I don't know what point you're trying to make, though. You said Galvin had to play because there were no options. This isn't true: the expected starting halves were Sezer and Sullivan going into pre-season, and Galvin won his place on merit. If what you're trying to say is that players become the best available option sooner in bad teams than they do in good ones, I mean, yeah - great analysis. What you definitively can't say is what you started with, ie that Galvin had to play because there was no-one else available. I think we're done here. I certainly am.