aturkey
Well-known member
Every person one in this sub and in general who have defended brooks over the years, this is because of you. You contributed to this. I hope you enjoy watching this loser player cost us game after game.
Luke Brooks #167
- Thread starter rihannafan1
- Start date
Tom Shines
Well-known member
where are they today?
Tom Shines
Well-known member
aturkey
Well-known member
I'm not sure but they should probably be in some padded room
aturkey
Well-known member
2 tries were scored down his edge, both he could have contributed to stopping if he had any sense in defence. He's a dead play majority of time he gets the ball. He bombed that last opportunity. He is terrible.
earl
Well-known member
Watch you talking about Willis ?
Hoe many tries have we scored over the past couple of weeks without Brooks being heavily involved. He is probably heavily involved in 80% of the tries we score.
I mean in our team he does those things basically better than anyone other than Api.
Terrible beyond belief. He’s not as good as his supporters/defenders believe he is.
earl
Well-known member
1st try. Brooks with the beautiful pass to To'a to create the try.
2nd try. All Api.
3rd try. Brooks to To'a. To'a did the work but Brooks gave him good ball.
So Brooks contributed to two out of 3 tries and one was a beautiful pass on the side he typically doesn't throw the ball.
I checked the highlights because I didn't see the game the same way you did and I didn't think what you said made any sense.
Last edited:
ElleryHanley
Well-known member
ElleryHanley
Well-known member
2021.
So he more or less done SFA for our million dollar man .once again when the game is on line he goes missing .but his record speaks for it self .and I will put up with work colleagues saying "why do yous still have brooks "
aturkey
Well-known member
He is not good. Full stop. His defenders are delusional.
17 losses in a row for Brooks.
Forwards were mostly good again, halves just can’t capitalise on good ball opportunity.
With 58% of the ball we did nowhere near enough.
And blaming the half on a minimum wage is just silly.
Forwards were mostly good again, halves just can’t capitalise on good ball opportunity.
With 58% of the ball we did nowhere near enough.
And blaming the half on a minimum wage is just silly.
Tiger_Fanatic3
Well-known member
Truly believe things would’ve worked out very differently for the club and for Brooks if WT did the same as the Roosters did with Walker, at any point over the last decade.
This is what the club really needs to do. This below is a perfect example.
This is what the club really needs to do. This below is a perfect example.
Against the Cowboys in Townsville in 2021. The 2 wins last year he was apart of he was 6.
Love_the_WestsTigers
Well-known member
Why, once again, we are trying to blame a loss on ONE player ??
Had we won the game no one would have said rubbish about him. Or maybe I’m wrong and people still would.
We as a team are not getting results, so blame players who make equal share of errors in each game, not just one bloke.
Had we won the game no one would have said rubbish about him. Or maybe I’m wrong and people still would.
We as a team are not getting results, so blame players who make equal share of errors in each game, not just one bloke.
Both our halves messed up tbh but yeah both Brooks and Wakeham did bad. We need a whole new halves pairing.
king_sirro
Well-known member
That dropped ball hurt. He just had to catch that.
Staff online
-
DempsModerator