happy_tiger
Well-known member
@goldcoast tiger said:
Got to disagree on this one
The attacking play from the back three of most sides because teams can't purposely kick the ball dead has been one of the refreshing highlights this season imo
What rules would you change
- Thread starter goldcoast_tiger
- Start date
Got to disagree on this one
The attacking play from the back three of most sides because teams can't purposely kick the ball dead has been one of the refreshing highlights this season imo
westTAHger
Well-known member
@happy tiger said:
I agree, golden point to be gone from the 26 rounds of the comp. 😛ray:
Have not liked it since it's inception. :smiling_imp:
happy_tiger
Well-known member
I'd like to see a rule where teams that defuse bombs in the field of play get a reward
Think it unfair when a player takes a bomb and then gets shoved into touch or the dead ball and the team gets penalized for it
Maybe if you defuse bombs in the ten metre zone you automatically get a twenty metre play the ball or you get 7 tackles from where the take is affected
Think it unfair when a player takes a bomb and then gets shoved into touch or the dead ball and the team gets penalized for it
Maybe if you defuse bombs in the ten metre zone you automatically get a twenty metre play the ball or you get 7 tackles from where the take is affected
foreveratiger
New member
@goldcoast tiger said:
Yeah this one and SCRUMS , i believe Refs should feed the scrum as they would be the only ones that would put the ball in the middle and allow Hookers to hook for it like the old days , what is the point these days when all halfbacks feed it to the 2nd rowers and Locks.
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
Wests tries would be made worth 8 points.
tsjonathan
New member
@GNR4LIFE said:
Still wouldn't be enough for us
InBenjiWeTrust
Well-known member
1 Captains challenge, 2 per half;
2 Extend 40-20 kicks to 30-30 and 20-40;
3 Scrum restart - no quick play the ball after 40-20 etc;
4 Warning before rewarding penalty for hand on the ball and hold down
2 Extend 40-20 kicks to 30-30 and 20-40;
3 Scrum restart - no quick play the ball after 40-20 etc;
4 Warning before rewarding penalty for hand on the ball and hold down
happy_tiger
Well-known member
@GNR4LIFE said:
What about Balmain's tries GNR ??
3 points perhaps
happy_tiger
Well-known member
@InBenjiWeTrust said:
Love the first 3 IBWT
foreveratiger
New member
@everett said:
Now where talking
@happy tiger said:
For God's sake don't start. Some dickhead will take you seriously and it'll go on for 10 pages.
Blackpearl
New member
Interchange reduced to 6 per game
No more golden point
Return to 5 metre rule to encourage skills aspect of the game.
That's my 3 cents worth
No more golden point
Return to 5 metre rule to encourage skills aspect of the game.
That's my 3 cents worth
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
There was a moment in the Panthers/Roosters game where Maloney stopped dead after he ran behind a teammate and surrendered. Idk if it was intentional or not, but the Panthers players just stood there and didn't tackle him and they got the penalty. And got me thinking, every time a player runs behind a teammate and surrenders, the defence tackles them and its play on cos the ball player didn't take the advantage. What should happen is the defence should refuse to tackle the ball player, cos the ball player can't take the advantage, and if the defence refuse to tackle him, what other choice does the ref have? He's not gonna penalize the defence for not making the tackle.
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
I'm afraid i don't
Nah… if it happened to us the player would stroll through and the men in pink would award a TRY...
