Zac Cini

@cochise said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358062) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358059) said:
@gallagher said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358042) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

How many got caught out last night? Howe many could you drop?

Unfortunately we only have a top 30 (28 or 29 at the moment) and the depth and quality is pretty questionable.

Better depth than a lot of teams

If that's the case, who have we got as 1st grade quality wingers to call up.

Our options in the backs in general are pretty thin.

Don't get me wrong, I think we have some promising players coming through, but when are they going to be ready for NRL and that is assuming that we get to keep them for the longer term.
 
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358495) said:
@cochise said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358062) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358059) said:
@gallagher said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358042) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

How many got caught out last night? Howe many could you drop?

Unfortunately we only have a top 30 (28 or 29 at the moment) and the depth and quality is pretty questionable.

Better depth than a lot of teams

If that's the case, who have we got as 1st grade quality wingers to call up.

Our options in the backs in general are pretty thin.

Don't get me wrong, I think we have some promising players coming through, but when are they going to be ready for NRL and that is assuming that we get to keep them for the longer term.

We should have pursued Jason Saab

Add buying a quality winger to the list of many priorities
 
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358419) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358129) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358041) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

That's exactly how you destroy the confidence of every player in the backline, an and destroy and chemistry/combinations between players

Lots of points here.

Does confidence have any impact on performance or does performance impact confidence ? My take is that any player who gets dropped and then loses all confidence and cannot play to a high level again isn't a first grader.

As for chemistry and combinations I agree with you but we are losing anyway.

I'm also not stating drop every single player. I'm just stating when they get caught out like Cini was. That was extreme and not a little stuff up.

He needs to work on aspects of his game. He doesn't offer enough to accept his shortcomings especially in a position like winger.

it's about becoming a technically better player without the pressure of performing in first grade.

Last week he produced the best performance from any of our wingers all season. By a mile. That in itself warrants a second chance.

Nof, Kepaoa and Talau have all survived numerous shocking performances. For Madge to start picking and choosing which players deserve a second chance would be very dangerous.

That is Madges job and calling it dangerous makes no sense at all.

None of those players dropped the ball as much as Cini did the other night.
 
@speed2burn said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358497) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358495) said:
@cochise said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358062) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358059) said:
@gallagher said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358042) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

How many got caught out last night? Howe many could you drop?

Unfortunately we only have a top 30 (28 or 29 at the moment) and the depth and quality is pretty questionable.

Better depth than a lot of teams

If that's the case, who have we got as 1st grade quality wingers to call up.

Our options in the backs in general are pretty thin.

Don't get me wrong, I think we have some promising players coming through, but when are they going to be ready for NRL and that is assuming that we get to keep them for the longer term.

We should have pursued Jason Saab

Add buying a quality winger to the list of many priorities

Why didn't we purchase Saab when we had a very real strong chance to do so?
 
@speed2burn said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358497) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358495) said:
@cochise said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358062) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358059) said:
@gallagher said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358042) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

How many got caught out last night? Howe many could you drop?

Unfortunately we only have a top 30 (28 or 29 at the moment) and the depth and quality is pretty questionable.

Better depth than a lot of teams

If that's the case, who have we got as 1st grade quality wingers to call up.

Our options in the backs in general are pretty thin.

Don't get me wrong, I think we have some promising players coming through, but when are they going to be ready for NRL and that is assuming that we get to keep them for the longer term.

We should have pursued Jason Saab

Add buying a quality winger to the list of many priorities

We did. I don't think he was ever interested. Manly offered him a good deal the same way they offered Aloiai and then mysteriously his personal issues surfaced for both of them that led them to go there.
 
@rihannafan1 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358512) said:
@speed2burn said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358497) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358495) said:
@cochise said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358062) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358059) said:
@gallagher said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358042) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

How many got caught out last night? Howe many could you drop?

Unfortunately we only have a top 30 (28 or 29 at the moment) and the depth and quality is pretty questionable.

Better depth than a lot of teams

If that's the case, who have we got as 1st grade quality wingers to call up.

Our options in the backs in general are pretty thin.

