Yileen Gordon released

@underdog said:
Thing is lads, it's not like he's 17 or 18.

He's 26 years old. Old enough for you to look at it and say…. hmm..... something isn't quite right in his head.

It's strange behaviour if anything.

Maturity doesn't come with age. Fact is, if a good number of NRL players weren't good enough to make it, they'd be collecting Centrelink checks every week. This thread and what he did is a case in point. Footy players aren't the brightest bunch going around.
 
I can only assume he's missing a chromosome or two to do such an idiotic thing. Peanut.
 
You can't put brains in a statue…what this does is give someone else the opportunity To wear the club colours and try to achieve an NRL career ,this probable is a blessing in disguise .On a side note I'm so glad for the change in the Weststigers philosophy of no more crap taken,if Sheens was still there so would Gordon with a reprimand !
 
Not sure if the image on this thread http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showthread.php?p=9873624 is a joke, or what he really wrote?
Surely you wouldn't get sacked for that.
 
@ferret said:
W :brick: wee should sign young James Livock 130kg prop in the Tele this morning give im a go.

x 2

… heard Wayne Bennet & Souths were interested a while ago.
Who knows whats happened though
 
Personally, I find the whole episode of NRL players going to schools to talk about "bullying" a bit weird (anyway …..shouldn't it be anti-bullying??) whether they are Wests Tigers or anyone else. I think the concept is way above their intellect or communication capacity to have any meaningful impact on kids. If it's some kind of societal impact on an issue like anti-bullying that we're after , it's not going to come from some barely coherent, trite, (hopefully) rehearsed message from some guy those same kids are going to watch on TV belt the crap out of someone else during the season. Do you think those kids are clever enough to differentiate between bullying behaviour and the type of physical contact in NRL they see on TV? I don't. If it's about "sportsmanship" or "healthy lifestyle leading to success" I think that's a much better message.
 
@DonnyBrasco said:
Not sure if the image on this thread http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showthread.php?p=9873624 is a joke, or what he really wrote?
Surely you wouldn't get sacked for that.

"Rooney eats it" is a classic piece of graffiti from the movie Ferris Buellers Day Off - a comedic masterpiece of the 1980's.
\
\
hmm, glad to see my obvious troll thread over there has caused a stir.. :roll

I honestly though I'd posted there before, oh well there you go.
 
From reports in the media, he signed in under an assumed name, Mike …. i'm sure you can work out the rest. Signing into a school, let that sink in

Think the guy needs to be tested for global developmental delay
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
From reports in the media, he signed in under an assumed name, Mike …. i'm sure you can work out the rest. Signing into a school, let that sink in

Think the guy needs to be tested for global developmental delay

Ahh….. as in Karmichael.

Gotcha.

Wow, what a clueless buffoon.
 
@LCA said:
Personally, I find the whole episode of NRL players going to schools to talk about "bullying" a bit weird (anyway …..shouldn't it be anti-bullying??) whether they are Wests Tigers or anyone else. I think the concept is way above their intellect or communication capacity to have any meaningful impact on kids. If it's some kind of societal impact on an issue like anti-bullying that we're after , it's not going to come from some barely coherent, trite, (hopefully) rehearsed message from some guy those same kids are going to watch on TV belt the crap out of someone else during the season. Do you think those kids are clever enough to differentiate between bullying behaviour and the type of physical contact in NRL they see on TV? I don't. If it's about "sportsmanship" or "healthy lifestyle leading to success" I think that's a much better message.

1) you are underestimating the intelligence of players for example, farah graduated from USyd in 2010 with a Bachellor in Economics.

2) Kids look up to their idols and professional sportsman in general, I'm sure even a tigers kid would listen to something Hayne had to say.

3) I'm sure if they are talking about bullying they are going adress it as a problem and elaborate on that, not giving ideas on how to bully (maybe thats what Yileen did lol )
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
From reports in the media, he signed in under an assumed name, Mike …. i'm sure you can work out the rest. Signing into a school, let that sink in

Think the guy needs to be tested for global developmental delay

thats not as bad as i thought it was gonna be. I was thinking something rracist, homophobic or maybe making fun of bullying victims.

it's a crude joke ( although not gonna lie i laughed the first time i heard it and many times after) but i seriously doubt Robbie or Brooks would get the cut for something like that.
 
