Luke Brooks #167

Blacknwhite said:
You would have to be extremely delusional, to the point of insanity, to argue against the fact that we have had little trouble getting into attacking quarter of the park with high consistency, yet failed to convert the field position to points.

Our, by your definition lesser roster, has more often than not, dominated other (again more highly touted in your eyes) rosters as far as field position, yet lacked the direction and craftsmanship to matriculate it into points. I suppose in essence I agree with you, their rosters are better, but not across the park, but only 2 positions. Stud halves...
Click to expand...

I'm not.... And it's not just my eyes... Most top 8 teams have more than 2 Origin Players...
We don't.

You'd also be delusional (Or just stupid beyond measure) to blame 100% of the lack of points converted solely on the halves...
I've seen Bateman bomb tries that probably win us games - I've seen upteen outside backs make stupid errors and cost us possession...
To the point - I'd almost argue that our halves own around 25% of our failings in the red zone...
Even then I'm being generous.
 
batboy said:
Losing Brooks would take us 3-4 years just to get back to being the Wests Tigers of 2017.
NUTS!!
Click to expand...

I agree (with some provisos) but we cannot be held to ransom anymore. We need to realize that retention is really important. Brooks could come back and ask for a small increase or something. If he wants to get maximum dollars let him go.

The provisos about Brooks leaving are we are currently dead last so it's hard to go backwards, Brooks has had calf and hamstring injuries which could mean he isn't so robust anymore and sometimes you get lucky with development players.

I want to keep him but we need to build a better squad not retain Brooks at all costs.
 
Blacknwhite said:
Stud halves...
Click to expand...

Sorry but this is a silly argument. It's sort of correct but getting stud halves is extremely difficult and Brooks would be fine as a secondary play maker. He'd be one of the best in the comp.

The issue isn't just the halves. The issue is the lack of stud players. We don't have a single game breaker now. Some teams have multiple game breakers.
 
earl said:
I agree (with some provisos) but we cannot be held to ransom anymore. We need to realize that retention is really important. Brooks could come back and ask for a small increase or something. If he wants to get maximum dollars let him go.

The provisos about Brooks leaving are we are currently dead last so it's hard to go backwards, Brooks has had calf and hamstring injuries which could mean he isn't so robust anymore and sometimes you get lucky with development players.

I want to keep him but we need to build a better squad not retain Brooks at all costs.
Click to expand...
It's this short sightedness that plagues us....
Being dead last isn't as far back as we can go.

Starting next year without any recognised halves and not winning games - Will stunt the development of the young blokes, Waste the last legs of blokes like Klem and Api - Make none of the next crop want to stick around.... Coming last with some upside coming through, Is very different to coming last with nothing to look forward to.

Also, Listen to any of the big 3 that left - You'll hear them all say that the clubs treatment of Farah was one of the reasons they moved on....
Now, I don't believe that to be true...
But if it's noticed, It's spoken about - And not just within the players at our club.
 
earl said:
I agree (with some provisos) but we cannot be held to ransom anymore. We need to realize that retention is really important. Brooks could come back and ask for a small increase or something. If he wants to get maximum dollars let him go.

The provisos about Brooks leaving are we are currently dead last so it's hard to go backwards, Brooks has had calf and hamstring injuries which could mean he isn't so robust anymore and sometimes you get lucky with development players.

I want to keep him but we need to build a better squad not retain Brooks at all costs.
Click to expand...
what is held to ransom though ?
Brooks for 700k or Lachlan Lam for 600k ? Brooks any day of the week

if I was Brooks I would look at Penrith as a 9 off the bench as the best option and a good half backup for origin at the right price it would be an astute buy for panthers
 
Jedi_Tiger said:
meanwhile we are getting Adam clune at 7 lol
Click to expand...
I've stated before we don't know what a different set of halves will do behind the forward pack we have .as for Luke I wish him the best in Nq. Don't think they will win the come tho .there outside backs are pretty average
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
loklok said:
I've stated before we don't know what a different set of halves will do behind the forward pack we have .as for Luke I wish him the best in Nq. Don't think they will win the come tho .there outside backs are pretty average
Click to expand...

When we've got 2 starting Origin OB's in the team - I'd like to see you call them 'average'
 
Bones said:
Looks like the Cowboys are not interested today. It almost seems like people are making this stuff up…
Click to expand...

It would be glorious if Brook’s manager advised him to reject the low ball offer, makes up some story about NQ ( looking at the costs of their current halves, makes no sense) but NQ come out and go nah bro. Not us.

Knowing wests this will be the one time they WONT put a clock on the offer before pulling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 476 (members: 3, guests: 473)
Back
Top