Don't get me wrong, I think we have some promising players coming through, but when are they going to be ready for NRL and that is assuming that we get to keep them for the longer term.

We should have pursued Jason Saab

Add buying a quality winger to the list of many priorities

We did. I don't think he was ever interested. Manly offered him a good deal the same way they offered Aloiai and then mysteriously his personal issues surfaced for both of them that led them to go there.

I have no idea what went down ... maybe we got too comfortable with AJ / Talau who have been less than impressive
 
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358510) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358419) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358129) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358041) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

That's exactly how you destroy the confidence of every player in the backline, an and destroy and chemistry/combinations between players

Lots of points here.

Does confidence have any impact on performance or does performance impact confidence ? My take is that any player who gets dropped and then loses all confidence and cannot play to a high level again isn't a first grader.

As for chemistry and combinations I agree with you but we are losing anyway.

I'm also not stating drop every single player. I'm just stating when they get caught out like Cini was. That was extreme and not a little stuff up.

He needs to work on aspects of his game. He doesn't offer enough to accept his shortcomings especially in a position like winger.

it's about becoming a technically better player without the pressure of performing in first grade.

Last week he produced the best performance from any of our wingers all season. By a mile. That in itself warrants a second chance.

Nof, Kepaoa and Talau have all survived numerous shocking performances. For Madge to start picking and choosing which players deserve a second chance would be very dangerous.

That is Madges job and calling it dangerous makes no sense at all.

None of those players dropped the ball as much as Cini did the other night.

The real question is - he's had 1 good game, 1 bad game, will he repeat the bad game or learn from his mistakes? Everyone has a bad game, I personally think it's unrealistic to drop someone the instant they have 1 bad game, especially inside their first 2 matches.

If you drop Cini now you give him no opportunity to show he's learned anything.
 
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358510) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358419) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358129) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358041) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

That's exactly how you destroy the confidence of every player in the backline, an and destroy and chemistry/combinations between players

Lots of points here.

Does confidence have any impact on performance or does performance impact confidence ? My take is that any player who gets dropped and then loses all confidence and cannot play to a high level again isn't a first grader.

As for chemistry and combinations I agree with you but we are losing anyway.

I'm also not stating drop every single player. I'm just stating when they get caught out like Cini was. That was extreme and not a little stuff up.

He needs to work on aspects of his game. He doesn't offer enough to accept his shortcomings especially in a position like winger.

it's about becoming a technically better player without the pressure of performing in first grade.

Last week he produced the best performance from any of our wingers all season. By a mile. That in itself warrants a second chance.

Nof, Kepaoa and Talau have all survived numerous shocking performances. For Madge to start picking and choosing which players deserve a second chance would be very dangerous.

That is Madges job and calling it dangerous makes no sense at all.

None of those players dropped the ball as much as Cini did the other night.

Showing favouritism is dangerous.

Players have missed far more tackles than he has. And that's far worse then dropping bombs. Missed tackles lead directly to tries... He's a much better defensive player than our other wingers.
 
@needaname said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358422) said:
Madge only promotes and demoted based on defensive output. Not sure Cini did much wrong there.
If we are building to the future I’d stick Cini at Centre put MBye on the bench and bring talau back on the wing. Hooker can be a heads or tails flip between Simpkin and Liddle. Unfortunately MByes position is off the bench.

Besides the dropped balls, if he did well tackling I would give him the opportunity to rebuild his confidence. One less defensive hole we have to fix is a positive. Anyway let's hope he gets back to his best.
 
@jirskyr said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358543) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358510) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358419) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358129) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358041) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

That's exactly how you destroy the confidence of every player in the backline, an and destroy and chemistry/combinations between players

Lots of points here.

Does confidence have any impact on performance or does performance impact confidence ? My take is that any player who gets dropped and then loses all confidence and cannot play to a high level again isn't a first grader.

As for chemistry and combinations I agree with you but we are losing anyway.

I'm also not stating drop every single player. I'm just stating when they get caught out like Cini was. That was extreme and not a little stuff up.

He needs to work on aspects of his game. He doesn't offer enough to accept his shortcomings especially in a position like winger.

it's about becoming a technically better player without the pressure of performing in first grade.

