Magic .i think this thread is about uniting to force the review into place,chit chat on who said she said he said is over on another channel,
OFFICIAL Wests Tigers Unite: Call to Arms
- Thread starter Demps
- Start date
- Status
happy_tiger
Well-known member
Petition signed .....bring it on HBG
What ? It was an outcome of the review . Read the Chammas article . It’s been mentioned by Pascoe in his exit podcast he made with someone , it’s been mentioned by others involved in the club as an issue . …
What are you even arguing ? Names and dates ? Why for what reason ?
The wests tigers board has/ had been a shit show for years . What do you actually think needs to happen for that generalisation to have come to light ?
This whole “I want facts “ its just a shit way to argue . It’s extremely defensive and implys guilt IMO .
If ever I hear someone say “prove it “ I hear “ yea I did it but you can’t do anything about it “ .
The facts we out there , but I’m not going reference them at 1115 on a Saturday night , I just don’t care enough .
But it doesn’t mean I’m wrong .
Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
Well I agree most aspects of the review will bring positive changes especially Richardson etc.
But it has created division and successfully divided the HBG board unfortunately and ultimately it is an attack on the ownership of the club based on subjective opinion.
Now it is morphing as an attack on WA seemingly over the members heads.
Not especially keen on the debenture system however it has presided over success for WA and it may lead to destabilisation of the group as some here have called for.
Not really a fan of Burgess but he has been a director of HBG for 20 years...a successful period. Hard to be useless and survive in a directorship for that long whilst club is growing.
hammertime
Well-known member
The petiton is tracking well. Good traction so far, but still a way to go.
In the same 20 years HBG have been successful the wests tigers have been a joke .
The review was called for , and anyone with a brain saw it as the club needed a reset . The club being wests tigers .
If he’d had stepped away and gone back to HBG , he would be spoken about in a kind light . No he politicked and got himself back on the WT board . Now the knives are out because of his performance as a WT board member . It has very little to do with HBG .
Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
Not a good reply.
I like most outcomes from the review however I find it hard to believe that Burgess obstructed ....Barry, Gilbert, Wayde, Danny, Dorahy, Go etc etc.
They obstructed the football department . They all did ? It’s litterally what’s been a major issue here . The meddling of the board . Your ability to make it one or the other is outstanding . The board as it stood was the issue , and as such nearly all had to go . I understand why Stapleton couldn’t because he had the Balmain seat .
A reset was in order . But we got the exact opposite ? Why ? What possible reason could a failed Muso have to think he knew more than anyone else and would offer the best governance for wests tigers .. especially with all the recent failure every single other person fell on their sword . Not Burgo…
Totally agree ,but there is 3 threads + going on about the in justices n slander between the groom n the bride ,mate i can twist a thread off track at a whim,plenty of places to discuss politices of it all,please dont poison this thread,it could be the only chance this club gets to face its self and be dragged into the next what ever
hammertime
Well-known member
At Merlot has correctly called out. Lets keep this about the petition. There is the other thread for debate
Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
Burgess doesn't have to be there.. He currently represents HBG.....they can field a representative surely right.. Ironic that seems things are okay board wise with him there now and only 4 of them.
It was really only Pascoe and Lee.
But in essence ever since day 1 of Wests majority ownership there seems constant bagging of nearly every Wests affiliated member.
The total dissolution of the board had to occur given the high standing and sponsorship links of certain people for plausible deniability.
Last edited:
What ? You’re going to need to elaborate as that reads like conspiracy nonsense .
And yep he doesn’t have to .. but he is ! And that’s the point . He shouldn’t be !
Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
Huh,
Don't care if he's there or not.
Gunna be funny if he is and it’s still an interim board and things are going okay right.
Better be quick, the window is closing.
Last edited:
surely you jest,The 2 remaining board members,Burgess n Ramero put the other 3,not sure where you get 4 participating board members from,on trumped up charges to rid them of any free thinking,shoot me down ,feel free ,im just numb to all the lies
It’s only coming across that way because the guys holding the club back from implementing what they agreed needed to be done are dyed in the wool Magpie dinosaurs clinging on to power any way they can.
You don’t really believe they have the best interests of the WestsTigers at heart do you?
Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
Was talking about 4 current WT board members.
who would they be ,educate me,to my knowledge there is only 2 blocking progress
Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
Well as I said in my 1st post this evening I feel some of their concerns re the review are valid.......however it's too late for changes there....
They should proceed to administer the changes and look to imput their perspective on things later.
As for dyed in the wool Magpies Well they sure showed it by signing the renewal of the Wests Tigers licence for 10 years......funny way to be dyed in the wool Magpies.
Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
No was talking about baz, burgess, Danny and Montgomery currently the WT board.
And club is seemingly on way up.
It's all about Richardson re football operations really....what I meant.
Tigerdazz2
Well-known member
Any ex Western Suburbs Magpie or ex Balmain Tigers supporters who don't fully embrace the joint venture 25 years after its inception are totally ignorant of or completely dismissive of the whole generation of supporters who have grown up supporting only the Wests Tigers who have none of the pre merger biases nor baggage burdening them.
These "first generation" Wests Tigers supporters are having kids of their own now, with many having very young and/or yet to be born Wests Tigers fans, products of this very first generation of Wests Tigers supporters.
Any divisiveness from the old brigade is disrespectful, unproductive and needs to be called out and stopped at ALL levels, by and from the Board & CEO, to the Football Club to the members & the fans.
These "first generation" Wests Tigers supporters are having kids of their own now, with many having very young and/or yet to be born Wests Tigers fans, products of this very first generation of Wests Tigers supporters.
Any divisiveness from the old brigade is disrespectful, unproductive and needs to be called out and stopped at ALL levels, by and from the Board & CEO, to the Football Club to the members & the fans.
- Status
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion- Latest: Rock Hopper Steve
-