You're wrong.
He needs to know what's going on across the organisation, yes sure, agreed. But he is NOT part of teh football department, he has no insights into teh type of players we do or don't want. His only part in recruitment is signing the contract, and potentially helping source Third party deals. That's it. Neither Pascoe or Lee should ever be present at a standard recruitment meeting.
Does the head coach not outline the vision of the organisation? Occasionally, particularly for high profile players, there may occasionally be a need to get the band together as a show of force and answer any additional questions. But in reality both these two have been embarrassed almost every single time they've done ANYTHING footy related! Pascoe would get the low down across department in a meeting with department heads, he should not be attending meetings that don't concern him, that's micromanagement, and a turn off for prospective employees
I see what you’re saying but knowing cash needed & what is at our disposal (both directly and indirectly - 3rd party) becomes a central talking point for key big names to potentially switch. Fulton wouldn’t organize any of the 3rd party/sponsorship offerings.
Reality is people are jumping up and down without any idea about anything tbh.
The statement you quoted isn’t any more wrong than your own.
Maybe it was asked to have our key head honcho’s attend to suggest if you raise xyz amounts then we can talk players moving across.
Maybe it was talking directly a set player
Maybe it was to discuss what was needed to get a quality fedora
Maybe they wanted styling advice from Pascoe
No one knows anything and are jumping to a range of assumptions.