Last week he produced the best performance from any of our wingers all season. By a mile. That in itself warrants a second chance.

Nof, Kepaoa and Talau have all survived numerous shocking performances. For Madge to start picking and choosing which players deserve a second chance would be very dangerous.

That is Madges job and calling it dangerous makes no sense at all.

None of those players dropped the ball as much as Cini did the other night.

The real question is - he's had 1 good game, 1 bad game, will he repeat the bad game or learn from his mistakes? Everyone has a bad game, I personally think it's unrealistic to drop someone the instant they have 1 bad game, especially inside their first 2 matches.

If you drop Cini now you give him no opportunity to show he's learned anything.

Fair point in relation to see how he goes next game. I think though he gets the opportunity in reserves.

I like him and if anything I feel that he needs more development time.
 
@speed2burn said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358497) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358495) said:
@cochise said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358062) said:
@hank37w said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358059) said:
@gallagher said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358042) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

How many got caught out last night? Howe many could you drop?

Unfortunately we only have a top 30 (28 or 29 at the moment) and the depth and quality is pretty questionable.

Better depth than a lot of teams

If that's the case, who have we got as 1st grade quality wingers to call up.

Our options in the backs in general are pretty thin.

Don't get me wrong, I think we have some promising players coming through, but when are they going to be ready for NRL and that is assuming that we get to keep them for the longer term.

We should have pursued Jason Saab

Add buying a quality winger to the list of many priorities

Same reason we didn’t get Lomax, Schuste, Addo-Carr, Latrell no one want to come here.
 
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358612) said:
Fair point in relation to see how he goes next game. I think though he gets the opportunity in reserves.

I would put it to you he's spent enough time in reserves this year to show he can play above that level, and that's exactly why he was promoted in the first place, although I don't think he was in the coach's consideration as of Round 1.

If Cini turns around and has a blinder in reserves, does that prove anything other than he's capable of playing above reserve grade, which we already knew?
 
@jirskyr said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358695) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358612) said:
Fair point in relation to see how he goes next game. I think though he gets the opportunity in reserves.

I would put it to you he's spent enough time in reserves this year to show he can play above that level, and that's exactly why he was promoted in the first place, although I don't think he was in the coach's consideration as of Round 1.

If Cini turns around and has a blinder in reserves, does that prove anything other than he's capable of playing above reserve grade, which we already knew?

I've only watched 3 reserve games this year, but he was a standout in all 3 for me. No doubt Madge has been watching him and that form counts.
Honestly I don't see him having as bad a game as that one ever again. In firsts or reserves.
He's got some ticker. I back him.
 
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358419) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358129) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Zac Cini](/post/1358041) said:
@earl said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357991) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Zac Cini](/post/1357503) said:
IMO you can NOT pick him next week,

He will be bombed into the stone age immediately. You can so "so what, he gets a chance to make up for it"...but he had that chance after the 3rd or fourth chance today.

Let him catch bombs for a few weeks in KOE. We can not afford that in first grade.

I totally agree. We need to rotate players until they don't get caught out. If they get caught out drop them and tell them they have to learn in reserve grade. Fix the problem and perform in reserve grade and you will get another chance.

That's exactly how you destroy the confidence of every player in the backline, an and destroy and chemistry/combinations between players

Lots of points here.

Does confidence have any impact on performance or does performance impact confidence ? My take is that any player who gets dropped and then loses all confidence and cannot play to a high level again isn't a first grader.

As for chemistry and combinations I agree with you but we are losing anyway.

I'm also not stating drop every single player. I'm just stating when they get caught out like Cini was. That was extreme and not a little stuff up.

He needs to work on aspects of his game. He doesn't offer enough to accept his shortcomings especially in a position like winger.

it's about becoming a technically better player without the pressure of performing in first grade.

Last week he produced the best performance from any of our wingers all season. By a mile. That in itself warrants a second chance.

Nof, Kepaoa and Talau have all survived numerous shocking performances. For Madge to start picking and choosing which players deserve a second chance would be very dangerous.

Agree Nof talau and kepoa have all survived one shocker at least. Give Cini another shot
 

Members online

Back
Top