Who Would You Keep

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobarcats
  • Start date Start date
@tig_prmz said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493389) said:
I know we had an opportunity for this in 2016/17 but it sucks that our best players in Laurie, Stefano, Blore, AD ( I know he's our Junior but he didn't debut with us) and Luciano aren't WT through and through.

WT would always have 60-70% local Juniors in their squad. In a sense, to me anyway, that was a big part of WT identity.

Adam is definitely Tigers 'through and through' in spite of his brief stint at Souths (the opportunity he took because he wasn't part of the Tigers plans at the time) - If you have access via Fox/Kayo watch his extended interview (it's about 18 minutes) listed as an extra part of the 'Tigertown' series.

He genuinely seems a top bloke and wants his club (that he's loved since he was a kid) to succeed...


I'd still rather want Brooks and Noffa to do well instead of the above (provided they are still here). Simply because they are WT through and through.

I'd be happy for anyone to do well regardless of their background. At some point the club needs to be a bit more ruthless and say 'sorry you're not up to standard' even if they've come through all the way from juniors.
 
@pascoes_barber said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493561) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493389) said:
I know we had an opportunity for this in 2016/17 but it sucks that our best players in Laurie, Stefano, Blore, AD ( I know he's our Junior but he didn't debut with us) and Luciano aren't WT through and through.

WT would always have 60-70% local Juniors in their squad. In a sense, to me anyway, that was a big part of WT identity.

Adam is definitely Tigers 'through and through' in spite of his brief stint at Souths (the opportunity he took because he wasn't part of the Tigers plans at the time) - If you have access via Fox/Kayo watch his extended interview (it's about 18 minutes) listed as an extra part of the 'Tigertown' series.

He genuinely seems a top bloke and wants his club (that he's loved since he was a kid) to succeed...


I'd still rather want Brooks and Noffa to do well instead of the above (provided they are still here). Simply because they are WT through and through.

I'd be happy for anyone to do well regardless of their background. At some point the club needs to be a bit more ruthless and say 'sorry you're not up to standard' even if they've come through all the way from juniors.

It takes a while to build these connections and everyone makes connections to players in their own way.

I remember back in 2013 or so, an old poster here MacDougal made a thread about Brooks and Moses and this amazing combo they have had since high school. Unfortunately, I just dont have the same connection with AD as I do with Brooks of Noffa.. I remember people used to call him another Utai.

I'm sure AD is a great person and probably a better player than Brooks but it's gonna take years for me to develop the same connection with him.

Initial post I made though was mainly about more of a "what could have been"
 
@tig_prmz said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493748) said:
@pascoes_barber said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493561) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493389) said:
I know we had an opportunity for this in 2016/17 but it sucks that our best players in Laurie, Stefano, Blore, AD ( I know he's our Junior but he didn't debut with us) and Luciano aren't WT through and through.

WT would always have 60-70% local Juniors in their squad. In a sense, to me anyway, that was a big part of WT identity.

Adam is definitely Tigers 'through and through' in spite of his brief stint at Souths (the opportunity he took because he wasn't part of the Tigers plans at the time) - If you have access via Fox/Kayo watch his extended interview (it's about 18 minutes) listed as an extra part of the 'Tigertown' series.

He genuinely seems a top bloke and wants his club (that he's loved since he was a kid) to succeed...


I'd still rather want Brooks and Noffa to do well instead of the above (provided they are still here). Simply because they are WT through and through.

I'd be happy for anyone to do well regardless of their background. At some point the club needs to be a bit more ruthless and say 'sorry you're not up to standard' even if they've come through all the way from juniors.

It takes a while to build these connections and everyone makes connections to players in their own way.

I remember back in 2013 or so, an old poster here MacDougal made a thread about Brooks and Moses and this amazing combo they have had since high school. Unfortunately, I just dont have the same connection with AD as I do with Brooks of Noffa.. I remember people used to call him another Utai.

I'm sure AD is a great person and probably a better player than Brooks but it's gonna take years for me to develop the same connection with him.

