Lee claims everyone is accountable. How?
There seems to be a lot of dubious decisions being made. Example, why give a coach a 2 year extension, then proceed to white ant the guy at the start of that extension period?
It appears as though the board is in constant conflict with itself?
Some members not willing to accept the umpire’s decision?
It seems all too easy to point to the ladder position and say the results aren’t there.
Regardless of all the “talking up” of the club, I see the sacking of a coach as a negative move, particularly this coach, it reflects poorly on the organisation more than the coach who was sacked.
The so called review of the football department became simply a which hunt performance appraisal of the coach, in which the numbers were crunched, 3 wins, halfway through the season.
Let’s put aside the Bulldogs win and focus on the wins against Eels and Rabbits. Where did those two wins come from? Let’s just say it didn’t look good for those who wanted Madge out.
We’re now told not to expect results for 3 years as we try to copy the organisational structure and behavioural characteristics of the Panthers. Last time it was the Storm.
If we get the decision makers out of the removal dongas and into a new plush office change the way the decisions are made?
