Taking a wrecking ball to the club! (Recent Media Reports)

Status
Not open for further replies.
hammertime said:
If you're argument is that the linked in data is faked, then geez man... that's stretching.

... and more so that's not how linkedin works. Firms do not tag you. Not sure what you're talking about there.

Where do you personally see the gap? No one ever fits the remit 100%
Click to expand...
Geeze mate? where did I say the Linked in data was faked?
You can't find the data you're looking for even after you said "it's a simple google search" 😂 But you did note (and thank you for stating the obvious) "it's a much better resume than yours. 🤣
 

You're making things up. So is he, the facts are you're
going into bat 4 the same people that brought you
the Pascoe & Hagipantelis years. This isn't a balmain
or magpies thing, only so many different ways
different people can highlight that to you. This is
all driven by WT's failure. We want 2 win on & off
the field with legit partners/ premierships that's it...
 
Kaito said:
You're making things up. So is he, the facts are you're
going into bat 4 the same people that brought you
the Pascoe & Hagipantelis years. This isn't a balmain
or magpies thing, only so many different ways
different people can highlight that to you. This is
all driven by WT's failure. We want 2 win on & off
the field with legit partners/ premierships that's it...
Click to expand...
Their are a few Balmain dinosaurs on here just as there are Magpies dinosaurs and to suggest a few of them didn't call for a buyout and name change is false.
 
twentyforty said:
Geeze mate? where did I say the Linked in data was faked?
You can't find the data you're looking for even after you said "it's a simple google search" 😂 But you did note (and thank you for stating the obvious) "it's a much better resume than yours. 🤣
Click to expand...
You said "people can put anything on linkedin"? and then refered to an example of someone adding fake data on you. Im not sure how else i could have read it?

I'm not sure what you mean by the 2nd part either. I found his profile easily, suggest you can do the same.
 
diedpretty said:
Andrechios text was non committal fluff as well. He has a " fear" that they want to change the name. How about he actually produces some evidence or provides details of how they are going to do do it.
Click to expand...
Doesn't need to be details on how they are going to do it. If someone doesn't support wests tigers as an entity, then they shouldn't be in power for wests tigers.

Rick has provided verbal evidence now of 3 occasions from dennis. SMH has also reported it. What do you want more, for people to testify with a hand on the bible?

Ill also add, if Danny stapleton was doing the same, I'd advocate for him to be removed. It's a core part of our problem. Such a God damn waste of time and energy to constantly talk about magpies or balmain.
 
diedpretty said:
It's so funny watching the " we are Wests Tigers " crowd suddenly changing tune and calling for a buyout and become Balmain. HYPOCRITES.
Click to expand...
WHERE?? Putting forward an argument for private ownership is not advocating balmain. Unless i missed something. Can you quote what you're talking about??
 
It's as plain as a day that some will defend the right to maintain control regardless of the crap show that supporters have had to endure under the current administration who have had plenty of time to get it right and without the review - the first step to addressing the failure of a club unable to play finals for the past 13 seasons - would still be listening to the spin by LH and Pascoe.
How can you possibly seriously say you are WTs supporter and not demand better?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Total: 652 (members: 19, guests: 633)
Back
Top