Taking a wrecking ball to the club! (Recent Media Reports)

Status
Not open for further replies.
hammertime said:
If you're argument is that the linked in data is faked, then geez man... that's stretching.

... and more so that's not how linkedin works. Firms do not tag you. Not sure what you're talking about there.

Where do you personally see the gap? No one ever fits the remit 100%
Click to expand...
Geeze mate? where did I say the Linked in data was faked?
You can't find the data you're looking for even after you said "it's a simple google search" 😂 But you did note (and thank you for stating the obvious) "it's a much better resume than yours. 🤣
 
diedpretty said:
It's so funny watching the " we are Wests Tigers " crowd suddenly changing tune and calling for a buyout and become Balmain. HYPOCRITES.
Click to expand...
Spot on diedpretty 👍 It really doesn't matter to the olde Balmain followers as they have Tigers to follow wether it's Balmain Tigers or Wests Tigers.
So I reckon there could be something more on their minds, and I wonder what that could be?🤔
 
BZN said:
Spot on diedpretty 👍 It really doesn't matter to the olde Balmain followers as they have Tigers to follow wether it's Balmain Tigers or Wests Tigers.
So I reckon there could be something more on their minds, and I wonder what that could be?🤔
Click to expand...

You're making things up. So is he, the facts are you're
going into bat 4 the same people that brought you
the Pascoe & Hagipantelis years. This isn't a balmain
or magpies thing, only so many different ways
different people can highlight that to you. This is
all driven by WT's failure. We want 2 win on & off
the field with legit partners/ premierships that's it...
 
diedpretty said:
You need to go back and re read a few of the posts. Just on the name change bullshit - there is no evidence whatsoever that this was actually suggested by HBG. All Andrechios said was he had a " fear" that this is what they want and Chammas jumped on it. Neither Chammas or Andrechios have put forward any evidence to support the claim. Nor have they provided any detail as to how they would do it given that the licence is under the name of Wests Tigers. But as usual half the forum go off their nut over some clickbait.
Click to expand...
And I wonder if there is one or two people that do encourage them to go off their nut whenever this stuff comes up?
But surely it couldn't be him and him?🤔
I wouldn't believe it if anyone told me that 🥲.
 
Kaito said:
You're making things up. So is he, the facts are you're
going into bat 4 the same people that brought you
the Pascoe & Hagipantelis years. This isn't a balmain
or magpies thing, only so many different ways
different people can highlight that to you. This is
all driven by WT's failure. We want 2 win on & off
the field with legit partners/ premierships that's it...
Click to expand...
Their are a few Balmain dinosaurs on here just as there are Magpies dinosaurs and to suggest a few of them didn't call for a buyout and name change is false.
 
twentyforty said:
Geeze mate? where did I say the Linked in data was faked?
You can't find the data you're looking for even after you said "it's a simple google search" 😂 But you did note (and thank you for stating the obvious) "it's a much better resume than yours. 🤣
Click to expand...
You said "people can put anything on linkedin"? and then refered to an example of someone adding fake data on you. Im not sure how else i could have read it?

I'm not sure what you mean by the 2nd part either. I found his profile easily, suggest you can do the same.
 
diedpretty said:
Andrechios text was non committal fluff as well. He has a " fear" that they want to change the name. How about he actually produces some evidence or provides details of how they are going to do do it.
Click to expand...
Doesn't need to be details on how they are going to do it. If someone doesn't support wests tigers as an entity, then they shouldn't be in power for wests tigers.

Rick has provided verbal evidence now of 3 occasions from dennis. SMH has also reported it. What do you want more, for people to testify with a hand on the bible?

Ill also add, if Danny stapleton was doing the same, I'd advocate for him to be removed. It's a core part of our problem. Such a God damn waste of time and energy to constantly talk about magpies or balmain.
 
diedpretty said:
It's so funny watching the " we are Wests Tigers " crowd suddenly changing tune and calling for a buyout and become Balmain. HYPOCRITES.
Click to expand...
WHERE?? Putting forward an argument for private ownership is not advocating balmain. Unless i missed something. Can you quote what you're talking about??
 
