles like this are in the spirit of the game.
Could you imagine Cam blowing up it it happened to one of his players.

We all would have known how he would have carried on had Kev happened to incur a serious injury.

For sure…..something like would not have happened if it wasn't for his hair..
 
On the "Cameron throw" . . . . 2 things.
1… Munster, with that smug, please hit me head of his . . . just stood there pretending to point defensive positioning to a fellow losing player. Didn't even have the decency to look down at Kev and offer any sort of concern.
2.... Look closely and you will see Smith instigate Kev's rotation with a sly nudge with the head.
All this after the held call. Typical cheating scum. Soul-less, passionless, identity-less cheating scum of the league. Manly, Souths and Parra all rate higher on my list of hated clubs.
Smith's swan dive at the feet of Mats should be shown to every budding referee so they can easily recognise simulation and not reward it with a sin bin.
So much sweeter a victory overcoming the putrid bias shown against us.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
What about when Munster tripped/back slammed on of our players. I thought that would come under a dangerous tackle or a least not in the spirit of the game

That “trip” is part of wrestling take downs and was beautifully executed!
Nothing wrong with that at all it happens many times each games when players are holding themselves up and defensive players need that take down…
I was more concerned about the TWO times Cam Smith wasn’t square at marker and then made the tackle and wasn’t penalised.. but that’s the influence he has over refs I guess

Oldies know it as the Cumberland throw

I thought that the NRL outlawed the old Cumberland throw?
I don’t think that tackles like this are in the spirit of the game.
Could you imagine Cam blowing up it it happened to one of his players.

The main issue was the ref called held before Munster decided to perform a back slam with half pike!!
 
Back
Top