jirskyr
Well-known member
@ said:@ said:@ said:Let's call it for what it is
The nrl and WT mgmt know what they are doing. We are the suckers for not saving what we have before it's gone
Over the last few years games played out of Campbelltown and Leichhardt have been against out of town teams.
Why?
So when they get rid of them, the crowd numbers justify it.
7-10k crowds on average aren't good enough.
If it was tigers v parra at Leichhardt it would sell out
Instead we play teams like the storm there.
They don't care about club history. They aren't fans. They are business people.
So what would be the point of playing parra at LO and selling out? Doesn't it make sense to play at Homebush and getting a larger crowd?
Everyone thinks that the last game last year was great because it sold out. Al I saw was people getting locked out. **Not a great way to grow your prodict.**
I call BS.
If we are selling a product on TV - which is going to look better?
A packed leichardt oval with 22,000 fans
A half empty homebush
thefore it is better for the game as more money is made from TV rights than through ticket sales.
You are confusing the stakeholder's primary concerns though.
Yes NRL pulls primary revenue from TV and Tigers rely on that revenue, but Tigers are not in any way responsible for TV broadcasting rights and have no say in the scheduling or broadcasting of games.
The only thing Tigers own and control in relation to games is match-day profit. So whether or not the stadium _looks_ full is fairly irrelevant to the club, even if it's relevant to the NRL. Certainly a 50%-full Homebush at 40K is financially in a different stratosphere to a sell-out LO at 19K.