supercoach
Well-known member
I would take Clifford before Crossland who we have been linked with as Maddens replacementWhy not include Clifford in a deal to swap brooks... he is younger kicks goals and I like his kicking game...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would take Clifford before Crossland who we have been linked with as Maddens replacementWhy not include Clifford in a deal to swap brooks... he is younger kicks goals and I like his kicking game...
I know there's not alot of options but Clifford would not be great, he's still learning the game...Why not include Clifford in a deal to swap brooks... he is younger kicks goals and I like his kicking game...
And re signed Offa. I would think he would want to get done prior to Nov 1 the contracts of players he wants to keep. That way he goes to Nov 1 with a clear idea of what positions he needs and how much money he has.I am on board with the whole Sheen / Benji / Robbie coaching idea and hope it all works out.
But am I correct in saying the ONLY signing Sheen's has made is Naden ?? Papa and Api were done prior I believe.
With all this excitement around Sheen's / Benji and we are yet to sign a player and IMO is a massive concern.. I will sit back and trust the process but generally when a new coach is announced etc.. they makes signings pretty quickly as players want to be apart of the change. I thought Benji had some pull according to other players / commentators in the game.
So either they have a few lined up but are keeping it rather quite or we are praying we get lucky..
I would prefer Clifford over Brooks. Get it done tigers.Why not include Clifford in a deal to swap brooks... he is younger kicks goals and I like his kicking game...
Not a fan of Brooks but he’s a better player than CliffordI would prefer Clifford over Brooks. Get it done tigers.
Tannous is a hooker now.
@KingRobbie told us a while back and since returning from injury he's exclusively played hooker, either starting or from the bench.
So are all our current halves. Clifford would be no better or worse than what we have, but I reckon if you told him he was playing centre, lock or prop, he would play his best and not sook about it.I know there's not alot of options but Clifford would not be great, he's still learning the game...
Everyone here thinks Pace / Speed means running a hundred metres in 12 Seconds....
It Doesn't.
It's speed off the mark, Able to switch play on a dime...
Love or hate AD or JH.... that's not them.
Everyone here thinks Pace / Speed means running a hundred metres in 12 Seconds....
It Doesn't.
It's speed off the mark, Able to switch play on a dime...
Love or hate AD or JH.... that's not them.
I lost count of the amount of times Hastings was half way through his 2 steps to a kick and was hit... Dropping the ball and not getting even the kick away.
It wasn't a sometimes thing, It happened a few times...
That also comes with playing behind a well beaten pack
- But horses for courses... They're all playing behind the same pack.
Everyone is begging us to throw everything at Hastings...
How many 13's in the comp is he better than?
Even at 7, How many 7's in the comp is he better than? Certainly none in the top 8 I would think??
It's just another case of someone showing a little bit of something and being elevated by the fans (Certainly this forum) The reality is - All of our options are mid level at best...
And we probably should be aiming higher - For one of them at least.
AD can organise?
Since when?
What exactly has he ever organised - He can barely pass!!
Exactly - Big body that can take on the line....
Might need to do some weights "Learn to tackle" and play in the back row.
If he was coming through at the Roosters or Storm - He'd be there already....
Knights give us Klemmer, Frizzel & Clifford. We give them Brooks and a handful of magic beans. Works for me....Knights can't have Brooks. Especially under their bullshit terms..Stick to Magpie legend Tyson Gamble and young Clifford. Brooks has another year he's elite compared to those two. Having Sheens there, someone who really understands him with Benji as a back up support will return him to form. One more year for Luke I back him, knights can take a lap
He's a backrower who still thinks he's a half because he played there as a kid....
Like Matto, Anasta, Brown, Sutton, Sironen, Schuster... The list is endless.
If he's not careful, He'll spend half his career trying to hold onto a 6 jersey somewhere - And the other half (When it's too late) trying to learn his proper position.
Don't get me wrong, He can do a job there - But he won't reach any great heights there....
Could be a real rep player in the back row or lock - If he'd only learn to tackle.
AD could play any position....Yeah comparing him with those
Guys is a bit silly, a bit premature..
Saying he should play backrow
With the the same breath U said
He can't defend is equally silly.
For sure. Coming off the hecticAD could play any position....
Sky's the limit.
Trouble is he only wants to play 6 mateAD could play any position....
Sky's the limit.
Well to be fair brooks has the same speed as Dearden , just lacks alot of confidence and an organiser general like Townsend and maybe lost some youthful arrogance. AH is not a great organiser from what we saw and JH looks good but whow knows consistently...Deaden type speed would be ideal somewhere in the halves. Can be an attacking threat.