Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

That's how it was portrayed in the media at the time.
Eels low balled him upfront, Bulldogs didn't & put in a nice sweetener as well upfront.
He told the Eels, they then rushed back quickly with another offer and he signed with Bulldogs.
Eels stuffed up.

People need to remember Hookers don't get a huge price tag on them, we got Api for a steal considering the prices players are potentially getting 24 onwards.
I think Dogs got a good deal. 450 was way unders and is the parra way. Mahoneys strength was JMK's weakness, which was fast good ball from dummy half. Mahoneys hooker speed allows players like Moses to use their natural ability with some room. Add a rolling forward pack and itll make weak teams look like swiss cheese. Id value Mahoney 650k, now that we know there is a good cap increase, 700k.
 
Gould is quoted as saying he never underpays a player.
Seems to buy good faith in players and makes them want to be under him. Tigers and eels are always looking for that sneaky deal.
We do two things, undercut, or go way over.
Leb, I have another leb mate who says same thing about Moses.

So what you are saying is we are $200k/$250k above dogs per annum? And he still hasn’t signed with us?

If that’s correct we’re done.

LM &Munster 2.0
 
That isnt how I remember it.

I remenber there was a scandal that eels undercut him and offered him 400 or 450. Then came back at 500 whereas the dogs came in with a no BS up front offer. I distinctly recall journalists reporting that that why Mhoney was impressed, dogs went stright for the jugular.
Eels offer was 3 yrs at $450Dogs was 4 yrs at $650
Also Burton offered a upgraded 4 yr for $3.7m
 
Leb, I have another leb mate who says same thing about Moses.

So what you are saying is we are $200k/$250k above dogs per annum? And he still hasn’t signed with us?

If that’s correct we’re done.

LM &Munster 2.0
Honestly us not signing moses does not mean were done.
Cmon were tigers Fans. Clubs worst halves pairing Moses + Brooks! We damn well know this.

Were done because our rep is crap. Players see us as the next spoon.

Also, odd for WT to be compaired to Parra. I see Parra as having good players but having Money hungry players like Gutho, Moses and Matterson. Other then Doueihi and Nofo dont see the same at the WT.

Instead i see Brooks and a bunch of players getting stupid overs and long term contracts on low performance.

It took Brad Arthur 4 years + to rebuild Parra. Were in for the same ride.
 
Honestly us not signing moses does not mean were done.
Cmon were tigers Fans. Clubs worst halves pairing Moses + Brooks! We damn well know this.

Were done because our rep is crap. Players see us as the next spoon.

Also, odd for WT to be compaired to Parra. I see Parra as having good players but having Money hungry players like Gutho, Moses and Matterson. Other then Doueihi and Nofo dont see the same at the WT.

Instead i see Brooks and a bunch of players getting stupid overs and long term contracts on low performance.

It took Brad Arthur 4 years + to rebuild Parra. Were in for the same ride.
You just invalidated any right to an adult opinion by suggesting non-tacklers Douehi & Nofa are our "good players"!!
 
With 3rd Party it is probably more. Was speaking to someone high up at the Storm a few weeks back and the Bulldogs are using alot of 3rd Party deals to secure profile players as those deals provide multiple benefits now/future to some players.
I've heard the same from a good source, Laundy will buy a premiership. I was told the Dogs official offer for MM wasn't much more than the Eels but the extras will most likely be too good to refuse.
Also Corey Allen was paid out to go to the Roosters. Bet that doesn't appear on the salary cap.
 
Isn't he a WT fan? Wish he could have done that for us.
I've heard the same from a good source, Laundy will buy a premiership. I was told the Dogs official offer for MM wasn't much more than the Eels but the extras will most likely be too good to refuse.
Also Corey Allen was paid out to go to the Roosters. Bet that doesn't appear on the salary capIn
 

Staff online

Back
Top