WT Ownership, The Board & Senior Management - MEGA Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can't imagine the club's owners, the Holman Barnes Group, going to this much trouble if they have no intention of following up on any of its recommendations which, given the shambolic way the joint has been run for years, are unlikely to be kind to our present administration.
 
Ok...so if the people that make the decisions knowing full well that Balmain only owns a miniscule part of our club and therefore should only be entitled to a miniscule say in what happens in the near future, decide that our club would be better off without Balmain and unwanted appendages like back door benny, are you prepared to support that?
That could never be the case.
The more control Wests have secured, the worse the club has been.
 
If that is the recommendations from the review then so be it. I am not fighting for the return of Balmain.
I've flagged this post cochise, so we'll see what your attitude is in the future.
I just wish I had flagged the post where you admitted you DO tend to give 'old Magpies' a hard time.
This ends my discussion on this matter for at least the time being.
 
I've flagged this post cochise, so we'll see what your attitude is in the future.
I just wish I had flagged the post where you admitted you DO tend to give 'old Magpies' a hard time.
This ends my discussion on this matter for at least the time being.
Sweet mate, you do you.

I am not on some old Magpies witch hunt here. In fact we have had excellent communications with the Holman Barnes Group throughout this process. This has zero to do with Balmain and the Magpies, this is about making Wests Tigers successful.

For some reason you seem to have your feather ruffled here. Maybe time to let old grudges go for your own health.
 
This place is weird. Wests completely control WT and yet I never see old Balmain fans bitching about Wests, its always a handful of old Magpies bitching and moaning.
I doubt the majority of Holman Barnes directors have ever had anything to do with wests magpies.We have been gone for over 20 years
 
I doubt the majority of Holman Barnes directors have ever had anything to do with wests magpies.We have been gone for over 20 years

Well they appoint 4 of the 7 board members of WSDRLFC so they control Magpies, and 3 of WSDRLFC board members are HB board members but somehow probably Balmains fault.
 
I've flagged this post cochise, so we'll see what your attitude is in the future.
I just wish I had flagged the post where you admitted you DO tend to give 'old Magpies' a hard time.
This ends my discussion on this matter for at least the time being.
I would like to know what you and @ancient_magpie are so concerned about?

This club has just won back to back spoons and is looking down the barrel of another, on the back of not playing finals football for over a decade. Off the field we lurch from one stuff up to another.

I think it is important it is important to find the causes of the position the club finds itself in and solutions to rectify it.

I would expect any organisation with a decade of failure to investigate the reason for that failure.
 
I've flagged this post cochise, so we'll see what your attitude is in the future.
I just wish I had flagged the post where you admitted you DO tend to give 'old Magpies' a hard time.
This ends my discussion on this matter for at least the time being.
I don’t understand what your issue is. The whole time @cochise has not once called for the return of Balmain nor Magpies. Both clubs are now merged and the key of this review is to help make the Wests Tigers successful, not bring either club back into first grade. Besides our whole board of directors besides Danny and Lee are either Magpies fans, or involved with the Magpies prior to the merge or both. Maybe it’s time the board was not people who were associated with either club?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top