So they appoint Hartigan ... that fails and he’s sacked. They appoint Sheens who recommends to the Board that Madge be sacked ... so they rubber stamp that.
If you have to constantly undo your decisions, you’re making bad ones.
Sack the CEO, back when he cheated the cap.
He’s a koala mate, untouchable
Fixing the leaks ...
It's a catch 22 situation. You can't be looking for a new coach with Madge still there. You can't fire Madge without a good replacement. However, compare that to how Sharks handled Morris- pretty much said we want you to finish the year but we don't want you for the year after. They treated him with a bit more respect than what we treated Madge with.
Ducks ought to have been in a row though.
Nah I won’t pin that on front office. But signing him as a 20 min bench forward at the Dragons and making him our main impact forward is symbolic of what Madge inherited.
Probably more culture in some of the blocked pipes they remedy
And possibly paying him out in the process to contest a title
Probably don't agree about when he should have been sacked but agree 100% that he should have been gone a while ago. Apart from the failure of the club during his tenure, he is one of the most unimpressive fellows you'd ever see in a CEO role.
Delivers a fantastic one sentence quote whenever someone is lucky enough to leave the organisation though.
And announcing it to the world before both clubs had agreed to terms with Luc.
a dogs eye with extra sauce,smack.bang on into the members box
