Why I think Ipswich footy would work in the NRL

Goose

New member
I watched the game on the weekend and again yesterday, I have now seen the jets only half a dozen times, so not much as others, but Im convinced the Walker brothers style would be successful in the NRL.

My thoughts why
1.Stops line speed in the middle- The current NRL defensive philosophy is about winning the tackle and when possible rushing up with the inside defenders to prevent the attack getting on the front foot. We all talk about line speed, that looping run from DH, dropping blokes on the inside or going wider and often throwing a couple passes with ball runners going in different directions prevents this, you could potentially rush 3 defenders up on either side of the ruck (but not for long) but the reality is you wont be able to do that and shooting your tight defenders up leaves a gap to be exploited. This is why they make the same distance as a normal hit up, even know they go sideways, and throw a couple passes.

2\. Creates a lot more 1 on 1's- The ball movement means that players have to stay in the channel and the initial contact is often 1 on 1 and it takes longer for a second man to get there to help. This obviously has loads of advantages, quicker play the balls more offloads (which creates more 1 on 1's) and of course 1 on 1's are more likely to lead to more breaks.

3\. It makes more defenders more accountable on each play- has they hit more channels more often and switch directions a couple of times, it brings more defenders into each play , this will make more players work harder, increase fatigue, as well as offering more opportunity to catch out someone clocking off for a second. I reckon this will further slow down line speed etc.

4\. More defensive decisions have to be made- Obviously the more questions you ask, the more likely you are to get one wrong, especially if it is not the same decision that is being made every other game.

5\. I dont think there is that much more risk- The initial ball movement to get them going, isnt going to lead to all that many mistakes, and that leads to the other passes (the offloads) being slightly easier, they will have a slightly higher error count, but it wont be like it will be 50% completion every week.

6\. It will be harder to prepare against- It is different, most teams play the same, somethign different maybe harder to match against. It changes the just worry about our game mantra (which is easy to do if everyone does the same thing every week)
 
You need mobile hard working forwards with skill as opposed to the robot hit up play the ball as fast as I can crop we have now.
 
@Goose said:
I watched the game on the weekend and again yesterday, I have now seen the jets only half a dozen times, so not much as others, but Im convinced the Walker brothers style would be successful in the NRL.

My thoughts why
1.Stops line speed in the middle- The current NRL defensive philosophy is about winning the tackle and when possible rushing up with the inside defenders to prevent the attack getting on the front foot. We all talk about line speed, that looping run from DH, dropping blokes on the inside or going wider and often throwing a couple passes with ball runners going in different directions prevents this, you could potentially rush 3 defenders up on either side of the ruck (but not for long) but the reality is you wont be able to do that and shooting your tight defenders up leaves a gap to be exploited. This is why they make the same distance as a normal hit up, even know they go sideways, and throw a couple passes.

2\. Creates a lot more 1 on 1's- The ball movement means that players have to stay in the channel and the initial contact is often 1 on 1 and it takes longer for a second man to get there to help. This obviously has loads of advantages, quicker play the balls more offloads (which creates more 1 on 1's) and of course 1 on 1's are more likely to lead to more breaks.

3\. It makes more defenders more accountable on each play- has they hit more channels more often and switch directions a couple of times, it brings more defenders into each play , this will make more players work harder, increase fatigue, as well as offering more opportunity to catch out someone clocking off for a second. I reckon this will further slow down line speed etc.

4\. More defensive decisions have to be made- Obviously the more questions you ask, the more likely you are to get one wrong, especially if it is not the same decision that is being made every other game.

5\. I dont think there is that much more risk- The initial ball movement to get them going, isnt going to lead to all that many mistakes, and that leads to the other passes (the offloads) being slightly easier, they will have a slightly higher error count, but it wont be like it will be 50% completion every week.

6\. It will be harder to prepare against- It is different, most teams play the same, somethign different maybe harder to match against. It changes the just worry about our game mantra (which is easy to do if everyone does the same thing every week)

Like you, I've only seen a few games of theirs( the last three to be exact)
And I've been surprised how few times they seem to get bogged down in the centre when in possession. The defences don't get as much time to be wrestling around with them as usual when a team simply hits it up .
When they go sideways, if nothing comes from it they will change direction and go wide again. As you said Goose, they ask questions of the defence each time hey change
Direction until someone gets lazy .
A big thing about their game though is that they have Barba on the outside with his speed.
Both wingers play wide and are always ready for a switch wide when they just look like they are going to be probing with those Criss cross plays.
I don think there is anything that shows that it would not work in the NRL .

The game is now a robotic bore, and anything that can be a bit different is a good thing and certainly is worth a try.
The walkers deserve a lot of credit for having the guts to play different,
Their idea of turning any situation into a contest , such as the short kickoffs, etc are somethings that I've always been surprised that no ones done that more often before , as its a 50 % chance of regaining Possession , against mostly no chance of getting it back. The ground loss is mostly worth

These guys practice this stuff, and are good at it and even though they were a qld team, I couldn't have happier with their win. They deserved it.
 
Rugby union over the last 20 years has now become a contest on the kickoff. Pat Richards' kickoffs breathed life into the restarts for our mob last year, but were unfortunately nixed this year.
 
I think the Jets style of footy would only have limited success in the rigours of NRL. Defence in reserve grade is obviously just a shadow of what it is in firsts. NRL coaches spend 24/7 studying how to become more successful, you would think if that style of play would revolutionize the NRL they would have clued onto it a while back. It would certainly keep defences guessing a bit more but too much of that style relies on luck,especially those constant short drop-outs, NRL sides would rack up a cricket score receiving the ball in such good field position if those gambles don't pay off.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top