@pHyR3 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
From reports in the media, he signed in under an assumed name, Mike …. i'm sure you can work out the rest. Signing into a school, let that sink in

Think the guy needs to be tested for global developmental delay

thats not as bad as i thought it was gonna be. I was thinking something rracist, homophobic or maybe making fun of bullying victims.

it's a crude joke ( although not gonna lie i laughed the first time i heard it and many times after) but i seriously doubt Robbie or Brooks would get the cut for something like that.

The thing is, I doubt Farah OR Brooks would do something so juvenile.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
From reports in the media, he signed in under an assumed name, Mike …. i'm sure you can work out the rest. Signing into a school, let that sink in

Think the guy needs to be tested for global developmental delay

Was it Mike Hunt ?
I'm not so sure I can work it out ?

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@pHyR3 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
From reports in the media, he signed in under an assumed name, Mike …. i'm sure you can work out the rest. Signing into a school, let that sink in

Think the guy needs to be tested for global developmental delay

thats not as bad as i thought it was gonna be. I was thinking something rracist, homophobic or maybe making fun of bullying victims.

it's a crude joke ( although not gonna lie i laughed the first time i heard it and many times after) but i seriously doubt Robbie or Brooks would get the cut for something like that.

Put it in to context, the guy was at a primary school, 6-12 yr olds. Highly inappropriate. I work in a school, if i did something like that, i'd be sacked. Its not the environment for that kind of stuff.
 
@underdog said:
@pHyR3 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
From reports in the media, he signed in under an assumed name, Mike …. i'm sure you can work out the rest. Signing into a school, let that sink in

Think the guy needs to be tested for global developmental delay

thats not as bad as i thought it was gonna be. I was thinking something rracist, homophobic or maybe making fun of bullying victims.

it's a crude joke ( although not gonna lie i laughed the first time i heard it and many times after) but i seriously doubt Robbie or Brooks would get the cut for something like that.

The thing is, I doubt Farah OR Brooks would do something so juvenile.

agreed, it's a little redudant. but still….

anyway, it doesnt matter. no big loss
 
@pHyR3 said:
@LCA said:
Personally, I find the whole episode of NRL players going to schools to talk about "bullying" a bit weird (anyway …..shouldn't it be anti-bullying??) whether they are Wests Tigers or anyone else. I think the concept is way above their intellect or communication capacity to have any meaningful impact on kids. If it's some kind of societal impact on an issue like anti-bullying that we're after , it's not going to come from some barely coherent, trite, (hopefully) rehearsed message from some guy those same kids are going to watch on TV belt the crap out of someone else during the season. Do you think those kids are clever enough to differentiate between bullying behaviour and the type of physical contact in NRL they see on TV? I don't. If it's about "sportsmanship" or "healthy lifestyle leading to success" I think that's a much better message.

1) you are underestimating the intelligence of players for example, farah graduated from USyd in 2010 with a Bachellor in Economics.

2) Kids look up to their idols and professional sportsman in general, I'm sure even a tigers kid would listen to something Hayne had to say.

3) I'm sure if they are talking about bullying they are going adress it as a problem and elaborate on that, not giving ideas on how to bully (maybe thats what Yileen did lol )

i think LCA has a valid point in that although they are looked up to by kids, not all league players are going to be university educated and they are basically thrust into PR-type roles with little (i imagine) training. or in this case, little brains.

while it is great to have people kids look up to, professional players these days have a lot on their plate and also i think there should be particular players allocated to these roles, others for whatever other peripheral services they are more suited to that are required by the club.

i dont know. are there so many community things tigers players have to do that spreads them too thin?
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@pHyR3 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
From reports in the media, he signed in under an assumed name, Mike …. i'm sure you can work out the rest. Signing into a school, let that sink in

Think the guy needs to be tested for global developmental delay

thats not as bad as i thought it was gonna be. I was thinking something rracist, homophobic or maybe making fun of bullying victims.

it's a crude joke ( although not gonna lie i laughed the first time i heard it and many times after) but i seriously doubt Robbie or Brooks would get the cut for something like that.

Put it in to context, the guy was at a primary school, 6-12 yr olds. Highly inappropriate. I work in a school, if i did something like that, i'd be sacked. Its not the environment for that kind of stuff.

Im not passing an opinion on what he apparently did one way or the other; but you say put it in context - you work in a school and you would be sacked if you did what he did - well, if you were spirited into a first grade rugby league game, how would you measure up?
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top