Tom Shines
Well-known member
Bit slow on the edit
Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion
- Thread starter MacDougall
- Start date
Bit slow on the edit
supercoach
Well-known member
Ok the Dogs have gone out and got themselves a handful of basic level NRL players with experience and people are dismissing them. What they are doing is building really solid depth something that has killed us over the past few years. We have a top 17 player go down and we have nothing to replace them with, the cupboard are bare at present.
Maybe if the pathways delivers in a year or two things might change, but I would be more than happy if a couple of the Dogs signings had come our way
Maybe if the pathways delivers in a year or two things might change, but I would be more than happy if a couple of the Dogs signings had come our way
Tucker
Well-known member
I don’t know why people can’t see this. Good post.
the bulldogs are absolutely feeling the pressure dismal signings over the last few days, gould about to launch a play at mitch pearce
sullivan met with the club today as reported, still abit to play out
brodie croft was offered 450k by the club for 2 seasons or around that mark, camp was expecting 650+
wakeham has a few bites from super league
sullivan met with the club today as reported, still abit to play out
brodie croft was offered 450k by the club for 2 seasons or around that mark, camp was expecting 650+
wakeham has a few bites from super league
any whispers about the Sezer hold up
Tom Shines
Well-known member
they are still signing players though … unlike us
Given everyone ends up with the same number the timing of when they sign means absolutely nothing
Plus we have 23 players signed for next year and they have 22 - so actually no they are not
Tom Shines
Well-known member
Seriously? you really want to compare the Dogs signings to ours?
Sully
Well-known member
Looks like Lomax staying at the Dragons also which is a shame
Tom Shines
Well-known member
$800k … they can have him
Betterdays22
Well-known member
Totally depends on the size and length of these contracts, and how much they will have to pitch in for the players they have asked to move on.
Tom Shines
Well-known member
Bit quiet here tonight..
We haven’t signed anyone?
We haven’t signed anyone?
No idea
tony soprano
Well-known member
Yeh, seen him play a couple of times this season in SG.
Think he is in year 12 school. Hard to tell mate he is a class above at school boys, like a lot of the school age boys that are in WT pathways.
Would not be radical to say he is the best school boy coming through. Depends how his body develops over the next 6 months.
WT haven't rushed him in to flegg like some of the other guys. The other guys might be a year older than him just out of school this year. WT allowing him to playout all the school boy stuff, plus made the Australian team.
He will see first grade 2024 or 2025 if injury free for sure.
He looks like a wizard at 6 playing school boys but didn't stand out as much this season in SG ball this season at 6, which he must of played a year younger than most to the team.
I've nothing against any of the dogs recruits and think at the right price they all add value to a roster. I just don't think any of them warrant the "how can they afford..." or "how do they attract..." posts that have been flooding this thread.
They can afford and attract them because they are fringe guys with genuine claims at a permanent first grade spot at the Dogs. I don't think any of them (besides Sexton) would be likely starters here.
Eternal Tiger
Well-known member
Already signed Dom Young and Spencer Leniu too.
Willie Mason mentioned it on his podcast..
He was slamming it too, saying its ridiculous.
Never heard it said prior to 2023.
Very cringe imo