The club had to make modifications to their plans as it was failing, so I have no idea why they're being labelled incompetent just because another coach hasn't immediately come in to replace him. I trust there's a strategic plan in place and we're just watching them follow the process through.The board had a tough job after the financial demise of the Balmain side for which was an abomination for which they had nothing to do with and has resulted in a potential reduction of income of the JV to bring in the bacon and keep that side included while retaining control of the former Balmain Leagues for the club to prevent third party parasites.
For football matters they have delegated to a football manager and coaching staff.
If the board must be questioned it must be on the basis of the people that they have delegated to i.e. Sheens .
To be honest Cleary forward I'm happy with all the coaching and assistant selections. Player recruiting must be the primary responsibility of the football manager and head coach.
Things just haven't worked out till now.
IMO the club's inability to correctly devise and execute a succession plan is what has negatively impacted both the credibility of the club and the team's ability to remain competitive.
However during the past week not only have they publicly outlined the criteria for which the decision was made to sack Madge but they've also clearly identified the main requirements of the coaching role, for his successor, and included defined goals or objectives with risk management/mitigation - to prevent another Ivan fiasco from happening as well as the ongoing problem for previous coaches with cap constraints and limitations with building their own roster.
It's unheard of for the WTs.