Yet Brooks is the reason why we lost due to dropping a simple pass. He’s not the only one that made errors, but he made the most costly one. Been doing it for years and today was just another example.
Luke Brooks #167
- Thread starter rihannafan1
- Start date
Winston Churchill
Well-known member
This aged well
The Fresh Oil
Well-known member
I don’t think you understand how percentages work.
Dennisspicer1
Well-known member
Are you nuts.
Its just the tipping point, offers nothing else. Has a chance to offer something and drops the simplest of catches.
hobbo1
Well-known member
Brooks was born concussed
Piss him off
Piss him off
Winston Churchill
Well-known member
His defenders are displaying attention seeking behaviours. Its not delusional its deliberate for attention, they know what they are doing and they are filling up sock after sock watching the replies and attention they are getting. Best to ignore. Obvious is obvious.
Eternal Tiger
Well-known member
What's re-signing him then? Because you know they have and are too scared to announce it.
True I get the frustration there.
You can see why he’s hated by Tigers fans.
The Fresh Oil
Well-known member
I’m starting to think the same thing. At first I thought they were just brain dead / family friends but now I’m starting to think they get some sick sexual release from being brooks trolls. It’s worrying that we have this type of behavior on our forum.
If you took the field position stats of our match and ran an analysis over the last 10 years of matches where there was a similar domination, I bet the average score of the matches would be something like 36 - 12 for the team with dominant field position.
We've lost dominating field position multiple times now this year. Yes our backs and forwards may make the occasional untimely error, but they're doing 90% of their job. It falls on the halves. Wakeham obviously isn't good enough, but we didn't sign him as a full-time first grader. He's a minimum wager who can competently fill in when needed. Brooks is on 1 million+ a year. Of course the blame is going to go to him firstly and foremost. He's being paid like a superstar, he's delivering like a reserve grader.
We've lost dominating field position multiple times now this year. Yes our backs and forwards may make the occasional untimely error, but they're doing 90% of their job. It falls on the halves. Wakeham obviously isn't good enough, but we didn't sign him as a full-time first grader. He's a minimum wager who can competently fill in when needed. Brooks is on 1 million+ a year. Of course the blame is going to go to him firstly and foremost. He's being paid like a superstar, he's delivering like a reserve grader.
Mighty Mouse
Well-known member
Fact of the matter is that regardless of the drop by brooks at the end in very wet conditions, he still had ample opportunity to exploit the fantastic field position and base provided by the forwards which he couldn’t do. It’s the same old story, end of, not good enough. A good halfback would be calling for the ball in attacking positions and organising his outside men. This isn’t rocket science, he has poor footy IQ and always has.
Eternal Tiger
Well-known member
Even the satire is boring now.
hobbo1
Well-known member
One went missing and the other sock 🧦 changed his user name 🤣
Winston Churchill
Well-known member
He also doesnt understand a half back should be involved in 80%+ of tries we score, he mentions that like its an amazing stat for Brooks and not the sole reason a half back is on the field!!, also 0 x 0 is still zero. The amount of tries in total he has been involved with is beyond piss weak. He conveniently leave out that stat doesn't he.
Eternal Tiger
Well-known member
It is the 4th or 5th game this year where we've had over 55% of the ball. If your 7 can't win you those games, let alone a solitary one, hes incompetent.
He is on $1m a year, thats why he's criticised.
Staff online
-
Suzie-QModerator