@magpie_magic said in [Shipbuilding Osborne Naval Shipyard South Aust](/post/1474415) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Shipbuilding Osborne Naval Shipyard South Aust](/post/1474396) said:
@magpie_magic said in [Shipbuilding Osborne Naval Shipyard South Aust](/post/1474269) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Shipbuilding Osborne Naval Shipyard South Aust](/post/1474240) said:
@don_kershane said in [Shipbuilding Osborne Naval Shipyard South Aust](/post/1474220) said:
Just get on with the deal. We don't need boofheads like Dutton loud mouthing to China (for domestic consumption] just to upstage Morrison and wedge Labor before he has his next tilt at the leadership. Morrison laying the groundwork for a Children Overboard type scare campaign and will try to out shout Dutton at every opportunity . Not looking forward to being exposed to the drivel coming our way from these two.
Agree with this 1000%. I’m a strong believer in my life as well as my kids that you walk silently and see carry a big stick. It’s always the quiet ones you have to worry about and the big talkers are usually nervous. If you wanted to make a statement to China the best way would just announce you bought the subs and shut up.
And sadly we didn't walk silently and the only statement we made to China is that we are just a mega proxie and mouthpiece for the US and sold out any little leverage we had with their foreign policy regards how it affects us while Morrison wears masks probably made in China to protect him from the China virus.
Interestingly, Blinken mentioned the US will protect Australia from economic coercion from China. Yeah well iron ore is down to $107 and the American investment banks are probably shorting our dollar as we speak.
Just like a bum wipe, nobody likes proxies, despised by their adversaries and loathed by their friends
Not sure how you suggest we stop being a "proxy" and get around the immutable fact that our potential enemy has a population of 1.5B, our biggest ally has a population of 350M and our population is 25M.
There will never be a day where we dont rely on allies for defence in a global conflict.
Yes, as you say carry a big stick but there's more of them than you can point a stick at lol. And I think they are 1.6 billion, whats 100m up or down.
But China isn't an enemy to us so much, historically China is an inward looking nation
Historically China has been an inward looking nation, kinda but they invaded Japan and Korea and North Korea is clearly an Chinese proxy. Have you been paykng attention to what happened in Hong Kong? When XI said he would use force to annex Taiwan in 2019? The building of islands in the South China Sea? Are these the acts of an inward looking nation?
>***like Russia are*** contrary to US fantasies about global hegemony which most don't want anyway,
Um....Ukraine, Estonia, Lithuania, Lithuania, Belarus, Georgia, Chechnya, Dagastan, Khazakstan, Armenia, Azerbajian, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia/H, Chechia, Slovak Republic, Poland, and half of Germany all wave hello as does my partners family who fled under gunfire as refugees from Russians who had no interest in Global hegemony.
>global balance is a good thing in my opinion. It forces the Americans as well as the Russians and Chinese to be better to gain influence.
Thats fine as a concept, but first look at the underlying principles.
But we need allies and the US makes a good one, but on terms that also suit us. The submarines are a good choice but we could adopt the stance of other so called 5 eyes partners like NZ and Canada and have spent less in Iraq and Afghanistan and used the savings on a bigger military that can operate more independently. That way we would have greater leverage on the Americans regarding foreign policy in the Asia Pacific.
I would NOT use NZ as an example in the context of 5 eyes.
See, if China makes a play on Taiwan we wouldn't want to go there and we should advise the US as much.
Seriously, why. Based on what principle.
If China makes a play on South Korea would it be worth defending? Japan?
Why not Taiwan?
>If the Americans were to try to defend Taiwan it would be like an away cricket match with local umpires, seems like they could loose the conflict or even if they win they loose because they would need to retain a presence in Taiwan forever because it's in China's front yard and they would try again. That type of posture would ruin the US economically. So sanity would probably prevail and the Americans would grind their teeth and impose sanctions......And guess who looses there.....We do especially without technology, industry etc.
So principles only matter if you can win? Thats the end of civilisation. Why do you think that China have not done a Hong Kong on Taiwan?