It's as plain as a day that some will defend the right to maintain control regardless of the crap show that supporters have had to endure under the current administration who have had plenty of time to get it right and without the review - the first step to addressing the failure of a club unable to play finals for the past 13 seasons - would still be listening to the spin by LH and Pascoe.
How can you possibly seriously say you are WTs supporter and not demand better?
 
BZN said:
Spot on diedpretty 👍 It really doesn't matter to the olde Balmain followers as they have Tigers to follow wether it's Balmain Tigers or Wests Tigers.
So I reckon there could be something more on their minds, and I wonder what that could be?🤔
Click to expand...

you are just stirring shit now …

haven’t you got something better to do ?

I think you should follow your life dream and go and start up the West Sydney Bushrangers team
 
Last edited:
twentyforty said:
I think back a few years when only a couple of posters believed the ownership structure and consequential management behaviour would have an effect on the teams performance.
Now after 3 spoons and constant reminders of the circus it’s the posters themselves who are infected with the culture.
This board is determined to deliver us a 4th spoon.
We need to storm the castle!
We need to unite in the fight to save WT.
We need to blow our bagpipes and show our stripes.
At the next AGM.
Click to expand...
Yuh know, I reckon with so much un-necessary anti-Magpies sentiment shown on the WESTS Tigers Forum [which Imo really isn't a Wests Tigers Forum, it's a Balmain Tigers Forum] this could be a perfect example of how the Balmain people on the WT board behave, causing never ending disharmony and disruption which doesn't allow the board to really get on with things.
But in spite of that I feel the board has performed pretty well in getting the services of Richo along with the several new players, plus getting upgrades to C.S.S. and Leichhardt Oval.
I reckon any reasonable, fair and unbiased thinker would have to agree the board has done pretty well.
 
BZN said:
Yuh know, I reckon with so much un-necessary anti-Magpies sentiment shown on the WESTS Tigers Forum [which Imo really isn't a Wests Tigers Forum, it's a Balmain Tigers Forum] this could be a perfect example of how the Balmain people on the WT board behave, causing never ending disharmony and disruption which doesn't allow the board to really get on with things.
But in spite of that I feel the board has performed pretty well in getting the services of Richo along with the several new players, plus getting upgrades to C.S.S. and Leichhardt Ova
Click to expand...

This is an NRL forum … I think the Wests Magpies get discussed in a different sub forum
 
BZN said:
Yuh know, I reckon with so much un-necessary anti-Magpies sentiment shown on the WESTS Tigers Forum [which Imo really isn't a Wests Tigers Forum, it's a Balmain Tigers Forum] this could be a perfect example of how the Balmain people on the WT board behave, causing never ending disharmony and disruption which doesn't allow the board to really get on with things.
But in spite of that I feel the board has performed pretty well in getting the services of Richo along with the several new players, plus getting upgrades to C.S.S. and Leichhardt Oval.
I reckon any reasonable, fair and unbiased thinker would have to agree the board has done pretty well.
Click to expand...
Richo agreed on the proviso that the board was changed. So yeah, you're reading it wrong.

NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT BALMAIN. TAKE YOUR DIVISIVE RUBBISH ELSEWHERE.

Any bad sentiment is brought on by these divisive posts.
 
Telltails said:
And perhaps Denny Burgess should refute what he was accused of if in fact it was not true.

"The allegations raised with V'landys included a claim that HBG director Dennis Burgess has told Balmain chairman Danny Stapleton "we're bringing back the Wests Magpies" while at a game this season. "

If the HBG board were all pulling in the same direction after the review the current leadership wouldnt have ousted the former chair and directors. None of us really know what their motives are for the infighting but their is no doubt it is impacting on the effectiveness of their ability to run the club, and as WTs supporters we are all entitled to be concerned about that and question their right to hold such positions.
Click to expand...
If Denny Burgess never said what he is accused of, he shouldn't need to defend himself.
Gees, one of the people on here has answered my posts in that way on a few occasions with....
'I owe you nothing so why should I defend myself".
If it's ok for this person to say that I don't see why Burgess should have to.
If he does, he's just giving in to the mob and it could then become mob rule.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 1,010 (members: 4, guests: 1,006)
Back
Top