pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
@Nelson said in [Xerri Stood Down after Drug Test](/post/1152724) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Xerri Stood Down after Drug Test](/post/1152716) said:@Nelson said in [Xerri Stood Down after Drug Test](/post/1152711) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Xerri Stood Down after Drug Test](/post/1152707) said:Does anyone else agree a review needs to be undertaken into what measures were put in place by the Sharks following the peptides saga ? I would imagine if measures were in place, why was their star 19 year old centre able to use this type of drug without being detected by his coach and other professional trainers?
The club has a duty of care and potentially this is the end of this teenagers career. The outcome could have been potentially so much better had the club detected the use and voluntarily approached ASADA to make a deal. I think Peter Vlandys has a big decision to make about the.Sharks.
I'm sure the club does have a duty of care but that does not mean they assume all responsibility for his actions. He could easily have been influenced by dodgy mates or family or made his own decision to seek out these types of substances because he didn't want his career being slowed down by injury. How are his coach and trainers supposed to monitor his every act? Unless they're blood testing him or he's showing overt signs of substance abuse they really have no way of knowing. I'm not sure what measures you think the club could have taken to prevent a player taking substances outside of the club's grounds of his own volition (which for all we know at this stage could have been the scenario).
I can't see PVL doing anything to punish the Sharks unless they are somehow implicated in evidence yet to be revealed. I don't see why it should have been incumbent on them (as distinct from any other club) to implement a testing regime over and above the ASADA regime. If the NRL want to introduce that then it has to be across the board, and I'm pretty sure the RLPA would not be keen on subjecting its members to further intrusive blood testing.
It is noticeable how solid he had become in the shoulders and chest in a reasonably short period of time following shoulder surgery. This is a teenager with not many NRL games experience. In addition, his sprint Coach made comment of his increase in pace over other NRL players from other clubs who themselves are quick. All in all, more than enough for an NRL coach and professional staff to have that chat with the player.
He's 19 and training professionally, it's not necessarily outside the norm that he would bulk up significantly or improve his pace. Plenty do so naturally at that age and some do at even younger ages. So someone from the club should have gone up to him and by implication or otherwise suggested he was juicing, and then expected him to give an honest response if he was? That seems a little unrealistic to me.
I believe the Club would keep player stats on sprint times , weight etc and would have at least an informed knowledge of what is possible and what is not. I don't doubt science is available to assist. An NRL coach having a one on one expressing concern for the teenager"s well being is not unrealistic.