It's the Wests Tigers what's the colour of most Tigers?
Not saying WT should not have dominate orange but with that dominance of orange colour and tigers identity, the Western Suburbs Magpies is lost jn translation.
The Magpie was put in place when the agreement was signed in 1999 to ensure it is not lost and forgotten.
WT is not a renamed Balmain Tigers nor is a re-located Balmain Tigers its Wests Tigers, there needs to be some identity to support the Wests component.
Otherwise, its the Wests name that people often omit or is left out from media and print form. In 2014 we have commentators still calling WT Balmain.
Same goes for the White colour that is ignored in licensed merchandise - just plain ignorance.
Or the 'Black & Gold will never fold' catch cry.. James Tedesco staying at Leichhardt, LO - spiritual home of the Tigers etc etc All Balmain Tigers centric. Dozens of other examples.
Had this debate hundreds of times (cue acknowledgement from GNR4LFE) As i said in my previous post, its an issue to some because its less obvious then traces of Balmain Tigers.
If Balmain Tigers was in NRL today, what would be different from WT? Apart from playing four games at Campbelltown and the name Wests on the jersey - Nothing.
- there would be modernised jerseys
- there would be a modernised Tigers emblem
- they would still be called a Black and Gold team
- they would prob be playing half LO half ANZ
- they would still be called Tigers in every form of print, online, radio and TV
When it comes down to it.. All Balmain have really lost is the name Balmain where Western Suburbs Magpies have lost a lot more of their identity.
_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_