Initial post I made though was mainly about more of a "what could have been"

Macdougal = @facepalmer
 
@russell said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493537) said:
@426tlgerland said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493310) said:
It’s not about who we keep it’s about who we buy to add strength to our team , our priority should be to add

You have to shed before you add (i.e. create spots in your 30).

We need to lock about 20 of them in a shed .....
 
Simpkin and Liddle must be kept. The current version of V'Landys ball has made the 9 the most important on the field. Penrith are quality right across the park, but don't win without Korisou. I would rather add Grant than Hughes (from Melbourne) for that reason. Only Manly went well without a good 9, but they have the luxury of having a freak #1. If we still had Teddy, we too would have made a couple of finals in the last few years.
 
@tig_prmz said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493748) said:
@pascoes_barber said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493561) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493389) said:
I know we had an opportunity for this in 2016/17 but it sucks that our best players in Laurie, Stefano, Blore, AD ( I know he's our Junior but he didn't debut with us) and Luciano aren't WT through and through.

WT would always have 60-70% local Juniors in their squad. In a sense, to me anyway, that was a big part of WT identity.

Adam is definitely Tigers 'through and through' in spite of his brief stint at Souths (the opportunity he took because he wasn't part of the Tigers plans at the time) - If you have access via Fox/Kayo watch his extended interview (it's about 18 minutes) listed as an extra part of the 'Tigertown' series.

He genuinely seems a top bloke and wants his club (that he's loved since he was a kid) to succeed...


I'd still rather want Brooks and Noffa to do well instead of the above (provided they are still here). Simply because they are WT through and through.

I'd be happy for anyone to do well regardless of their background. At some point the club needs to be a bit more ruthless and say 'sorry you're not up to standard' even if they've come through all the way from juniors.

It takes a while to build these connections and everyone makes connections to players in their own way.

I remember back in 2013 or so, an old poster here MacDougal made a thread about Brooks and Moses and this amazing combo they have had since high school. Unfortunately, I just dont have the same connection with AD as I do with Brooks of Noffa.. I remember people used to call him another Utai.

Noffa? I'd be happy to call him 'recently signed Dragons winger'.
 
@demps said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493749) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493748) said:
@pascoes_barber said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493561) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493389) said:
I know we had an opportunity for this in 2016/17 but it sucks that our best players in Laurie, Stefano, Blore, AD ( I know he's our Junior but he didn't debut with us) and Luciano aren't WT through and through.

WT would always have 60-70% local Juniors in their squad. In a sense, to me anyway, that was a big part of WT identity.

Adam is definitely Tigers 'through and through' in spite of his brief stint at Souths (the opportunity he took because he wasn't part of the Tigers plans at the time) - If you have access via Fox/Kayo watch his extended interview (it's about 18 minutes) listed as an extra part of the 'Tigertown' series.

He genuinely seems a top bloke and wants his club (that he's loved since he was a kid) to succeed...


I'd still rather want Brooks and Noffa to do well instead of the above (provided they are still here). Simply because they are WT through and through.

I'd be happy for anyone to do well regardless of their background. At some point the club needs to be a bit more ruthless and say 'sorry you're not up to standard' even if they've come through all the way from juniors.

It takes a while to build these connections and everyone makes connections to players in their own way.

I remember back in 2013 or so, an old poster here MacDougal made a thread about Brooks and Moses and this amazing combo they have had since high school. Unfortunately, I just dont have the same connection with AD as I do with Brooks of Noffa.. I remember people used to call him another Utai.

I'm sure AD is a great person and probably a better player than Brooks but it's gonna take years for me to develop the same connection with him.

Initial post I made though was mainly about more of a "what could have been"

Macdougal = @facepalmer

Yes it is I, the great MacDougall. The bringer of the Signing Suggestion and Rumours Thread. The cat's out of the bag.
 
@pj said in [Who would you Keep](/post/1493410) said:
1
2 nofo
3
4
5
6
7 Brooks
8
9
10
11
12
13

14
15
16
17

Interesting. Didn't make Brooks captain
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top