Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Liddle showed a lot of promise but never really went up a gear.

His strength, imo is running the ball & his weakness is passing and possibly his cardio... as from what I've seen, he's never been an 80 minute player.

I think he still has a lot to offer in the game & wish him the best at his new club.

I don't think he'll let anyone down at his new club but we've got hooker covered, it would appear and need to strengthen other positions.

No hard feelings, Jacob.
Good luck. 🌹🐯

Been thinking about it a bit (With the benefit of hindsight) There's been plenty of those young blokes that never kicked on under the last coaching structure....
 
Mmmm…..that certainly goes in the face of all the hoopla about keeping Brooks, I don’t disagree with you, but imho I don’t think LB will be playing anywhere but 7.
Thinking Jacko will start at 13 but I’ve been wrong before. All part of the mystery !

In my own little dream world it'd be Hastings at 7 and Munster at 6.

In reality I reckon it'll be Hastings 13, Brooks 7 and Doueihi at 6. Maybe we'll get a year or two of good attacking footy. I wonder if Doueihi or Brooks move on and we play that kid from Queensland at 6 or 13.

I know this is a signing thread but I just don't see the talent out there for us to really improve. I reckon we'll only improve via our juniors.
 
Apparently according to "The POM" his contact with St George is with the NRL to approve.

Wonder with David Furner joining our coaching ranks where does that leave Nathan Cayless (unemployed). Furner was a great player and experience in the coaching ranks so hope he can be an asset to WT.
Cayless is gone, shame really I thought he has done a good job this year.
 
The argument that the Hastings Brooks Doueihi combination is a winner is an admission that Brooks can't play half ( Also when Brooks got injured Madden filled the role just as capably ).

It's not that simple. It's an admission that Brooks isn't a million dollar marquee player but it's also an admission that Hastings and Doueihi aren't up to it as well. Hastings should get the least amount of grief because he is the best performer out of those three but Hastings is slow and he doesn't have a good long kicking game.

Doueihi is an awesome runner of the footy with a power game but his defense is inconsistent. He hits hard and makes some great tackles but teams run it at him because they know he also misses tackles all the time. Doueihi also makes more poor decisions than Brooks.

On the flip side there is a lot of upside with all three of those players. Brooks has speed and he can create out wide. Plus he has the best long kicking game out of the three of them. His defense is also decent but to be fair he still misses tackles he should make.

I'm pretty confident Sheenius thinks in a set up with Hastings in the middle and Doueihi and Brooks running it off him which is the best part of their games we can win some more games. The big catch to this is that you can't pay Brooks or Doueihi or Hastings like marquee talent. They also don't deserve top dollar salaries.
 
I said a couple of seasons ago that WT should spend a large chuck of their salary cap on quality forwards, a ½ and a fullback. The rest can be cheap "pathways" players on min wage.
I'm still wondering, is that the best way to go?
 
Back
Top