Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Josh Hodgson looked terrible today.

A bit of bad service to Moses and it might help make his mind up next week
Agree but he’s in that situation of returning from a longer term injury. Will improve with fitness, a bit like Talau. They need time on the field.
I’ve tried to stop thinking about Moses, what will be, will be.
 
Not true at all.
The structures are the blueprint for how we defend, what shape to use, who makes the calls, line speed levels, understanding which shoulder to use in each instance, A+B defender responsibilities, wrestling etc….
What I saw the other night was individual players running out of the line, chasing the ball runner across field and not trusting the men either side of them.
Irrespective of the talent difference, we had no shape and very poor communication. I would be surprised if our best 17 had these structures when that lot the other night didn’t, considering they have all been training together for months.
Expect the Raiders to get their bonus points win, lose or draw.
Tucker - that is exactly my take on what I watched also. I just want our teams to defend with intent and structure and generally just working hard as a team. That has not happened for a very long time.
 
It’s funny how many people claim “it’s just a trial” when we lose.
The Bunnies and Saints use their trial to decide the yearly Charity Shield winner.
The World Cup Challenge is a part of this years trials
The NRL has dedicated prize money to the team who performs the best in this years trials.
Fox Sports are broadcasting every trial live.
It’s old fashioned thinking to state that these games mean nothing and it is loser mentality.
I would have said the same had by some miracle had that side won

But maybe we should have picked a better side .....lets approach the Roosters about treating the Federation Cup game as a trial each season

My point still is this look at the side we picked .....we weren't obviously concerned about winning ...were we ??
 
Obviously we weren’t and that’s depressing.
The top clubs attempt to win every contest they are in.
We don't have a 14 million cap ...we have strengthened the side but we still lack depth ...proof ...Thursday night

Look at the back up 6/7 for Warriors ...Metcalfe carved us up in 2021 in Rocky and TMM is a good quality 6 ...we would empty our shorts if they were our back ups ...wouldn't we ....I reckon there back up 1 outplayed Bula as well
 
We don't have a 14 million cap ...we have strengthened the side but we still lack depth ...proof ...Thursday night

Look at the back up 6/7 for Warriors ...Metcalfe carved us up in 2021 in Rocky and TMM is a good quality 6 ...we would empty our shorts if they were our back ups ...wouldn't we ....I reckon there back up 1 outplayed Bula as well
Yeah well whose fault is that? We’ve had no recruitment strategy for years.
Lately we seem to have enacted some sort of plan, but our top 30 is a house of cards. The bottom 10 or so of our top 30 are no good to us this year.
I put together a thread on our positional depth a few weeks back and it was fairly glaring. More so now.
 
Obviously we weren’t and that’s depressing.
The top clubs attempt to win every contest they are in.
Sure. And we select a better team in a trial, one of them gets a season-ending injury and you see if we should be trying to win every game.

We should be trying to win every game that means something.
 
Tucker - that is exactly my take on what I watched also. I just want our teams to defend with intent and structure and generally just working hard as
Not true at all.
The structures are the blueprint for how we defend, what shape to use, who makes the calls, line speed levels, understanding which shoulder to use in each instance, A+B defender responsibilities, wrestling etc….
What I saw the other night was individual players running out of the line, chasing the ball runner across field and not trusting the men either side of them.
Irrespective of the talent difference, we had no shape and very poor communication. I would be surprised if our best 17 had these structures when that lot the other night didn’t, considering they have all been training together for months.
Expect the Raiders to get their bonus points win, lose or draw.
It was a trial, with mostly young guys wanting to impress thinking they need to stand out - hence defenders running out of the line, no shape with the ball. Clearly nervous teens trying to look good playing against a better team.

We were never trying to win, it was about putting those young guys into an occasion they have never had before so if they are called up later in the year they will be less overcome by the sense of occasion because they have played at a game in a big stadium, against some stars with a few people in the crowd before.
 
It was a trial, with mostly young guys wanting to impress thinking they need to stand out - hence defenders running out of the line, no shape with the ball. Clearly nervous teens trying to look good playing against a better team.

We were never trying to win, it was about putting those young guys into an occasion they have never had before so if they are called up later in the year they will be less overcome by the sense of occasion because they have played at a game in a big stadium, against some stars with a few people in the crowd before.
That makes no sense. When they get called up, they will be playing alongside our best players who will direct them. If we wanted to see how they would go, we should have sent some of our leaders with them. That way we could judge how they take instruction in the heat of battle, under game conditions. Whether they can implement what they have learned all off season under high stress and fatigue is vital intel.
As it was, they got nothing out of that trial.
 
And of course posters on this forum have input into the Club's recruitment. That's recruitment 101.

No surprise you’d make one of your usual deflection attempts considering you were one of the biggest opponents of signing Hynes.

Just a few examples of your many dumb tales about Hynes that we can add to your growing pile. Try to deflect and lie your way out of these:


“Laurie is a better fullback than Hynes.
Doueihi is a better centre and 5/8 than Hynes.
Both the above players don't have Papenhuyzen, JAC, Munster, Hughes, Smith and Grant in their team”


“He's no speedster. You want us to have the slowest halves combination in the NRL?”

Plenty more where they came from.You really have NFI about identifying talent, do you?
 
Back
Top