Why do we keep trying to manufacture players ? It hasn't worked for the last 5 yrs .AD should be able to play lock if he can tackle better
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why do we keep trying to manufacture players ? It hasn't worked for the last 5 yrs .AD should be able to play lock if he can tackle better
AD runs well and would give us a option with a bomb. If you can pick him up in 2024 for 650k or 700k the he would be a good 13. In regards to AD's defence hoping Furner can work on that.Why do we keep trying to manufacture players ? It hasn't worked for the last 5 yrs .
Clearys kicking game is the prime example, Lui does most of the running, and setting up.In todays game just having a game controlling kick is enough to be worth 900k plus
I actually think he would be very damaging as an edge backrower as he likes to run and he is a big, powerful body with some ball skill. The question is whether he has the work ethic or tackling technique for the forwards.Hes big enough for the forwards...
Cleary's kicking is better, but not a lot better, and Lui does the running. Moses's game has both weapons. Also take into account the makeup of both sides, i doubt Cleary would be as effective in the Eels side.Moses's kicking game is nowhere near as good as Cleary's. Cleary is incredibly precise and consistent and smart in his kicking game. It is the best aspect of his play. Moses is good but is less consistent and threatening as a kicker. Cleary's ability to either turn the momentum of the game or provide unrelenting deep and accurate kicks is such a core part of what the Panthers do well.
I would not expect that from Moses if he came here and it's why I hesitate about trying to recruit him as a solution at halfback.
Love how people think backs can easily transition to the forward pack.Hes big enough for the forwards...
I agree with all of that. To sum it up, despite the fact that we have to pay overs to get any half of quality, the purported deal of 1.4 mil for 4/ 5 years is just plain bad business. Those dollars and length of deal are what you'd offer to one of the best players in the game (think Cleary, Munster, Turbo, etc) and there's no way Moses falls into that category. He's 28, a tempestuous character who shafted the club previously, and tends to be a running, broken field style half, not a true organiser.Taking Moses's history with the club out of the equation I still think this would be a terrible signing at that price and length of contract.
Yes, he was in a Grand Final but he was awful in that final series. The eels forwards led them to the grand final (that and the rails run, avoiding the likes of Penrith, Rabbitohs and Roosters in the other knock out stages). We've seen Moses is also a previous wooden spoon recipient so we know he equally cannot perform behind a bad pack.
All that said, I can accept he probably is probably an upgrade at 7, but at 1.4mil and with the comfort of a 5 year contract I don't see how anyone could possibly think he will perform to that value.
Maybe 3 years at 1mil, I wouldn't like it but I could understand.
Then factoring in his history at the club I can't see why anyone would be happy.
Your opinion of course but I heavily disagree….with everything.Cleary's kicking is better, but not a lot better, and Lui does the running. Moses's game has both weapons. Also take into account the makeup of both sides, i doubt Cleary would be as effective in the Eels side.
He doesn’t.I actually think he would be very damaging as an edge backrower as he likes to run and he is a big, powerful body with some ball skill. The question is whether he has the work ethic or tackling technique for the forwards.
Why do we keep trying to manufacture players ? It hasn't worked for the last 5 yrs .
agree with a lot of that, but moses broke his back in the first few minutes of that origin game. he's not in Cleary's class and I cant stand him for the way he left thoughYour opinion of course but I heavily disagree….with everything.
Cleary is a step higher in kicking ability.
Cleary is a damaging runner and good ball player.
Luai is a foil only as witnessed in the World Cup.
Cleary is an all round better player, and leader as detailed in the 2021 SOO series. With him present, NSW were a 35 point better team on average across games 1 and 2. Moses came in for game 3 and with the same side got beaten.
Luai is up there with Teddy and Munster as an attacking player. Look at the finals last year! Moses is a far better attacking player, and still with an excellent kicking game, though not as good as Cleary's. I am a Cleary fan, but i think Moses would be more valuable to us then Cleary with the side we have.Your opinion of course but I heavily disagree….with everything.
Cleary is a step higher in kicking ability.
Cleary is a damaging runner and good ball player.
Luai is a foil only as witnessed in the World Cup.
Cleary is an all round better player, and leader as detailed in the 2021 SOO series. With him present, NSW were a 35 point better team on average across games 1 and 2. Moses came in for game 3 and with the same side got beaten.
I may be biased against Luai as I think he is extremely lucky he came through the system he did. I’m convinced he is a genuine flat tracker.Luai is up there with Teddy and Munster as an attacking player. Look at the finals last year! Moses is a far better attacking player, and still with an excellent kicking game, though not as good as Cleary's. I am a Cleary fan, but i think Moses would be more valuable to us then Cleary with the side we have.
He's tall and lanky,but to think he will transform into a Steve Menzies is a long shot.I actually think he would be very damaging as an edge backrower as he likes to run and he is a big, powerful body with some ball skill. The question is whether he has the work ethic or tackling technique for the forwards.
the eels pack is the one pack that could compare to the Panthers last year (and beats probably every other pack). Eels had 3 middles play Origin, a NZ backrower and another NZ rep that swaps between middle and edge. Their other backrower was exceptional without achieving rep honours. They were probably one decent bench forward short of matching the Panthers.Can't compaire the forward packs.
Mate if you can get a look at the finals last year,do so. He terrorised the outside backs in those games. His footwork was unbelievable. I think he's a twit. but deadly with the ball in his hands.I may be biased against Luai as I think he is extremely lucky he came through the system he did. I’m convinced he is a genuine flat tracker.
For mine, Moses is a slight upgrade on Brooks. At 28 I wouldn’t offer him a comfy bed to lie in.
His footwork at the line is dangerous and he is deceptively quick. That’s it.Mate if you can get a look at the finals last year,do so. He terrorised the outside backs in those games. His footwork was unbelievable. I think he's a twit. but deadly with the ball in his hands.
Id rate him significantly better than Tucker seems to, but still well off being in the same class as Munster and Tedesco.Mate if you can get a look at the finals last year,do so. He terrorised the outside backs in those games. His footwork was unbelievable. I think he's a twit. but deadly with the ball in his hands.
Luai may be a shit bloke off the field but you can’t question his performances on it. He took Samoa to the World Cup final after people raved on about how Cleary made him look so good.I may be biased against Luai as I think he is extremely lucky he came through the system he did. I’m convinced he is a genuine flat tracker.
For mine, Moses is a slight upgrade on Brooks. At 28 I wouldn’t offer him a comfy bed to lie in.
the eels pack is the one pack that could compare to the Panthers last year (and beats probably every other pack). Eels had 3 middles play Origin, a NZ backrower and another NZ rep that swaps between middle and edge. Their other backrower was exceptional without achieving rep honours. They were probably one decent bench forward short of matching the Panthers.
We might be getting stitched up, if it's true I just can't see how he's worth 1.4 a year atm. We keep saying as a club we're maturing and no longer paying players based on potential yet we offer Moses 1.4 million a year for 5 years, considering he hasn't won a comp and only played in one origin game. It's also a 5 year deal, if it goes pear shaped it guarantees our cap is stuffed for 5 years. If it's true I hope it works but it's a massive gamble, and to be honest he is being paid massive overs.Dogs forum say Tigers deal done for Moses at 5 years for 7M so 1.4per year if true.
IF and a big IF 5 years what is everyone thoughts?
I was happy with the 4 years but if the extra year is needed to make it happen, I say yes. It makes us a top 8 team for which he will help bigtime and considering the salary cap will rise in that time as well.. Could all be smoke as well but nice to dream Even if not true the club has had an excellent off season considering we were wooden spooners.